Wednesday, 30 December 2015

The power-crazed, fanatical Neoconservatives

On 28 December 2015, Paul Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary to the US Treasury and sometime editor of The Wall Street Journal, published the essay, 'Why WWIII is on the Horizon,' on his own blog.

This said:
"The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 gave birth to a dangerous American ideology called neoconservativism. The Soviet Union had served as a constraint on US unilateral action. With the removal of this constraint on Washington, neoconservatives declared their agenda of US world hegemony. America was now the 'sole superpower,' the 'unipower,' that could act without restraint anywhere in the world.

The Washington Post neoconservative journalist Charles Krauthammer summed up the “new reality” as follows: 'We have overwheming global power. We are history’s designated custodians of the international system... a unipolar world dominated by a single superpower unchecked by any rival and with decisive reach in every corner of the globe'... 
In 1992 top Pentagon official Undersecretary Paul Wolfowitz penned the Wolfowitz Doctrine, which became the basis for Washington’s foreign policy. The Wolfowitz Doctrine states that the 'first objective' of American foreign and military policy is 'to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a threat [to US unilateral action] on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union... and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power.' (A 'hostile power' is a country sufficiently strong to have a foreign policy independent from Washington’s.)

The unilateral assertion of American power begin in earnest during the Clinton regime with the interventions in Yugoslavia, Serbia, Kosovo, and the no-fly zone imposed on Iraq. In 1997 the neoconservatives penned their 'Project for a New American Century.' In 1998, three years prior to 9/11, the neoconservatives sent a letter to President Clinton calling for regime change in Iraq and 'the removal of Saddam Hussein from power.' Neoconservatives set out their program for removing seven governments in five years.
The events of September 11, 2001, are regarded by informed people as 'the new Pearl harbor' that the neoconservatives said was necessary in order to begin their wars of conquest in the Middle East. Paul O’Neil, President George W. Bush’s first Treasury Secretary, has stated pubicly that the agenda of President Bush’s first meeting with his cabinet was the invasion of Iraq. This invasion was planned prior to 9/11. Since 9/11 Washington has destroyed in whole or part eight countries and now confronts Russia both in Syria and Ukraine. 
Russia cannot allow a jihadist Caliphate to be established in an area comprising Syria/Iraq, because it would be a base for exporting destabilization into Muslim parts of the Russian Federation. Henry Kissinger himself has stated this fact, and it is clear enough to any person with a brain. However, the power-crazed fanatical neoconservatives, who have controlled the Clinton, Bush, and Obama regimes, are so absorbed in their own hubris and arrogance that they are prepared to push Russia to the point of having their Turkish puppet shoot down a Russian airplane and to overthrow the democratically-elected government in Ukraine that was on good terms with Russia, substituting in its place an American puppet government.

With this background, we can understand that the dangerous situation facing the world is the product of the neoconservative’s arrogant policy of US world hegemony. The failures of judgement and the dangers in the Syrian and Ukrainian conflicts are themselves the consequences of the neoconservative ideology.

To perpetuate American hegemony, the neoconservatives threw away the guarantees that Washington gave Gorbachev that NATO would not move one inch to the East. The neoconservatives pulled the US out of the ABM Treaty, which specified that neither the US nor Russia would develop and deploy anti-ballistic missiles. The neoconservatives re-wrote US war doctrine and elevated nuclear weapons from their role as a retaliatory force to a pre-emptive first strike force. The neoconservatives began putting ABM bases on Russia’s borders, claiming that the bases were for the purpose of protecting Europe from non-existent Iranian nuclear ICBMs.

Russia and Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, have been demonized by neoconservatives and their puppets in the US government and media. For example, Hillary Clinton, a candidate for the Democratic nomination for president, declared Putin to be 'the new Hitler.' A former CIA official called for Putin’s assassination. Presidential candidates in both parties are competing in terms of who can be the most aggressive toward Russia and the most insulting toward Russia’s president.

The effect has been to destroy the trust between nuclear powers. The Russian government has learned that Washington does not respect Washington’s own laws, much less international law, and that Washington cannot be trusted to keep any agreement. This lack of trust, together with the aggression toward Russia spewing from Washington and the presstitute media and echoing in the idiotic European capitals, has established the ground for nuclear war. As NATO (essentially the US) has no prospect of defeating Russia in conventional war, much less defeating an alliance of Russia and China, war will be nuclear.

To avoid war, Putin is non-provocative and low-key in his responses to Western provocations. Putin’s responsible behavior, however, is misinterpreted by neoconservatives as a sign of weakness and fear. The neoconservatives tell President Obama to keep the pressure on Russia, and Russia will give in. 
However, Putin has made it clear that Russia will not give in. Putin has sent this message on many occasions. For example, on September 28, 2015, at the 70th anniversary of the United Nations, Putin said that Russia can no longer tolerate the state of affairs in the world. Two days later Putin took command of the war against ISIS in Syria.

The European governments, especially Germany and the UK, are complicit in the move toward nuclear war. These two American vassal states enable Washington’s reckless aggression toward Russia by repeating Washington’s propaganda and supporting Washington’s sanctions and interventions against other countries. As long as Europe remains nothing but an extension of Washington, the prospect of Armegeddon will continue to rise.

At this point in time, nuclear war can only be avoided in two ways. One way is for Russia and China to surrender and accept Washington’s hegemony. The other way is for an independent leader in Germany, the UK, or France to rise to office and withdraw from NATO. That would begin a stampede to leave NATO, which is Washington’s prime tool for causing conflict with Russia and, thereby, is the most dangerous force on earth to every European country and to the entire world. 
If NATO continues to exist, NATO together with the neoconservative ideology of American hegemony will make nuclear war inevitable."
Interesting that the only two 'fanatical neoconservatives' Paul mentions by name (Wolfowitz and Krauthammer) just happen to be Jewish, don't you think? If anyone thinks this is a coincidence, check out Ari Shavit's April 2003 Haaretz essay, White Man's Burden.
Shavit wasn't the only concerned Jew blowing the whistle at that time:

Lots and lots of people tell the truth. Even in a dishonest PC age we still dare to tell it.

Even former government officials tell it. Even the bosses of national newspapers tell it.

Jews do also.

It's not just the Nationalist and the patriot who tells the truth these days.

Unfortunately, the truth-tellers are not in the best position to create and shape opinion. They do not own and staff the mainstream media. Who does? Do you know? Here's a clue:
'An independent leader in Germany, the UK, or France' must 'rise to office and withdraw from NATO' is the only way (outside of the abject surrender of Russia and China) to avoid 'nuclear war,' according to Craig Paul Roberts.

Well, Merkel and co. have the lid on the box containing independence nailed down tight in Germany and it's pretty difficult to see Nigel Farage saying 'boo' to the Neocon goose at this point. How about Marine Le Pen? Maybe. But her daughter is married to a Jew and she hasn't spoken out much on the subject of 'Holocaust Denial.' In France and many other European countries, if you you cite proof that six million Jews did not die, you go to jail.

If the blue touch paper is lit by anyone it might just be this man who lights it:
Or, perhaps, Paul Craig Roberts should be looking closer to home?
Sure, Donald Trump isn't ever going to come right out and say that Jews are the problem but if you attack the Jews' baby (the Jewish elite has always been four square behind the importation of the black and Asian hordes into the West) as boldly as this, you are no friend of Zion.

The fact that he and Putin have been saying nice things about each other also adds considerable fuel to this particular fire.

One last thing, if anyone out there thinks Paul Craig Roberts is scaremongering by introducing the possibility of nuclear confrontation, perhaps you should check out the scaremongers below.

No comments:

Post a Comment