Sunday, 12 May 2019

Why the New World Order wants mass migration into the West

In this interview, Alex Newman and William F. Jasper discuss how mass immigration into the Western world advances the objectives of the New World Order.

"Humanitarian" and "economic" claims are both fraudulent. The true agenda is the destruction of the nation state, paving the way, thereby, to true, irreversible global government.

The Architects of Western Decline - The Frankfurt School and Cultural Marxism

"The Frankfurt School and Cultural Marxist philosophy... now controls Western intellectualism, politics and culture. It was created by an internationalist intelligentsia to eradicate Western values, social systems and European racial groups."

The most notorious of the Frankfurt School's disciples are cited above.

All of them were Jewish.

The Great White Awakening has begun and NOTHING can stop it!

Donald Trump jnr. exposes bias, censorship and manipulation in the media

On 22 February 2019, Donald Trump jr. said this at Real Clear Politics:
"Conservatives have been censored by social media platforms. Instagram... deleted a post from former Republican National Committee spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany when she tried to highlight Elizabeth Warren’s lies about her ancestry. As soon as censorship of McEnany became a headline, Instagram once again claimed it was all a 'mistake.' If not for conservative media, the social media giant may never be held accountable.

Facebook offered the same lame excuse after banning several videos posted by conservative nonprofit PragerU for alleged 'hate speech.' It was an 'employee error,' the tech giant proclaimed after PragerU publicly complained about the censorship. Likewise, when Facebook encountered pushback for banning an ad for a Republican U.S. Senate candidate in the middle of last year’s midterm election campaign, it quickly restored the video and offered a weak apology for its 'mistake.'

Even worse than the censorship itself is the fact that it takes public outrage just to get Big Tech to treat conservative voices fairly. When social media censorship comes after someone like me, a prominent businessman and the son the president of the United States, it’s a story. The same is not true for the millions of conservative Americans who have no recourse whatsoever when Twitter or Facebook bans their accounts, limits their reach, and otherwise silences their voices because of their political opinions. It is they who are hurt the most by Big Tech’s manipulative partisan agenda.

Worryingly, there seems to be no limit to that manipulation. The tech giants are now tinkering with their terms of service to mandate that users adhere to liberal orthodoxy in their posts. It is now, for example, a banishment offense to 'misgender' or 'deadname' transgender people on Twitter, as even a radical feminist discovered when she tweeted that 'men are not women.'

The stakes in all this could not be higher. The social media revolution upended people’s relationship with the overwhelmingly liberal media. As the Smollett hoax illustrates, the political left and establishment journalists want nothing more than to return to a world in which their narrative is the only one that matters and the truth is whatever they decree it to be.

Unfortunately, Silicon Valley is showing us that tech companies, too, can manipulate information for partisan ends. Their censorship is increasing at an alarming rate, just in time for them to try to spoil my father’s re-election bid, but we won’t let them get away with it.

Those of us with a big enough public profile to hold the tech giants accountable for their partisan speech-policing have a duty to do so. Ordinary conservatives can’t force multi-billion-dollar companies to guarantee their right to free speech, which is exactly what the liberals are counting on.

They’ve gone too far, though. They’ve poked the hornet’s nest of conservative activists, and we will continue to vigilantly shame them for their censorship, because so much is at stake."
Once again:
"The stakes in all this could not be higher. The social media revolution upended people’s relationship with the overwhelmingly liberal media. As the Smollett hoax illustrates, the political left and establishment journalists want nothing more than to return to a world in which their narrative is the only one that matters and the truth is whatever they decree it to be."
Thanks, Don.

BREXIT - Before the referendum...

What the globalist politician said BEFORE the referendum (one he expected to win) and after it has proved to be very different.

Many of those who wish to remain in the European Union have, since the moment in June 2016 when 17.4 million Briton registered a desire to be done with that organisation, undergone a dramatic conversion from the categoric political positions they insisted, at the time, were written in stone. Before the referendum it was our decision, ours alone. Now, we're just a bunch of know-nothing fools who got it wrong.

Whatever motivates creatures like those illuminated in this video it is not a belief in democracy and the will of the people. It is not truth or right behaviour. What they and those who own them want is forever paramount, what we want, in normal circumstances, would be as nothing. But these circumstances and these times are not normal. The British people stood tall after their leaders told them their wishes would be respected.

They lied, our wishes were NOT respected and, for once, the storm clouds gathered apace.

They are at war with us, ladies and gentlemen, they always were. Now many of us, at long last, are determinedly sharpening pitchforks in our turn.

Politicians lie, ladies and gentlemen. Dishonesty is the default position.

Friday, 10 May 2019

Rabbis against Zionism!

"Iran will wipe Israel off the map?"
Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad never said it!

Hey, western warmongers! Hey, Zion's lapdogs! Thanks for deceiving us!


His actual words?
"Israel is an unnatural creature. It will not survive."
Propaganda kills millions. And that's just how THEY like it.

Sunday, 17 March 2019


Theresa May assured us, categorically, over one hundred times, that we would be leaving the European Union on 29 March 2019.

She lied. We will not be leaving then. No one should be surprised, either that we will not be leaving the EU on the date specified, or that our Prime Minister deceived us.

Politicians lie. Dishonesty is the default position. Those who lie most effectively get to occupy the House in Downing Street, the Élysée Palace, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and the various Prime Ministerial and Presidential residences from which the majority of our elite politicians ignore all bar billionaire bankers, billionaire businessmen and media magnates with a passion.

Soon after Mrs May became Prime Minister, David Cameron having resigned in the wake of the referendum result, she began to say things like 'we must bring the country together' and 'we must heal the divisions.'

From that point on it became increasingly obvious that she and her 'Remainer' cabinet would not be honouring the result of the referendum. The 17.4 million who voted to leave the EU would, if her vision prevailed, be rid of their masters in name only, if at all.

'Bring the country together' and 'heal the divisions' was never anything more than cynical and deceptive code for 'I will give half the referendum winners' winnings to the losers!' Thereby, ensuring a 'soft,' EU-friendly Brexit before the terms 'soft' and 'hard' had even been invented.

If the Remain campaign had won the referendum by four percentage points, do you imagine that the losers would have been pandered to in any way? Would a Remainer cabinet have tried to 'bring the country together' by ensuring that we were half in and half out of an EU that 48 percent of the British people detested?

Of course they wouldn't. There would have been much overt and congratulatory back-slapping in Westminster and Brussels and the elite euphoria would have been played out in the mainstream media over and over again as the powers-that-be rubbed the noses of the losers in the result. There would have been no talk of 'coming together' and 'healing division.'

Theresa May also repeatedly promised that 'NO DEAL' would be better than a 'BAD DEAL.' However, we now find that this option has been vetoed, despite the fact that this was always much closer to what the British people thought they were voting for in June 2016, than Olly Robbins' deal or anything else proposed by our parliamentarians.

How long will Brexit, any kind of Brexit, be delayed? Your guess is as good as mine. Will we ever get what we voted for in June 2016? Not if the EU, our own MPs, the mainstream media and those who own them all can help it!

The question that appeared on referendum ballot papers was as follows:
The majority, despite all the 'Project Fear' propaganda voted to 'leave.'

They did not vote for a deal. They did not vote to remain subject to the European Union's dictat in all but name.

Politicians lie, ladies and gentlemen, dishonesty is the default position.

Friday, 15 March 2019

Former Brexit Ministers speak out!

DAVID DAVIS: Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union - 2016–2018: 
'The majority of Whitehall was not enthusiastically pro-LEAVE... We were regularly overruled by Downing Street... and the result is, we have ended up with what I would describe as a Remainers' Brexit.'
STEVE BAKER: Minister in the Department for Exiting the European Union - 2016-2018:
"The constant refrain throughout my time in government was this atmosphere of reluctance to leave. They cannot face up to enthusiastically delivering the mandate that they have. And that has meant that our entire negotiation has been fearful, conducted in a posture of supplication. The entire approach is approach is suffused by a reluctance to deliver what the public wanted, which is us controlling our laws in our parliament with all that that means. 
So the relationship between Number 10 and the DEXU ministers was always one of instinctive tension because I think the DEXU ministers believed overwhelmingly in exiting the European Union. Whereas, overwhelmingly, the staff of Number 10 seemed not to be people with a heart for it. And I think that that tension suffused the entire process. We were regularly overruled.

For example, after President Donald Tusk made his offer of security co-operation, participation in institutions of research, innovation, education and culture... he also made an advanced free trade agreement, all sectors, no tariffs... Once he’d made that offer I was very pleased because it matched the policy which DEXU ministers had decided. And I wanted to start putting it in my speeches. And one speech in particular, I remember, was edited by Number 10 to remove references to that offer because, of course, IT WAS NOT THE OFFER THAT THE SYSTEM AS A WHOLE WANTED.”

Thursday, 14 March 2019

Yossi Gurvits: When Israel is mighty!

Boy-oh-boy, do I love the whistle-blowing Jew!

So should we all. The Jewish whistle-blower is just about the only person a brainwashed lemming will listen to. And just about the only person a non-Jewish Zionist won't dare dismiss with some fashionably PC insult. 'Racist, Fascist, Nazi, bigot, anti-Semite!' Such straight of out the 'Big-Girls'-Best-Book-of-Bolshevik-Bogey-Words' b***ocks is not for the likes of Yossi. Such invective is reserved for us alone.

So, thanks, Yossi. You're doing a grand job of enlightening the world, my son. Keep it up!
"From very early on, Rabbinical Judaism is a Judaism that hates humans. It defines only Jews as human; only Jews who believe in the religion as human. OK, let's get this exactly right, only Jews who believe in the religion AND ARE MEN are full humans...

If you kill a Jew, even a Jewish woman, even the slave of a Jew, and here it's important to note that Orthodox Judaism has never abolished slavery, then there is a penalty you have to pay. It could come to execution or be a fine... But if you kill a non-Jew, you're guilty but there is no penalty, God will punish you... That's the Talmud...

Maimonides... decrees that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a three-year-old girl... He decrees that, if a Jew rapes a three-year-old non-Jewish girl, then she must be executed! Her, not him, because she tempted him to sin!

And, for this reason, you have to treat her like an animal...

When there is a Jewish regime... it is merciless, it can do what it likes."