Sunday, 17 March 2019


Theresa May assured us, categorically, over one hundred times, that we would be leaving the European Union on 29 March 2019.

She lied. We will not be leaving then. No one should be surprised, either that we will not be leaving the EU on the date specified, or that our Prime Minister deceived us.

Politicians lie. Dishonesty is the default position. Those who lie most effectively get to occupy the House in Downing Street, the Élysée Palace, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and the various Prime Ministerial and Presidential residences from which the majority of our elite politicians ignore all bar billionaire bankers, billionaire businessmen and media magnates with a passion.

Soon after Mrs May became Prime Minister, David Cameron having resigned in the wake of the referendum result, she began to say things like 'we must bring the country together' and 'we must heal the divisions.'

From that point on it became increasingly obvious that she and her 'Remainer' cabinet would not be honouring the result of the referendum. The 17.4 million who voted to leave the EU would, if her vision prevailed, be rid of their masters in name only, if at all.

'Bring the country together' and 'heal the divisions' was never anything more than cynical and deceptive code for 'I will give half the referendum winners' winnings to the losers!' Thereby, ensuring a 'soft,' EU-friendly Brexit before the terms 'soft' and 'hard' had even been invented.

If the Remain campaign had won the referendum by four percentage points, do you imagine that the losers would have been pandered to in any way? Would a Remainer cabinet have tried to 'bring the country together' by ensuring that we were half in and half out of an EU that 48 percent of the British people detested?

Of course they wouldn't. There would have been much overt and congratulatory back-slapping in Westminster and Brussels and the elite euphoria would have been played out in the mainstream media over and over again as the powers-that-be rubbed the noses of the losers in the result. There would have been no talk of 'coming together' and 'healing division.'

Theresa May also repeatedly promised that 'NO DEAL' would be better than a 'BAD DEAL.' However, we now find that this option has been vetoed, despite the fact that this was always much closer to what the British people thought they were voting for in June 2016, than Olly Robbins' deal or anything else proposed by our parliamentarians.

How long will Brexit, any kind of Brexit, be delayed? Your guess is as good as mine. Will we ever get what we voted for in June 2016? Not if the EU, our own MPs, the mainstream media and those who own them all can help it!

The question that appeared on referendum ballot papers was as follows:
The majority, despite all the 'Project Fear' propaganda voted to 'leave.'

They did not vote for a deal. They did not vote to remain subject to the European Union's dictat in all but name.

Politicians lie, ladies and gentlemen, dishonesty is the default position.

Friday, 15 March 2019

Former Brexit Ministers speak out!

DAVID DAVIS: Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union - 2016–2018: 
'The majority of Whitehall was not enthusiastically pro-LEAVE... We were regularly overruled by Downing Street... and the result is, we have ended up with what I would describe as a Remainers' Brexit.'
STEVE BAKER: Minister in the Department for Exiting the European Union - 2016-2018:
"The constant refrain throughout my time in government was this atmosphere of reluctance to leave. They cannot face up to enthusiastically delivering the mandate that they have. And that has meant that our entire negotiation has been fearful, conducted in a posture of supplication. The entire approach is approach is suffused by a reluctance to deliver what the public wanted, which is us controlling our laws in our parliament with all that that means. 
So the relationship between Number 10 and the DEXU ministers was always one of instinctive tension because I think the DEXU ministers believed overwhelmingly in exiting the European Union. Whereas, overwhelmingly, the staff of Number 10 seemed not to be people with a heart for it. And I think that that tension suffused the entire process. We were regularly overruled.

For example, after President Donald Tusk made his offer of security co-operation, participation in institutions of research, innovation, education and culture... he also made an advanced free trade agreement, all sectors, no tariffs... Once he’d made that offer I was very pleased because it matched the policy which DEXU ministers had decided. And I wanted to start putting it in my speeches. And one speech in particular, I remember, was edited by Number 10 to remove references to that offer because, of course, IT WAS NOT THE OFFER THAT THE SYSTEM AS A WHOLE WANTED.”

Thursday, 14 March 2019

Yossi Gurvits: When Israel is mighty!

Boy-oh-boy, do I love the whistle-blowing Jew!

So should we all. The Jewish whistle-blower is just about the only person a brainwashed lemming will listen to. And just about the only person a non-Jewish Zionist won't dare dismiss with some fashionably PC insult. 'Racist, Fascist, Nazi, bigot, anti-Semite!' Such straight of out the 'Big-Girls'-Best-Book-of-Bolshevik-Bogey-Words' b***ocks is not for the likes of Yossi. Such invective is reserved for us alone.

So, thanks, Yossi. You're doing a grand job of enlightening the world, my son. Keep it up!
"From very early on, Rabbinical Judaism is a Judaism that hates humans. It defines only Jews as human; only Jews who believe in the religion as human. OK, let's get this exactly right, only Jews who believe in the religion AND ARE MEN are full humans...

If you kill a Jew, even a Jewish woman, even the slave of a Jew, and here it's important to note that Orthodox Judaism has never abolished slavery, then there is a penalty you have to pay. It could come to execution or be a fine... But if you kill a non-Jew, you're guilty but there is no penalty, God will punish you... That's the Talmud...

Maimonides... decrees that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a three-year-old girl... He decrees that, if a Jew rapes a three-year-old non-Jewish girl, then she must be executed! Her, not him, because she tempted him to sin!

And, for this reason, you have to treat her like an animal...

When there is a Jewish regime... it is merciless, it can do what it likes."

Monday, 11 March 2019

Trump jnr. criticises social media's left-wing censors!

Tucker Carlson interview with Donald Trump Jr. who blows the whistle on social media's free speech censors!

Friday, 1 March 2019

Liberals send Scandinavian girls to be beheaded!

Louisa Vesterager Jespersen and Maren Ueland were beheaded in Morocco by Islamic extremists – but who was really to blame, who sent those girls to their deaths?