Jewish students paid to post pro-Israel comments on line

To give you an idea what this student type might get up to I could have cited a little of the Twitter argument that took place between myself (and many others) and the usual suspects when Israel was, yet again, doing its slaughterous fish-in-a-barrel thing in Gaza.

Sneering insult and smear was the order of the day from the oppo. Often one got the impression that, actuality-wise, those engaging in this nastiness didn't know their a*** from their elbow. They, as you might imagine, could not have cared less.

Anyway, instead of a lengthy Twitter spectacular, I'll draw your attention to a piece on Tumblr. I feature in this little exposé, described as a 'neo-Nazi.' As it happens, I'm no such thing. I tell the truth. In particular, I tell the kind of truth that the animals at the top of the tree do not want told. It occurs to me that 'Longer Soupy,' the chap who constructed this article, is very much the kind of 'student' whom said animals might finance in order to try and intimidate the truth teller. Here's his raison d'etre:

"I created this quick and rather imperfect antifascist guide on Twitter some time ago. It was originally written as a series of tweets. It attempts to explain many of the characteristics found amongst neo-Nazis, antisemites and unremorseful racists who litter social media, and in particular, Twitter.

It is meant to be used as a series of tweets, please feel free to cut and paste it into Twitter... How to spot & avoid those that probably like hardcore racist or antisemitic material on Twitter."

Thus, we can see that Soupy wants his readership to automatically reject anything his definition of a bad guy ('antifascist,' 'neo-Nazi,' 'antisemite,' 'racist' 'hardcore racist') might be. Well, when you've been at the receiving end of such ad hominem garbage as long as I have you will almost certainly have learned how to defend yourself from these crude attempts at censorship. Here's an example of one of the ways I routinely deal with such would-be censors:

Jewish truth-tellers were responsible for the statements cited above. How do the Long Soupies deal with these? Are these anti-Semites? Are these going to be threatened with arrest and imprisonment if they dare to let too many anti-Semitic cats out of the bag?

We don't think so, do we? Throughout Europe a good few honest non-Jews have been imprisoned for publishing sentiments such as these but, so far, the authorities have not dared to punish the Jew similarly. So, if I quote the facts broadcast by the Jewish worthy, what can 'authority' do?

Very little that, in a court of law, would stand up to forensic scrutiny, I dare say.

As Mira says, 'it's no longer that easy to get away with murder' now. Nor is is anywhere near as simple for the apparatchik paid to protect the murderers to do so simply by hurling invective at those who would expose them.

Long Soupy and Zionism's student blue-pencil merchants would do well to remember this.

P.S. At one point in his advisory article, Soupy suggests we 'look out for... words like, 'New World Order,' 'Rothschild,' '9/11' and 'cabal.' Such terms are, apparently, indicative of 'serious conspiracy stuff.'

One imagines, then, that those who pay the Soupies to usher us away from such matters, do not want them investigated in any depth. Reason enough to carry on doing so, I say.

In his list of proscribed bogey words there was one other that, according to Soupy, ought to set the alarm bells of the upstanding anti-Fascist ringing.

That word was 'truth.'

Says it all, don't you think?