Saturday, 9 September 2006

Barrot, Barroso and EU Justice

On 28 November 2008, European Justice Commissioner, Jacques Barrot, informed us that, throughout the EU, the courts will soon be able to imprison those who dare to say what the EU bosses do not want said.

Here is what he said at the Press Conference:

"It took nearly seven years of negotiations to achieve this... I welcome the introduction of strict and effective sanctions against these violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms which are common principles for European countries...

Racism and xenophobia have no place in Europe, and should have no part in the world."
This agreement will enable and, perhaps, force each individual member state to imprison those whom the EU's Justice Department deems guilty of 'public incitement to violence or hatred against a group of persons or a member of such a group.' The Justice Department of the EU will, of course, be able to determine what constitutes 'incitement.'

For example, should I wish to warn the British people (as I do at the at this site and elsewhere) that a black individual living in Britain is at least 100 times more likely to murder a white individual (an Asian is about 25 times more likely) than the other way around, I could be imprisoned for 3 years. Even though I would be telling the truth. This because EU laywers could argue that such information might 'incite violence or hatred.'

The agreement consolidates this anti-indigenous law by making indirect reference to internet incitement thus: '... by public dissemination or distribution of tracts, pictures or other material.' Truth-telling sites like this one would, therefore, almost certainly be outlawed in the UK.

Some will say that laws like this already exist in our own statute book so not a lot should change. It is true that such laws exist but the government has been loath to use them because of the flak it would draw from just about everywhere. Whoever is in power in this country will soon, however, be able to blame any future clampdown on the EU, just as they do now with the EU's 'human rights' legislation, which is used, ad nauseam, to prevent us deporting those who break our laws.

The crime of the near future cited below does NOT appear on our statute books.

"The apology, denial or gross trivialization of public crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the International Criminal Court."
Holocaust Denial will, therefore, for the first time, be punishable by law in our country.

On 22 November 2004, BBC News reported thus:

"Mr Barrot... RECEIVED A SUSPENDED JAIL TERM IN A PARTY FUNDING CASE IN 2000, but it was automatically erased by a 1995 presidential amnesty."
When informed that Jacques Barrot, who was then EC Vice President designate, had previously been convicted of embezzlement, EU President, Jose-Manuel Barroso, denied any prior knowledge of this and refused to dismiss him.

On 15 December 2007, Barroso spoke of his desire to create a New World Order, in alliance with Africa.

At the summit of the European and African Unions in Lisbon, he said:

"Imagine if we showed that with 1.5 billion people and 80 countries - almost half the UN membership - we can make a real impact, both regionally and as global partners."
Why bother with the little that was left of Europe when Africa could dilute the influence of the individual nation state by a whopping 80 countries-worth, eh? And yet, after Romania and Bulgaria had been brought into the ever increasing EU circle, Barroso had previously said:

"That's it. No more EU expansion."
On 1 July 2005, The Guardian told us this:

"JOSE MANUEL BARROSO HAS A REVOLUTIONARY PAST… At 18, THE FUTURE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION WAS A MAOIST...

Unlike many European students of the early 1970s, who took to the streets as an amusing diversion from comfortable middle-class lives, Barroso was caught up in a genuine revolution in Portugal.

On April 25 1974, a month after his 18th birthday, the young law student found himself on the streets of Lisbon as the rightwing Portuguese dictatorship finally fell... ‘I am very proud of that period,’ Barroso, now 49, says of his former clandestine life...

As Portugal's centre-right prime minister, who rammed through controversial economic reforms in the face of a recession, BARROSO WAS A NATURAL SOULMATE FOR MR BLAIR, WHO SKILLFULLY ENGINEERED HIS APPOINTMENT AS COMMISSION PRESIDENT LAST YEAR…

Barroso adopts a headmasterly tone as he reminds the prime minister that he now has to put Europe's interests first during the six-month presidency.

‘Tony Blair has shown great leadership qualities in Britain. I hope he will show now the same leadership qualities in Europe. For that he needs an approach that is inclusive. Dynamic yes. But inclusive'."
'Revolutionary past?' 'A Maoist?' 'Very proud of that period?' I guess this is why the 'inclusive' Mr Barroso would be a 'natural soulmate for Mr Blair.'

On 16 January 2008, Jerome R. Corsi published The New World Disorder at
WorldNetDaily.com. This, in part, is what was said:

"German Chancellor Angela Merkel, President Bush AND EUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESIDENT JOSE MANUEL BARROSO at a White House summit meeting last April where they launched the Transatlantic Economic Council...

The plan – currently being implemented by the Bush administration with the formation of the Transatlantic Economic Council in April 2007 – appears to be following a plan written in 1939 by a WORLD-GOVERNMENT advocate who sought to create a Transatlantic Union as an international governing body.

An economist from the World Bank has argued in print that the formation of THE TRANSATLANTIC COMMON MARKET IS DESIGNED TO FOLLOW THE BLUEPRINT OF JEAN MONNET, A KEY INTELLECTUAL ARCHITECT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, RECOGNIZING THAT ECONOMIC INTEGRATION MUST INEVITABLY LEAD TO POLITICAL INTEGRATION...

Writing in the Fall 2007 issue of the Streit Council journal "Freedom and Union"... Bennett... confirmed that what has become known as THE "MERKEL INITIATIVE" WOULD ALLOW THE TRANSATLANTIC ECONOMIC COUNCIL TO INTEGRATE AND HARMONIZE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND REGULATIONS BETWEEN THE U.S. AND THE EU 'IN A VERY QUIET WAY'...

The Streit Council is named after CLARENCE K. STREIT, WHOSE 1939 BOOK 'UNION NOW' CALLED FOR THE CREATION OF A TRANSATLANTIC UNION AS A STEP TOWARD WORLD GOVERNMENT...

World Bank economist Domenec Ruiz Devesa openly acknowledged that: 'Transatlantic economic integration, though important in itself, is not the end. As understood by Jean Monnet... ECONOMIC INTEGRATION MUST AND WILL LEAD TO POLITICAL INTEGRATION'...

The Transatlantic Economic Council is an official international governmental body ESTABLISHED BY EXECUTIVE FIAT IN THE U.S. AND THE EU WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL OR OVERSIGHT. NO NEW LAW OR TREATY WAS SOUGHT BY THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION TO APPROVE OR IMPLEMENT THE PLAN TO CREATE A TRANSATLANTIC COMMON MARKET...

Today, the website of the Transatlantic Economic Council openly proclaims THE TEC IS: 'A POLITICAL BODY TO OVERSEE AND ACCELERATE GOVERNMENT-TO-GOVERNMENT INTEGRATION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'."
And, of course, what better way to 'accelerate government-to-government integration' than to organise a world-wide credit squeeze? As our very own Gordon Brown said to The Washington Post recently:

"THE GLOBAL PROBLEMS WE FACE REQUIRE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS… Visionary internationalism is needed to resolve the crises and challenges of a different age. And the greatest of global challenges demands of us the boldest of global cooperation..

There are no Britain-only or Europe-only or America-only solutions to today's problems. WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER."
On 10 October 2008, Jacques Barrot, a convicted embezzler who will shortly oversee the introduction of legislation that will see many honest men and women imprisoned throughout Europe, was interviewed by cafebabel.com. Here are some of the things he said:

"The demographic situation of Europe means a need for focused migration... IMMIGRATION IS BOTH AN ECONOMIC AND MORAL OBLIGATION... The states are COMPELLED TO MUTUAL SOLIDARITY!"
Yep. Let’s compel Europe's individual states to swamp themselves with all manner of enriching types not the least bit like them! Why? BECAUSE WE CAN!

"We are considering a resettlement program for Iraqi refugees in Europe."
Oh yes. That Gulf War II provided all sorts of nice bonuses for us global villagers!

"I am not at all certain that this desire to close the borders, this SECURITY-OBSESSED VISION of migratory flux is the most prevalent."
Why should we bother about the security obsessions of the plebs when we have our gated communities in the leafy suburbs? Jail them for three years if they complain!

"Seeing Islam as antagonist to European values is totally partial and erroneous."
Why is it 'partial and erroneous' when common sense says the opposite is the case? BECAUSE WE SAY SO!

"Once pluralism is accepted by Islam, in Europe at least, Islam is welcome."
Accepting 'pluralism' is completely against much of what is said in The Koran and is completely against ALL fundamentalist Islam as it manifests itself today. Barrot, Barroso and Blair will know this. 'Welcoming Islam' is code for European surrender to the non-indigenous.

At Jacques Barrot's November 28 press conference, we were told that his truth-suppressing EU laws could be created and implemented in less than two months.

'Free speech,' eh? 'Britons never, never, never shall be slaves,' eh? 'An Englishman's home is his castle,' eh? 'This sceptred isle,' eh? 'We band of brothers,' eh? 'Cry, God, for Harry, England and St George,' eh?

Well, here we are, folks. According to the thieving Frog, Jacques Barrot, his Maoist boss, Jose Manuel Barroso, and the globalist traitors in Westminster, everything that went before was all balls. You happy with this?

No comments:

Post a Comment