I suggested three myself. One of whom was immediately withdrawn by a Telegraph censor.
Here are the two that (encouragingly) were not:
On 18 October 2010, The Jerusalem Post quoted Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the head of Shas’s Council of
Torah Sages, thus:
"Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel... With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money...Rabbi Ovadia Yosef
That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew. Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why gentiles were created."
The big shot Rabbi gets a much-merited turd of the year vote from me.
On 11 November 2010, The Daily Mail quoted the EU President, Herman Van Rompuy, thus:
"THE TIME OF THE HOMOGENOUS NATION STATE IS OVER... WE HAVE TOGETHER TO FIGHT THE DANGER OF A NEW EUROSCEPTICISM... In every member state, there are people who believe their country can survive alone in the globalised world. IT IS MORE THAN AN ILLUSION – IT IS A LIE." Herman Van RompuyIf you want to spin something, Herman you should employ a Blair or a Mandelson, you aren't that good at it.
Here's the non-lie: in every member state, there are people who believe their country can survive better as a sovereign state within a cooperative trading organisation. As opposed to being forever subject to the brute, globalist strategies of a malign, self-serving elite. Herman added:
"Fear leads to egoism, egoism leads to nationalism. Nationalism leads to war."Indeed. Whenever the elite feel their globalist agenda might be compromised they will threaten, and eventually make, war. As for 'egotism', who’s the egotist banging the drum for rule by the centralised elite forever, Herman? Who’s the egotist who wants a 'war' with those who don’t agree with him? It ain’t us homogenous nation state folk, now is it?
"Today’s nationalism is often not a positive feeling of pride in one’s own identity, but a negative feeling of apprehension of the others."And we shouldn't be apprehensive of foreigners like you who want to make war upon us?
"Just imagine the big recession of 2008/09 with the old currencies."Makes you wonder why your best pals engineered the recession in the first place, doesn’t it?
"A currency war always ends in protectionism."And we shouldn’t protect ourselves from those who make 'currency war' upon us? We shouldn’t protect ourselves from the greedy bankers who fund the global agenda and profit so obscenely from it?
Nice try, Herman.
"French president Francois Mitterrand’s famous phrase that ‘NATIONALISM IS WAR’."Oh yes, ladies and gents, the New World Order elite has been at war with the rest of us for quite some time now. Oh, and by the way, Herman, forgive me for repeating myself but this 'war' against the 'homogenous nation state' you seem to be after waging, as a matter of interest, will you be out there at the head of your armies, leading the dumb herd on to victory by dint of your own courageous example? Or will you be sitting out your war in a bomb-proof bunker in Brussels?
Thought so. Herman Van Rompuy would be another of my 2010 villains.
Annoyed that the Censor had removed my first 'villain', I responded thus:
"So someone censored my 'Dominique Strauss Kahn, Director General of the IMF,' post. For anyone who's interested, the post contained Kahn quotations from an interview on French TV. The quotes were damning. They pointed out that the imposition of a World Government, with the Strauss-Kahns at the helm, was well under way. Oh, and I also pointed out Strauss-Kahn was Jewish. I wonder which of these factual evidences most inclined the censor to censor.Here's what the Telegraph censor didn't want Joe Public to know:
If anyone wishes to see the DSK quote, let me know. Perhaps the censor in question will find it more difficult to remove if such arbitrary censorship of the facts bothers more than one regular contributor."
"Dominique Strauss Kahn, the directer general of the IMF, was interviewed by Patrick Cohen for France Inter on 15 November 2010. Here is an English translation of some of the things Strauss-Kahn said during the interview:Curiously truthful here, Mr. Straus-Kahn. Oh yes, ladies and gentleman, world government, presided over by the likes of the former Director General of the IMF is no recent notion. It has been in the planning for centuries.
'What is the big problem today in the World Economy?… THIS COMES FROM AN ECONOMY THAT HAS BECOME GLOBALISED… The Big Challenge of the 20th century is THE ADVANCEMENT… OF A WORLD GOVERNMENT… THE EMBRYO OF THE WORLD GOVERNMENT TAKES THE FORM OF THE G20, AND IN THE CORE OF THIS NEW WORLD GOVERNMENT IS THE NEW IMF… For that I HAD TO REFORM THE IMF so that it would be able to do this…
THE G20 AS AN EMBRYO OF THE WORLD GOVERNMENT, the IMF as an engine of this G20... The motor, the heart of the system has become an IMF that doesn’t have much more to do with the old IMF… WHO HELPS TO CONSTRUCT THIS, THIS, EH THIS, WORLD GOVERNMENT… I read often in columns how the Left didn’t really profit in the end, that the government of the Right has continued to profit… WELL, IT’S BECAUSE THE LEFT IS THERE WORKING AWAY IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WORLD GOVERNMENT that the first phase was done…
(Politicians) were elected, in most cases anyway they have to pay back their voters, so they come back to THEIR LITTLE AFFAIRS OF NATIONAL POLITICS, and so they are in the habit of leaving cooperation aside, so that’s why I tell you we return to the second phase, TOWARDS WORLD GOVERNMENT…
There will be highs and lows, we will go forward at times, come back others, it will not come to pass in one night, CONSTRUCTING THIS WORLD GOVERNMENT, DOMINATING THE WORLD ECONOMY… EACH G20 WILL BE A STEP IN THIS DIRECTION. IT’S MY CONVICTION AND IF I WAS TO GO RIGHT UP THE TOP OF MY CONVICTION IT HAS BEEN PLANNED LIKE THIS FOR A VERY LONG TIME." Dominique Strauss Kahn
By the Strauss-Kahns.