They can be found here: Prindle on Freud
And here: Prindle on Freud (2)
"While reading a review by E Michael Jones of Roy Schoeman’s book Salvation is from the Jews on Jones’ Culture Wars website I was taken aback by this:
'Karl Marx… wrote poetry dedicating himself to Satan as a young man, [as did] Sigmund Freud, about whom Paul Vitzsays much the same'.
I already knew that Hans Israel had proved that Freud was an inveterate liar in his Der Fall Freud: Die Geburt der Psychoanalyse aus der Lüge. But the suggestion that Freud may have been a Satanist as well as a habitual liar looked well worth investigating.
I searched the terms 'Freud', 'Satanist' and 'Bakan' and I discovered that articles written by an R. E. Prindle containing these terms had appeared in an ezine dedicated to Edgar Rice Burroughs, the author of the Tarzan novels... I had no idea that Joseph Stalin had found ERB (Edgar Rice Burroughs) sufficiently dangerous to assign Soviet agents to sabotage his writing career...
My first appreciation of this astoundingly illuminating thinker will concentrate on Prindle’s insights about Freud and the death of the West. I hope that it will encourage others to read deeply in the Corpus Prindeliana.
To understand Freud’s role in the intentional subversion of Western civilization one has to understand the historical processes at work on the eve of the First World War...
Now Prindle has described one stream of destructive thought that has flowed from Medieval France into the revolutionary turmoil of the world since 1789.
The Jewish Role.
This would not be important or relevant to an understanding of the historical role of Freud if Freud had been the honest scientist searching for truth that he claimed to be. But Freud habitually lied...
Prindle is not alone in observing that a major theme in the Jewish conception of the messiah and his kingdom is and always has been vengeance. Abraham Grossman concluded 'that a link exists between vengeance to be carried out against the enemies of Israel and redemption, and that vengeance is a forerunner to redemption, can be found in the Bible, the Talmud, and in apocalyptic literature, and should not be viewed as uniquely Ashkenazi.'
The renowned sociologist Max Weber once noted:
'In the mind of the pious Jew the moralism of the law was inevitably combined with the aforementioned hope for revenge, which suffused practically all the exile and postexilic sacred scriptures. Moreover, through two and a half millennium this hope appeared in virtually every divine service of the Jewish people… one finds that in Judaism the doctrine of religious resentment has an idiosyncratic quality and plays a unique role not found among the disprivileged classes of any other religion.'
The Mishneh Torah of Maimonides (Rambam) - that most famous of Jewish theologians - deals with the commandments enjoined upon the children of Israel when their entry to the land of Israel coincides with the arrival of the Messiah. He taught that ‘any Gentile not upholding the Noachic commandments is to be killed if under our rule.’ The Rambam went even further and concluded that all living beings must uphold the Noachic commandments or else be put to death.
Prindle reminds us that at the end of the thirteenth century the Jews were expelled from England, at the beginning of the fourteenth from France, and for the duration, well, they were welcome nowhere. He argues that this sense of grievance grew until with their expulsion from Spain in 1492 their sense of injustice burst into open flames. They swore to take revenge on Europe.
Prindle describes Sabbatai Zevi as ‘the last great messianic impostor'.
Shabbatai Zevi (1626-1676)
Shabbatai Zevi was the son of a wealthy merchant from Smyrna. He gave the boy the best Jewish education possible. He became obsessed with the precepts of the Lurianic Kabbalah. Shabbatai was a prize pupil of the Talmud and became a rabbi by eighteen. But he displayed of an uncontrollable sex drive. A major area of talmudic law that his radical doctrine was to reverse were the laws governing sexual morality, nudity, and forbidden relations.
During one of his fits of elation he proclaimed himself to be the Messiah. He offended some who heard him, but others listened and were persuaded. He was finally banished from his hometown in 1651. He settled in Salonika. Before long he was made unwelcome in that city too.This crisis was precipitated by his marriage-in public - to a Torah Scroll. Shabbatai then settled in Constantinople for nine months.
In 1658 he proclaimed the “essence of the new law is to be found in the sanctification of transgressions and their elevation to the level of positive religious rules needing a formal ritual blessing.”
He began systematically teaching the paradoxical doctrine of holy deeds through sinning. He sought out Nathan of Gaza, who claimed to have the key to restore peace to the soul.Nathan was aware of Shabbatai’s reputation for ecstatic insights. Nathan had plans for Shabbatai. Rather than “cure” him, Nathan set about to convince Shabbatai that he was indeed the Messiah.
The two traveled the Holy Land together teaching the Kabbalah and its messianic message. One night Nathan went into a trance and proclaimed that Shabbatai was the messiah in the presence of a large group of people.
The news of Shabbatai’s messianic role spread like wildfire.He rode triumphantly to Jerusalem on a white horse. He circled the city seven times, increasing his following with each circuit, including many of the rabbis there. The movement spread throughout the Mideast and in Europe as well. In 1665, Nathan drafted a letter touting Shabbatai’s persuasive powers.The letter included Shabbatai’s plan to take Turkey in a bloodless coup. He would gather the Ten Lost Tribes.
The response was astonishing. Jews, from the least to the greatest, all over Europe were swept up in the messianic fervor. Some rabbis opposed him, but they were ineffective. The masses believed wholeheartedly that Shabbatai was the messiah. The purported Messiah set out on a misguided attempt to capture Turkey. The Jews there awaited his arrival excitedly. The Turks arrested him immediately. Remarkably, however, he somehow escaped death and was treated quite well thanks to huge bribes from his disciples. This favor by Turks only fanned the flame of enthusiasm further.
People sold all their property, they lay naked in the snow and starved in penance. They indulged themselves in an orgy of sexuality to fulfill Shabbatai’s commandments. Jewish communities all over the world sent emissaries with proclamations of Shabbatai’s messiahship.[It is important to realize that the entire Jewish world of 1665-66 believed that Sabbatai was no mere 'prophet' or 'teacher' but the Promised Messiah and a living incarnation of God. It was the only messianic movement to engult the whole of Jewry; from England to Persia, from Germany to Morocco, from Poland to the Yemen.]
Shabbatai was taken to the Sultan and he was given the choice of death or conversion to Islam. On September 15, 1666, Shabbatai, the messiah, picked up a turban and became a Moslem. Shabbatai was later exiled to Albania after being caught in sexual extravaganzas. He died on Yom Kippur of 1676. Secret cells of Sabbateans continued throughout Europe - and still do to this day...
Out of the wreckage of the Zevi movement a man named Jacob Frank devised another strain of Judaism in which he taught that:
The age of the millennium would never appear until the Jews had exhausted their proclivity for evil. It was therefore necessary for Jews to indulge in whatever evil impulses they had in order to make way for the good.'
Prindle reminds us that at the end of the thirteenth century the Jews were expelled from England, at the beginning of the fourteenth from France, and for the duration, well, they were welcome nowhere. He argues that this sense of grievance grew until with their expulsion from Spain in 1492 their sense of injustice burst into open flames. They swore to take revenge on Europe...
His teaching emphasized the acquisition of wealth and riches, even if by the most fraudulent means. In 1756 rabbis discovered Frank and twenty of his followers conducting a heretical religious orgy. He and his disciples were excommunicated by rabbinical courts everywhere. The Frankists were denounced to the authorities and eventually Frank was again arrested.
To gain his freedom, Frank agreed to convert to Islam. Frank persisted in making secret visits to Poland to confer with his disciples. He remained the leader of most of Sabbateans in Galicia, the Ukraine, and Hungary. They were outwardly Jewish but secretly offended all the Torah prohibitions, especially those about fornication, adultery, and incest. Frank and his followers appealed to Dembrowsky, the Catholic Bishop of Kamenetz-Podolsk, for protection and told the bishop that the Jewish sect to which they belonged rejected the Talmud and recognized only the sacred book of Kabbalah, the Zohar, which they alleged admitted the truth of the Christian doctrine of the Trinity.
The Frankists, issued a proclamation that they were 'almost' Christians, though they did not fully embrace Christianity. They asked for a public debate against the rabbis. The public debate that followed spawned public burnings of the Talmud. These continued until the sudden death of the bishop. Persecutions of Frankists again increased. Many Frankists, including Frank himself, fled Poland.
Frank next asked for protection from the king of Poland, citing his past relationship with Bishop Dmbrowsky. When he returned to Poland, Frank proclaimed himself as the living embodiment of God. He appointed twelve apostles and twelve female concubines to serve him. Frank asked for another public debate. His stated purpose this time was to prove Christianity and to prove the blood libel (the supposed need for Christian blood to make matzah, the brittle flat bread eaten by Jews at Passover.
The public debates took place in 1759. Many of the Frankists agreed to be baptized, including Frank himself. Word got out that some of the Frankists saw Frank as God. Frank was arrested, tried, and exiled to a fortress, where he was confined for thirteen years. His final years were spent living like a king in a luxurious mansion near Frankfort. He was supported by huge gifts from followers around the world. He died suddenly in 1791. Frank’s work Words of the Master were still being published in the 1820’s.
Adam Mickiewicz, the famous Polish poet, was a Frankist.Likewise, many in the Polish nobility were Frankists well into the nineteenth century.Clandestine communities of Frankists are still thought to exist to this day.
Frankist agents acted in times of French Revolution, like Moses Dobruchka who entered the Jacobins as Junius Frey and ascended to the top of Freemasonry. Many of the Frankist saw Napoleon Bonaparte as a potential Messiah.
Prindle believes that sufficient evidence exists to show that for two millennia Jewish activities have been grounded on an inviolable ideology, tight organization and precise coordination. He claims that after the catastrophic failure of Sabbatai Zevi the 'wisemen' of Judaism devised a new strategy. In the future they would never again recognize a human messiah as so many rabbis had done with previous messianic claimants, but instead they would place their hopes in their whole people in the form of a revolution. Moreover, Prindle says that a clear explication of the plan and its objectives are found in Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver’s, A History Of Messianic Speculation In Israel, 1927.
Prindle argues that Freud consciously manipulated his psychoanalytic doctrines as part of program of subversion and revenge aimed at destroying Western Civilization insofar as it was based on Christianity and especially Catholic Christianity.
Freud did not discover the Unconscious. The Englishman, F. W. H. Myers isolated or identified the subconscious by the name of the unconscious in 1886.
'Freud gave the unconscious a religious or supernatural twist. He seemed to believe that the unconscious has an independent existence outside the mind of man which is beyond man’s control while being wholly evil and opposed to morality, Freud then wished to unleash this conception of the unconscious on the world. He was uniquely prepared to do so. All he had to do was manipulate the symbols of psychoanalysis of which he had full control.'
One has the feeling that Freud leaned much more about the human psyche than he told and that he told what he did with ulterior motives in mind. Those ulterior motives did not go unnoticed at the time. As D. H. Lawrence expressed it in his Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious of 1911:-
'First and foremost the issue is a moral issue. It is not here a matter of reform, new moral values. It is the life or death of all morality. The leaders (Freud, Ferenczi, Abraham) among the psychoanalysts know what they have in hand. Probably most of their followers are ignorant, and therefore psuedo-innocent. But it all amounts to the same thing. Psychoanalysis is out, under a therapeutic disguise, to do away entirely with the moral faculty in man.'
Lawrence put his finger on the criminal intent. Freud was in fact running an Order in which one learned the true intent as one moved from initiate to adept. Freud in fact did wish to destroy the concept of morality and he had his reasons.
What were Freud’s reasons for wanting to destroy the concept of morality?
'Freud was severely emasculated in both his individual ego and in his group ego. He was in fact a practicing homosexual... His group, the Jews, was and is a severely emasculated people. They have been since they walked away from Ur.'
Freud was fond of telling the story of his father and his hat. It seems that Mr. Freud related a story to Sigmund, or Sigismund as he was known then (his Hebrew name significantly was Solomon) of how when he was a young man walking down the street proudly wearing his new hat, a gentile knocked the hat from his head into the gutter, snarling, 'Go get your hat, Jew'.
When Sigmund asked breathlessly what his father did, expecting a heroic response, the old gentleman laconically replied:
'I stepped into the gutter and picked up my hat,' severely disappointing the young boy.
'Since Freud told and retold this story we may be forgiven for believing it had a profound effect on his young conscious and subconscious minds and possibly his 'unconscious' too. On the one hand he may have been so ashamed of his father’s reaction that he shared his emasculation encapsulating it in his subconscious as a fixation. It is possible that this story either made or contributed to his homosexuality. On the other hand we know for a fact that it inflamed his group ego with an ardent desire for revenge against the gentiles'.
Freud’s father came from an area of the Pale known as Galicia. This area is very close to the homeland of the ecstatic variant of Judaism known as Hasidism, and in fact his father was a Hasid. The Hasid sect arose out of the period of the last great Jewish 'Messiah', Sabbatai Zevi.
The Jews realized the true danger to their religious mental projection was Science. There was no religious argument effective against Science. They would have to take a different approach. That approach was to appropriate a science with mumbo jumbo then slowly eviscerate the science of its content while supposedly making it moral or in other words subservient to Jewish religious beliefs.
This required both bold assertions while suppressing discussion or channeling it so that it could be controlled... The date selected for the revolution was the period 1913-1928.
Born in 1856, in 1913 Sigmund Freud was fifty-seven years old. Freud was militantly Jewish.
‘He hated Europeans and the European culture. There is no question but that he intended to replace it with the Jewish culture. At what point he decided to manipulate the emerging science isn’t clear but probably by the time he began attending B’nai B’rith meetings in 1895.’
Freud defamed predecessors, mentors, and rivals while organizing psychoanalysis to exclude any opinion but his own... He organized and controlled the magazines and publishing houses, while he controlled and convened the international congresses. Following the Jewish Cultural model, no dissent was allowed - there is no freedom of expression in the Jewish Culture - if you refused discipline you were merely expelled. Once expelled you were defamed and rendered inconsequential. Marginalized in today’s terms. The only analyst to survive this treatment was C. J. Jung who had an awful lot going for him. I can’t think of another dissident who has survived to the present'.
Prindle believes that Freud coordinated his research with the needs of the scheduled Jewish revolution.
‘By 1910 he had his theories in close to final form. From 1915 on, especially after 1917 he was no longer developing his ideas but organizing them for use by the Revolution...
Thus his concepts of the unconscious and sex were tailored to upset the morality of European civilization. His promulgated notions were meant to confuse and obfuscate. When one combines Freud’s interpretation of the unconscious, sex and emasculation, all of which were worked out by 1915, one has in fact a potent weapon of psychological warfare ...
By the advent of the Russian Revolution then, through his association with B’nai B’rith, Freud had prepared the Jewish cadres for some particularly dirty work... As the Russian Revolution marked the first great success of the Jewish Revolution, Freud now began to manipulate his scientific knowledge of hypnotism and psychology to confuse and obfuscate the minds of the EuroAmerican cultures while keeping his Culture’s mind focused on the work ahead.’
Prindle believes the study of the French Revolution was the role of the men of B’nai ‘B’rith to which Freud was privy.
Little details pop up in his writing. In his 1914 On The History Of The Psychoanalytic Movement , he lets drop a line that the progress of the French Revolution had been charted and understood ... His role as the psychoanalyst would be to prepare the minds of the revolutionaries for the slaughtering to come while he probably also assisted in the damage control applications for the inevitable reaction when the Europeans had realized what the Jews had done’.
Sometime after I wrote the first part of Something Of ValueI read David Bakan’s Freud And The Jewish Mystical Tradition:
‘While Freud rejected Rabbinical religious Judaism he was deeply immersed in the Jewish mystical tradition of the Zohar and Kabbalah. Thus one can discount his claim to be an ‘atheistic’ Jew. Or atheism has a more specific meaning for him.’
Prindle explains that the Zohar, or primary mystical book, which is attributed to the first and second century Rabbi, Simeon Ben Yohai, was reworked in twelfth century Spain by Moses de Leon and reached the Middle East after the expulsion of the Jews from Spain in the sixteenth century. Its influence then was transmitted to the seventeenth century messiah, Sabbatai Zevi.
‘While Freud claimed to be scientific; Mr. Bakan relates almost all of Freud’s psychology to the Kabbalah showing Freud’s dependence on Sabbatianism and Frankism as I indicated in Something Of Value Part I.’
Prindle contends that Freud pretended to work as a scientist while he actually was blending in a bit of science with his Jewish religious material in order to subvert the European moral order.
This editor’s note to 1927’s The Future Of An Illusion says this:
'In the ‘Postscript’ which Freud added in 1935 to his Autobiographical Study he remarked that a ’significant change’ had come about in his writings during the previous decade.
‘My interest... after making a long detour through the natural sciences, medicine, and psychotherapy, returned to the cultural problems which fascinated me long before, when I was a youth scarcely old enough for thinking'.'
Freud was studying the Zohar and Kabbalah at the same time that he was working out the nature of psychoanalysis.
‘Bakan traces strong mystical influences running side by side with what passed for science in Freud’s mind. As Freud persistently says he’s going to ignore facts in favor of projections one must assume that there is more mysticism than science in Freud’s construction of psychoanalysis…
Freud then for all practical purposes abandoned medicine for healing. Then, sometime between 1913 and 1915 he abandoned psychoanalytical research for his ‘cultural’ studies. In other words, he began to apply his psychological studies to the manipulation of cultures through his developing ideas on Group Psychology.’
Prindle reminds us that:
‘Freud had learned that he could develop ’screen’ language to serve up unpalatable meanings in palatable ways. Thus what he says has a reasonable meaning to the uninitiated but has a totally different meaning to the initiated - those with the key. In many ways it is the same as a criminal argot. Those who understand the argot can discuss topics openly while only those with the key can twig it. Ya dig?
[Freud’s] purpose was to knock the whole of European Christianity into the gutter, which is to say the actual persons of Europe. Thus the use of terms like ‘Culture’ and ‘Civilization’ should always be placed in the context of Jews and Europeans. In this manner he avoids the appearance of bigotry and hatred while sounding ’scientific.
Thus from 1915 to 1935 like Dr. Mabuse he sat imprisoned in his projection of reality churning out page after page, volume after volume of criminal plans for the subversion of civilization which is to say of Euroamerican civilization but not Jewish culture.’
He makes a definite point that the ‘illusion’ whose future he is discussing applies only to Europe and Christianity rather than religion in general. Judaism is excluded. Prindle maintains that Freud’s ideas for the subversion of European civilization were carried to America by the international B’nai B’rith organization to be adopted and employed there.
In addition, Prindle argues that the revolutionary plans executed in Europe in 1917 were financed and organized by the world Jewish government based in the US. The Revolution was conducted on an international scale. Hence Jewish revolutionaries left the US for Russia after 1918 to aid in the consolidation going on there.
‘This is really an incredible if repressed story in the Freudian cultural manner. Very Freudian that such phenomenal criminal activity that was best left invisible was repressed into humanity’s unconscious.’
In David Bakan’s view Freud had made ‘a compact with Satan.’
Certainly not in the literal sense but in the figurative sense that Freud would do anything, abandon any moral precepts, to achieve fame. Bakan points out the superscription to Freud’s Interpretation Of Dreams quotes from Virgil: Flectere si nesqueo superos, Acheronta movebo. Translated as: If the gods above are no use to me, then I’ll move all hell. Freud further blurred the line between good and evil or amalgamated the two from the influence of Sabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank who had cast off all morality.
Prindle condemns Freud’s conception of the ‘Unconscious’ as part of Freud’s pact with the powers below against the powers above. Freud invested his projection of the unconscious with the attributes of ‘Satan’ or evil. Prindle insists that this ‘view of the subconscious is a self-serving fiction not based on any science…
This notion is mere fantasy; it cannot be. There is no possibility that the Function of the subconscious doesn’t have a positive Function in and of itself and in relation to the conscious. If you actually think about it for a moment you will realize this must be true; every part of the body works to the benefit of the whole; there can be no exception for the subconscious.’
Now, in the cultural war between Jewish Culture and Western Civilization, or as Jews express it, Christianity, Freud infused the Jewish subconscious with a disregard for morality a la Jacob Frank and Sabbatai Zevi.
‘Any evil was excused so long as it seemed to advance the cultural war…The cold war between Jews and Europeans became a shooting war in the wake of the Great War. Men, money and munitions flowed in a wide steady stream from the United States to Russia. Coordinators established themselves in strategic locations. If one reads [only the] restricted, censored literature the impression is made that horrible anti-Semites harassed and hated innocent unresisting Jews. Jews may have been killed but they were not innocent and unresisting. To the contrary freed from guilt, or supposedly so, by Freudian/Sabbatian/Frankist precepts, abattoirs were established throughout Russia where unsuspecting Russians were led in one door and flowed out the other in liquid form...
All this slaughter was made possible and justified by the doctrines of Freud.’
David Bakan closes his volume with these words:
'Under the ruse of ‘playing the devil’ (Freud) served Sabbatian interests. In this respect, however, just as Freud may be regarded as having infused Kabbalah into science, so may he be regarded as having incorporated science into Kabbalah. Sabbatian-wise, by closing the gap between Jewish culture and Western Enlightenment he acts as the Messiah not only for Jewish culture but for Western culture as well.'
Thus in Bakan’s eyes and according to Freud’s intent Judaism has deconstructed Euroamerican society so the reconstruction according to Jewish cultural mores can commence.
‘In 1914-15 the great modern Jewish cultural adventure was beginning...It was a matter of waiting patiently for opportunity then taking advantage of it. In 1917 the big break came when the German General Ludendorff transported Lenin and his cadre of Jewish revolutionaries to the Finland Station of St. Petersburg. In October Trotsky drove the nail home. The Jews [were] prepared. They had been working out the details for a couple decades or more. At least since Freud joined with his like-minded fellows of B’nai B’rith in 1895.’
Prindle reminds us that Jewish scholars now admit that every national subversive Communist party of this period was over fifty percent Jewish.
Those of Russia and Germany were higher. Freud had been involved in Jewish subversive organizations like the B’nai B’rith for many years.
‘As the master psychologist, an expert in the unconscious, he prepared the Jewish mind for the great task of the millennial years in Central and Eastern Europe, which would require much bloodshed, while formulating his psychological plan of conquest not dissimilar from the military plans of his hero, Hannibal.
The Jewish millennial years began in 1913. The Great War began in 1914. The Bolshevik Revolution occurred in 1917. Introductory Lectures On Psychoanalysis appeared in 1917 even though there must have been an extreme paper shortage; it is not a short book. Freud encoded last minute instructions to the Revolutionists in the book… At this point in 1917 Freud released the inhibitions of millions of Mr. Hydes in Russia, Hungary and Germany…
The unconscious psychoses of the Jewish people who it will be remembered as a group was suffering from severe emasculation were erupting. Emasculation of the Ego is always expressed in a sexual manner. Freud had been preaching the practice of unrestrained sexuality for years. Murder is a sexual act. He was against ‘repression’ you will remember.
With revolutionaries in power in Russia the United States entered the war and defeat of Germany became inevitable. Germany had a huge Communist party which - it is now admitted - was around sixty percent Jewish. Thousands of Jewish revolutionaries intent on to realize the millennium flowed back into Germany from Russia in hopes of achieving the Revolution there, giddy with the hopes of thereby annexing Central and Eastern Europe.’
Prindle raises an obvious question that is always ignored in discussing the revolutions in Russia, Germany and Hungary: where did the money come from to finance the activities of thousands of itinerant revolutionary that flowed from the United States to Russia and from Russia to Germany and Hungary?
‘The Revolution didn’t come free and it didn’t come cheap; there’s a price tag on everything and a very high price tag on this one. On the financial and banking level it was fairly easy; the bankers [Schiff and Marshall] just used other people’s money. Loans are loans and expenditures are expenditures; loans have to be repaid while expenditures are cash out of hand. So for expenditures the money came largely from vice.
One usually thinks of organized crime as Italian or Sicilian while in actuality the organizers were Jewish. Enormous sums were raised by crime especially under the kingpins Arnold Rothstein and Lepke Buchalter. But, lo and behold, when these men died the vast sums that passed through their hands which they could not possibly have spent were nowhere to be found. To all intents and purposes these men died penniless.’
What I’m about to say has been denied and suppressed but the example was before both Hitler and Stalin. In Hungary where Freud had his man Ferenczi to coordinate the Hungarian Jews, Bela Kun seized the government beginning a reign of terror against the gentiles during which thousands of non-Jews were murdered in a horrific sadistic manner commensurate with an emasculated Ego.’
After the Hungarian Communists were overthrown, Bela Kun fled to the Soviet Union.
‘Taking advantage of the chaos in Russia the Jewish American Joint Distribution Committee under the leadership of Schiff and Marshall decided to appropriate the Crimea as a Jewish state.’ Bela Kun was sent down to the Crimea to exterminate the population to make room for the Jews. He was in the process when Lenin died. Stalin then recalled him to Moscow where he was shot. …All these activities were obscured and suppressed. It is forbidden, at least in American universities, to study the subject to this day.
Freud’s circle of psychoanalysts was organized as an Order somewhat along the lines of King Arthur and his court with Freud as king, the psychoanalysts as knights and member of B’nai B’rith as footsoldiers.
Freud would tolerate no deviation from his pronouncements…
After the Great War and the success of the Bolsheviks in Russia matters looked very promising, but with the rise of Hitler in Germany and the success of Stalin in Russia the program stalled. Not yet aware of the covert actions of Stalin in Russia the Order’s position in Germany and Austria became precarious. Consequently the Order fled Germany for Great Britain and the United States…
Some of the Order stayed in London while the bulk continued on to the United States of America. It didn’t take too much genius to figure which of the two countries would be the safest, while the United States would provide scope for worldwide operations.
Once in the United States the Order set out to capture the country’s two culture capitols, New York and Los Angeles. New York was already the Freudian capitol of the US while Los Angeles was not far behind, being at the same time the movie capitol of the world wherein the Semites had created an empire of their own. On prepared ground the Order was easily able to direct movies and publishing into Freudian themes of the inevitability of the unconscious and its concentration on sex and pornography'."