The System Is Working To Hide Its Own Failings!

Winston Marshall interviewed Telegraph journalist, Alison Pearson, on 15 November 2025.

Alison said:

"So, Nikki as I call her is an asylum case worker. There are about six and a half thousand of those distributed over 19 centers around the UK... This year alone 39,000 young mainly young undocumented males have come across the channel in small boats. So I went to meet Nikki expecting to hear that things were not great, but she said, 'You're going to be very shocked.' And I was very, very shocked, absolutely shattered to be honest.

And one of the first things she (Nikki, an asylum case worker) said to me was, "I keep thinking that one day I'm going to turn on the TV. It's inevitable that I will see a man I've granted asylum to who has or murdered a girl like one of my girls. Nikki has three daughters... Nikki thinks there are hundreds of thousands. 

The official numbers were given are just the tip of the iceberg. He was wandering around Eping asking school girls to make babies with him. Nikki said they got a memo saying the police and terrorist checks would be suspended. There are sex offenders on the loose who've been granted asylum. So that's her motive in wanting to speak out about what's happening...

I guess perhaps the most shocking thing was that she has to grant asylum to men who have they know have been exposing themselves in children's play areas uh in Britain. Men who have been stalking girls, uh men who are on the sex offenders register, men who could be up on a rape charge and they would still uh be uh considered for asylum. And the reason for that is that the law as it stands at the moment is that unless someone seeking asylum has been sentenced to 12 months in jail, uh they're still considered for asylum.

And what Nikki was explaining is that they when you have an applicant, she said they've got to call them customers now, which gives you a bit of a clue as to um the attitude. So the customers who are these young undocumented males who've destroyed their papers and broken into our country, she will do a police check and an international terrorist check. And the police check will come up and it will say Mr. X exposed himself in a playground. But because, say, that guy is from Afghanistan, Eritrea, Sudan or Kuwait, those are four countries where effectively they're not allowed to deny asylum to anyone from there... This absolutely infuriates me...

Now the Home Office, when my Telegraph piece was published, we put it to them and they they denied that there was such a thing as automatic asylum to people from certain countries. We know that isn't true. And we also know that if you claim to be a Syrian from 2021 to 2023, 99% of Syrians claiming asylum have been granted asylum. So that's effectively, if you say you're from particular country and, obviously, as Nikki pointed out, most African males are now saying they're Eritrean...

Obviously not all the people across the Channel are going to be rapists or and terrorists. A proportion of them are right. So we don't need them in our country. We don't need to run that risk. That risk should be foremost in the minds of the state. This government exists to protect the public, right? But it's absolutely warped to prioritize the fact that these men will be in danger possibly if they're returned to their country of origin. 

That's not our problem. Our problem is a 14-year-old girl in Epping walking to school coming face to face with this Ethiopian guy who who says he wants to make babies with her and then the lady walking past who comes to intervene then she's assaulted as well. Why should that woman and girl be exposed to that risk? Why? Where are their human rights?... They can't go and shout and site article and three. It's just a racket...

There's a whole immigration law firms that are built on constant vexacious claims to keep these guys in the country, right? They should be shut down.. Who is speaking up for the women and girls?..

We have to leave the ECR. We have to repeal the Human Rights Act here. Any of the legislation that the immigration lawyers can use to string out the cases for their clients. Anyone who enters our country illegally. So...4 essentially, anyone who's broken into our country is moved removed immediately to a detention center and then they'll be taken to an aeroplane and then they will be deposited somewhere to be decided. I don't know, we must have got some islands in the South Atlantic. 

It's just it's got to be drastic because it is an absolute crisis. And what I find so strange since speaking to Nikki is I just expect to see this every day on the news. Why isn't it on the news every day? Why are we not afraid of what's being done every single day?

Last Thursday, Friday, Saturday, 2,000 men across the Atlantic, young men of fighting age. What are we doing? Where are they going to go? What's going to happen to the women in the communities where they're dumped?

One of the most extraordinary things when my piece was published and we put the various claims to the Home Office was they didn't deny that sex offenders and men who'd been guilty of gross and indecent behavior, they didn't say that doesn't happen because they know it does happen. 

So, I guess was one of many strong feelings I have is absolute incredulity that the system is designed to protect foreign males who've broken into our country and to hell with the safety of women and children...

We have had in Epping where Hades Kabatu got off a boat and eight days later, with new clothes given to him by Britain, with a nice hotel to stay in given to him by Britain, with £50 pocket money given to him by Britain, he was wandering around Epping asking school girls to make babies with him... 

If you import men from countries which have deeply misogynist, or as we would see them unpleasant attitudes to women, which we can see in Afghanistan, where women aren't allowed to speak outside anymore. If you get a guy from that country and he comes ashore on the Kent coast, he doesn't become Hugh Grant when he gets out of the boat, does he? He still imports those values. And I would say uh women and children in our country are in extreme peril.

Yeah, that's from this uh invasion. Invasion. Do you remember Suella Braverman when she was Home Secretary used the word invasion and all of the usual suspects said, "Well, we don't approve of her choice of language." And you thought that's what we're up against. So, let's allow our women and children to be raped and stalked as long as no one uses the inappropriate language...

The reality is is that the bar is now set so low that anybody from Eritrea or Somalia or Sudan would be at risk. So the logical conclusion is anyone who manages to get here from some of these countries, we couldn't send them back. But ultimately that's clearly a suicidal policy for our country, isn't it? So, I think that that phrase suicidal empathy, whereby we now see the point of view of everyone except our own people, that spells tragedy for our country...

If you want my honest opinion I think they are trying to hide the scale of the problem... The system is working to hide its own failings. That's its main aim. Its main aim is not the safety of the British people. I can't emphasize that enough. This is about deceit. It's an absolute crisis."

Etc. etc. etc.

THEY are at war with us, ladies and gentlemen. The animals at the top of the tree are at war with us. Our politicians are their Colonels and Captains, the immigrants are their foot-soldiers.

If we don't stop them doing what they they're doing then the British people will vanish into the pages of history. It is THAT dramatic. It is THAT real.

Sharpen your pitchforks.