Dr. David Martin, Chairman of M-CAM International Risk Management, testifies on patent law and patents, as they pertain to the alleged pandemic, before Reiner Fuellmich and other worthies.
Introduced to BrandNewTube on 9 July 2021.
A very great deal of hair-raising testimony here.
Thank you, David.
And thank you, Reiner, for enabling such revelations.
"Over the rejection of the patent examiner, and after having to pay an appeal fine in 2006 and 2007, the CDC overrode the patent office's rejection and ultimately in 2007 got the patent on SARS coronavirus. Every statement the CDC has made that this was in the public interest is falsifiable by their own PAID BRIBE to the patent office! They paid an additional fee to keep their application private...In April 2019, eight months before folks started toppling over in Wuhan, China, and, allegedly, dying on the spot, I said this on Twitter:
The Sequoia patent on coronavirus treatment was issued and published before the CDC patent on coronavirus was allowed. The only way Sequoia could know information in CDC patent is by insider means, because CDC had paid to keep it secret. This is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering and collusion. This is not a theory, it is evidence. This is a RICO case...
On June 5, 2008 – which was around the time that DARPA took an active interest in coronavirus as a biological weapon – Ablynx, now part of Sanofi, filed a series of patents targeting what we've been told are novel features of SARS-CoV-2. They targeted the polybasic cleavage site for SARS-CoV, the novel spike protein and the ACE-2 receptor binding domain. These are allegedly novel to SARS-CoV-2, and all of these were patented on June 5, 2008. The patents were issued between November 24, 2015 (US patent 9193780; this came out after the moratorium on gain-of-function research, after the MERS outbreak in the Middle East), followed in 2016, 2017, 2019 by a series of patents covering not only RNA strands but also sub-components of gene strands, all issued to Ablynx and Sanofi...
If you actually take what they report to be novel, you find 73 patents issued between 2008 and 2019 which have the elements that were allegedly novel in SARS-CoV-2. Specifically the polybasic cleavage site, the ACE-2 receptor binding domain and the spike protein. There was no outbreak of SARS because we had engineered all the elements of that. By 2016, a paper by Ralph Baric was funded during the gain-of-function moratorium, saying SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence...
Statement made in 2015 by Peter Daszak; of EcoHealth Alliance, who relayed NIAID funding to Wuhan lab, later the only American sent with WHO to investigate same lab; statement reported in a National Academies Press publication February 12, 2016:
'We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. WE NEED TO USE THAT HYPE TO OUR ADVANTAGE to get to the real issues. Investors will respond IF THEY SEE A PROFIT at the end of the process.'
Peter Daszak, the person who was independently corroborating the Chinese non-lab-leak non-theory because there wasn't a lab leak, this was an intentional bio-weaponisation of spike proteins to inject into people to get them addicted to a pan-coronavirus vaccine. This has nothing to do with a pathogen that was released and every study that's ever been launched to try to verify a lab leak is a red herring. THERE IS NOTHING THAT IS NEW; ZERO. 73 patents on everything clinically novel, all issued before 2019!...
Merck introduced the notion of what they called "the new normal", which became a branded campaign adopted by the WHO, the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which was the board upon which the Chinese director of their center for disease control, Dr. Elias of the Gates Foundation, and Anthony Fauci sat together. The first introduction of the 'new normal' campaign, which was about getting people to accept a universal pan-influenza, pan-coronavirus vaccine, was adopted January 6, 2004...
Moderna knew it was going to be placed in the front of the line with respect to development of a vaccine in March 2019. At that time, for reasons that are not transparent, they amended a series of rejected patent filings to specifically make reference to a deliberate or accidental release of coronavirus... In November, they entered into a cooperative R&D agreement with UNC Chapel Hill with respect to getting the spike protein to put inside the LNP, so that THEY ACTUALLY HAD A CANDIDATE VACCINE BEFORE WE HAD A PATHOGEN allegedly running around!...
From 2016 until 2019, at every one of NIAID advisory council board meetings, Anthony Fauci lamented that he could not find a way to get people to accept the universal influenza vaccine...
By March of 2019, in the amended patent filings of Moderna, we see THERE'S AN EPIPHANY that says:
'WHAT IF THERE WAS AN ACCIDENTAL OR INTENTIONAL RELEASE OF A RESPIRATORY PATHOGEN?'The phrase is exactly recited in the book A World at Risk, which is the scenario put together by the WHO in September 2019 – MONTHS BEFORE THERE WAS AN ALLEGED PATHOGEN – which says:
'WE NEED A COORDINATED GLOBAL EXPERIENCE OF A RESPIRATORY PATHOGEN RELEASE, WHICH, BY SEPTEMBER 2020, MUST PUT IN PLACE A UNIVERSAL CAPACITY FOR PUBLIC RELATIONS MANAGEMENT, CROWD CONTROL AND THE ACCEPTANCE OF A UNIVERSAL VACCINE MANDATE!'The language of an intentional release of a respiratory pathogen was written into the scenario that 'must be completed by September 2020.'
This is the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board's unified statement!...
Egregiously, we have Peter Daszak himself stating that WE NEED TO CREATE PUBLIC HYPE TO GET THE PUBLIC TO ACCEPT THE MEDICAL COUNTERMEASURE OF A PAN-CORONAVIRUS VACCINE! What makes that most ludicrous is that the WHO declared coronavirus a dead interest – that we had eradicated coronavirus as a concern. So why, after having eradicated it in 2007 and 2008, did we start spending billions of dollars globally on a vaccine for a thing that had been eradicated by declaration in 2008?
THIS WAS SEEN AS A HIGHLY MALLEABLE BIOWEAPON. BY 2005, IT WAS UNQUESTIONABLY A WEAPON OF CHOICE. The illusion that we continue to see well-meaning people get trapped in, is conversations about whether we're having a vaccine for a virus. We're not. WE'RE INJECTING A SPIKE PROTEIN MRNA SEQUENCE WHICH IS THE RESULT OF A COMPUTER SIMULATION, NOT DERIVED FROM NATURE, of a sequence which has been known and patented for years.
The ludicrous nature of the story that this is somehow prophylactic or preventative flies in the face of 100% of the evidence. THE EVIDENCE MAKES IT 100% CLEAR THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO EFFORT BY ANY PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY TO COMBAT THE VIRUS. THIS IS ABOUT GETTING PEOPLE INJECTED WITH THE KNOWN-TO-BE-HARMFUL S1 SPIKE PROTEIN!...
There is no such thing as an alpha, beta, gamma or delta variant. What is desperately sought is a degree to which individuals can be coerced into accepting something they would not otherwise accept...
A failed decade-long pan-influenza vaccine mandate... was desperately promoted by governments around the world. They failed and they decided if the influenza doesn't deliver on the public promise of getting everybody to get an injection, let's change the pathogen. You need to create the illusion of demand, and THERE IS NOTHING RIGHT NOW THAT DOES A BETTER JOB CREATING THE ILLUSION OF DEMAND THAN THE URGENCY OF AN EVENT YOU'VE MANUFACTURED...
The perpetrators themselves said they needed to get the public to accept a pan-coronavirus vaccine countermeasure, and they needed the media to create the hype, and investors would follow where they see profit."
No comments:
Post a Comment