Dr Mike Yeadon debunks the asymptomatic-spread and variant lies!

Del Bigtree interviewed Mike Yeadon, the former Vice President of Pfizer, on 10 June 2021.

"So when they got to the point where they told us we needed to 'lock down', in March 2020 in the UK, I remember thinking this is just really strange... We were told 'three weeks to flatten the curve'... After the three weeks two things happened: one is, the peak of daily deaths had clearly passed in the UK, we could see it falling...

I was shocked when the government, after three weeks, said 'we're going to extend this lockdown'... At that point I'd done enough thinking to be absolutely certain that lockdowns couldn't possibly work...

I'm afraid that everything that our government and their scientific advisors have told us for a year and a half are all lies. ALL LIES, they're not just a little bit wrong, it's not just a matter of opinion, I'm going to take you through the evidence that says the people who are advising my government I respect as professionals, that means they know everything I know. So, when I conclude it's definitely not true... that means I know that THEY know that too, and that means they're telling untruths deliberately, we call that lying. It's not a frightening virus, we're lied to about absolutely everything. I think the objective is to make us receptive to the vaccines... I think there are serious crimes going on...

Esteemed epidemiologist, Dr. John Ioannidis, working at Stamford in America, has been tracking this infection round the world for over a year and he's recognised by the WHO, he'll often have these reports on the WHO website. When you look at the global infection/fatality ratio, it's a measure of how dangerous is this virus, it turns out it's a little bit more than seasonal influenza. A typical season with influenza kills one in a thousand people, nearly always people at the end of their lives who are vulnerable and old and ill. And SARS-COV-2, it's about .14, .15, so it is a little bit worse but it's in the same ball park. I would say it's NOT worse than bad seasonal influenzas but worse than the average.

And yet, that's not the impression you're given. Governments give us the impression, and all of their policy responses give you the impression, that nothing has been as bad as this than, say, than the first world war, 1918 (Spanish) flu. And it's simply NOT true.

It's one the things that makes me very angry. There are some really good treatments that are well evidenced that have been hidden from us and sick people have been deprived of excellent, safe therapy in order to continue people's fear, unfortunately. That's the situation. So, it's not that dangerous a virus unless you are very close to the end of life, very frail and, usually, also ill...

The best epidemiologist in the world to test the situation said it's a little worse than typical flu... The next thing they told us is, implied they told us, is there are no treatments. That's simply not true. We know that, over the last year and a bit, lots of physicians... Dr. Peter McCullough... he just refused to accept what he called 'treatment nihilism.' If you get sick you jusst phone the hospital and they just say, 'stay at home'm and only if you get so sick that you can't cope, then come to a hospital'... He, like other doctors, said, 'well, we know how to do some things for viral replication, for inflammation, why are we trying stuff?'

And so, he and others... Pierre Kory, Dev Zelenko and Didier Raoult in France, they have tested and proved things like Hydroxychloroquine used early in infections can reduce viral replication... At any stage in the disease you could use Ivermectin, it clearly reduces inflammation in the lungs. If you do get inflammation... good old inhaled steroids, used for asthma, and Cope (Anacin - Aspirin/caffeine combination), and there are some good anti-inflammatories... So, there are four, maybe, really good drugs and, had these been made available, then, honestly, I think we'd have been through this in a couple of months... Why is what's happening happening? This makes no sense...

Early in the summer, I started looking at what they were doing for diagnostics, using this PCR test... It's a very powerful technique, but it's NOT a good technique for diagnosing viral infections, as Kary Mullis, who won a Nobel Prize for the invention, told us repeatedly. It's good at detecting things. A piece of DNA or RNA... They were being sneaky, you know, the people working in the UK, they refused to disclose how many cycles they were using. They refused to use an internal standard and they claimed they didn't have samples of the virus and I just thought, 'how can you not have an internal standard?'

For people who don't know, if you're using a diagnostic test, then you should... use the thing you're trying to detect, and put it into the test, and show whether it can detect it. Then you can use it, that method, to work out where to position the standadard curve, as it were, when you try and test a clinical sample. And all I could see was that they were NOT using these standards, and they were using as much amplification as the machines would use rather than the amount you should use to work out if infection was present. And by the summer I was absolutely certain they were, basically, they were turning up the amps to eleven! Over amplifying it, not using internal standards...

By about this time last year... workers had tested hundreds of people who had SARS COV-2 and they'd worked out the relationship between symptoms, the number of cycles of this test before you could detect whether they had the virus present or not and here's a really imprtant thing, whether they could culture the virus, grow the virus on, shall we say, in cells. And they found that, when you got positive tests beyond about 25 cycles, it became more and more difficult to be able to infect some cells in a culture dish. In other words, there wasn't enough live virus there to deliberately infect a culture dish which you're TRYING to infect. For me, I drew the line and thought, 'well, OK, if you're over about 25 cycles, if it makes more cycles than that to show snippets of this virus, then there's not enough virus there to make you infectious at all'...

In the UK, I think they were using 39 cycles and, as you say, I've heard over 40. Each cycle doubles the amount of material, roughly, in this test. And so they were multiplying, believe it or not, I did the maths, a trillion-fold! And so, as the inventor said, the lower the limit of detection is one molecule. One molecule, theoretically, it, literally, could be wafting around the room I'm sitting in, it couldn't possibly make me ill. But if you run very high cycles in PCR you can end up with a false-positive really. You can end up with test that you declare positive but you use such cheating circumstances, contrived circumstances, you wouldn't rely on it. What it doesn't do, is tell you that the person is clinically ill and it doesn't tell you that they're infectious. And isn't that what we want to know? Am I ill?...

I was convinced by mid year that there were BAD ACTORS operating in this, at least in the testing side, that would produce a scare story, that there were more cases than there really were... To be honest I thought it was, first, like a financial reset. It was all locked down while we pretend there's a worse virus than there is and something will happen, that probably as sophisticated as it was. But, when we got later in the year, I'm afraid I came to the conclusion, it's a big claim what I'm going to say but it's, literally, every single one of the central narrative points that the government... tells you about this virus, and what you should do, they're all lies.

We've talked about the exaggeration and exaggerated severity, that makes people very scared. You don't tell them about the treatments, which is just dreadful. People have died in my country, tens of thousands, I think, have died who probably could have been saved. So, I will accuse, right now, the scientific advisors to my goverment, and senior Ministers, of mass murder. I want you, I want you, I want to see you guys in the dock because that's what you've done!" etc. etc. etc. .

Not just me any more, is it?

Wake up, folks. If you've allowed them to inject you with God knows what, that's too bad. The best you can do now, I reckon, is to ensure that they do not stick your kids with it too. Well, there may be other things you can do but are you up for it? If you're the kind of person who has deliberately kept your eyes averted from the unpleasant truth over the course of the last few decades, as others were trying to get you to look and see, you're probably never going to wreak revenge upon those who persuaded you to do something to yourself that may have caused you irreparable harm.

So, keep hiding under the bed, eyes shut tight and shivering. Others will do the dirty work. Just make sure all the doors and windows and whatnot are locked and bolted when they come for your children.