Saturday, 12 March 2016

Randomly killing white people

On 14 June 14 2014, the Malcolm X Movement held its first public event, 'STRIKE THE EMPIRE BACK,' in Notting Hill, West London.
Aamer Rahman said this at that event:
"I do think about randomly killing white people... when I do think about randomly killing white people... it's like a polite question I ask myself. 'Can we kill white people?... seems like a good time'...

All the people I would potentially murder would be straight, white men. I don't think that's controversial. I think that's a community initiative we can all get involved with on a local level. So organise yourselves into small groups, go house to house, get it done... Revolution's not gonna start itself guys."

And you know what?

This guy gets to say what he says without fear of any repercussion.

This guy isn't a 'racist.' It's only 'straight, white men' who can be 'racist.' This guy isn't preaching hatred. It's only 'white people' (and the odd Muslim hate preacher - all of whom have big, black beards and some of whom inspire 7/7/2005 bombers) who preach hatred.

He may be a revolutionary but, hey, Fidel and Che Guevara were revolutionaries, weren't they? And they, and most of the other anti-White folks in all human history, were super-cool. So that's OK.

QUESTION: If Jeremy Corbyn had been sitting in that audience, and no cameras were recording the event, do you think he'd have laughed along? Do you think he might have clapped Aamer Rahman on the back after the event? Do you think he'd have invited him for a drink and told him to keep up the good work?

Or do you think he'd have brought the meeting to a close and used his mobile phones to inform the police that a Muslim foreigner was inciting racial hatred and fomenting revolution?

Yeah. That's what I think too.

How many of the 650 MPs we elected in May 2015 do you think would have turned a blind eye to the anti-White hatred on show? More than would have made a fuss, that's for sure.

And yet the patriot ends up in jail for 'offending' the tender feelings of the professional offence taker.

Wikipedia tells us this:
"In February 2015, Joshua Bonehill-Paine was arrested by officers investigating allegations of inciting racial hatred relating to 'two visual and written publications on the internet,' and released on bail...

In June 2015, Bonehill announced his intention to join a New Dawn Party demonstration in Golders Green, an area of north London with a large Jewish minority, on Saturday 4 July 2015.  
Bonehill stated his intention to destroy Israeli flags by hand and tread upon them... and said he would be burning copies of the Talmud, a Jewish holy book, in a 'private ceremony.' Posts to Bonehill's website featured Auschwitz-Birkenau imagery and joked that the demonstration would be an 'absolute gas.'  
On 25 June he was arrested by the Metropolitan Police and charged with inciting racial hatred contrary to the Public Order Act 1986. 
Four days later, he was remanded in custody at Westminster Magistrates' Court. He was refused bail at a Southwark Crown Court hearing on 13 July. At the next hearing on 21 September, he pleaded 'absolutely not guilty,' and was again remanded in custody.  
The trial began at Southwark Crown Court on 14 December 2015. Mark Weekes for the prosecution described a poster on Bonehill-Paine's website which... 'trivialises and mocks the death of millions of Jews during the Third Reich,' and said that 'the lightning bolt in the ‘O’ of Golders Green is believed to be a reference to the lightning-flash SS logo. To super-impose that on an area with a large Jewish population is incitement.' 
On 16 December, Bonehill was convicted of inciting racial hatred against Jews. He was sentenced to three years and four months imprisonment."
Now I ask you, does the publication of the graphic below at Joshua Bonehill's website, together with the other, really rather harmless stuff, warrant three years four months in jail, when a foreigner who preaches revolution and the murder of white folks ins't even questioned?

It would appear that the powers-that-be consider some more equal than others.

Do you know who was behind the introduction of the race laws in this country, ladies and gentlemen? Do you know who was responsible for criminalising us and imposing punitive sentences upon us if we dared to 'incite racial hatred' against a 'vulnerable minority?'

Well, the 'vulnerable minority' in this case turns out to be anything but vulnerable. Aggressive, self-serving, ungrateful, malicious - yes, but 'vulnerable? Not hardly.

Check out the Jewish role in the construction of the laws that saw Joshua Bonehill jailed for three years and four months.

Here's another example of what can happen if you offend a professional offence-taker. 

On 20 August 2014, The Guardian reported thus:
"An internet troll accused of sending an anti-Semitic message to Labour MP Luciana Berger has been sentenced to four weeks in prison... Garron Helm, 21... tweeted a picture of the MP with a Holocaust yellow star superimposed on her forehead, with the hashtag 'Hitler was right.' 
The tweet, which referred to Berger as a ‘communist Jewess,' read: 'You can always trust a Jew to show their true colours eventually'... 
Berger, the MP for Liverpool Wavertree, said she hoped the jail term would deter would-be trolls. 'This sentence sends a clear message that hate crime is not tolerated in our country,' she said. 'I hope this case serves as an encouragement to others to report hate crime whenever it rears its ugly head'."
But Luciana, hate crime, REAL HATE CRIME, you know, the type where foreigners preach the 'random killing' of 'white people' IS tolerated. Aamer Rahman said what he said in June 2014 and, as far as I know, he has NEVER been questioned.

And Luciana, do you REALLY think that, if I reported this 'hate crime,' the authorities would do anything about it? I mean nothing has been done in the last 18 months, why would you and yours do anything about it now?

I wonder, will my telling you about this 'encourage' you to report it, Luciana?

Luciana? Luciana! It's all gone quiet over there. In fact, it's been quiet for some time. Luciana blocks my tweets. (You are blocked from following @lucianaberger and viewing @lucianaberger's Tweets)

One ultra-pertinent question too many from yours truly, I'm afraid.

Luciana is one of the many MPs and big shot officials who block me on Twitter. I ought to keep a record of the conversations and what leads up to my being blocked. But I don't. I get into the mickey-taking, info-introducing swing and that's me gone, I'm afraid.

Nevertheless, I have been able to retrieve the following:

Michael Graham ‏@Ironwand 31 Oct 2014:
"@NorthWestFOI @DavidWardMP @lucianaberger 
Jailing lads for 'offensive' tweets encourage more. BTW, Luciana, does Gaza slaughter offend you?" ‏
"@NorthWestFOI @DavidWardMP @lucianaberger  
My replies don't show up in your timeline. Now why should that be?" 
"@paulwaugh @lucianaberger 
Yesterday I asked the ex-Director of Labour Friends of Israel (Luciana) is she was offended by the Gaza Genocide. No reply." 
Elizabeth Day @elizabday 
" This is horrific MT @LabourEoin: Labour MP @LucianaBerger is being targeted with the worst form of Anti-Semitic abuse"
Michael Graham ‏@Ironwand:
"@elizabday @LabourEoin @lucianaberger If a Jewish chap criticises Jewish behaviour, is that anti-Semitic, Liz? e.g. "
No response from Luciana or Liz. But Luciana did, as previously stated, block me.

They don't like it up 'em, you see. The uncomfortable truth, that is.

Politicians kill, ladies and gentlemen. 

In foreign countries, they buy up mercenary criminality, arm it, and set upon legitimate government, after which they drop bombs upon the innocent. In OUR countries, they import those with light years of righteous grievance in tow and, when they preach revolutionary hatred, do nothing to stop it.

And, as they thus preach, they are, of course, inflicting all manner of criminal unpleasantness upon the host population, ethnically cleansing us from our own ancient stamping grounds and, when we complain, claiming 'hurt feelings' and accusing us of 'racism' ad nauseam.

The politicians who invited them in ignore all of this and trumpet the outrageousness of our mostly rather mild responses to a variety of extreme provocation.

For more than sixty years now British politicians have been beyond treacherous. Truly, they are and were the abiding 'enemy within.'

Just in case Luciana, Jeremy, John and co. are looking in, here's a little more 'we're coming to get you' stuff from another recent import:

On 19 February 2016, London-based 'political analyst' and blogger, Sukant Chandan, of Global Civilians for Peace in Libya, said this on RT TV:
"The New migrants... when they come here from Africa and Asia and Latin America... everyone obeys the law, they respect the law, they respect their neighbours but there's a very dangerous, pernicious new Fascism emerging that's essentialising these new migrants and refugees as all rapists, all criminals, all terrorists, it's a nonsense.

I'll tell you one thing: black and Asian people should come here in the hundreds of millions. It’s not right that for 500 years, imperialism has looted our countries of all our wealth, has destroyed our countries. We will come here, we have been coming here, and WE WILL CONTINUE TO COME HERE IN THE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS until, indeed, as Gaddafi said, EUROPE WILL TURN BLACK!"

And again:

Compare and contrast, ladies and gentlemen: Joshua Bonehill and Garron Helm versus Aamer Rahman and Sukant Chandan.

Two of the above draw jail time, two do not. If the offences of Joshua and Garron offend you more than the pronouncements of Rahman and Chandan, I think it's safe to say that you do not wish the British people well.

No comments:

Post a Comment