Thursday, 2 April 2015


Most of the US Neoconservatives who began to clamour for a second war with Iraq almost as soon as the first one ended in 1991, were Jewish. 

Without the enormously influential input of a few dozen highly placed American Jews, Gulf War II, and all the horror that has followed since, would, almost certainly, not have taken place.

Just after Iraq was invaded for the second time in 2003, Tam Dalyell, the Father of the House of Commons, suggested in the American magazine Vanity Fair that several members of Chairman Blair’s entourage were a part of a 'Jewish cabal,' intent on stoking up the fires of war.

He echoed his accusations on Radio 4's World at One, saying that the government of the USA was being 'unduly influenced by a cabal of Jewish advisers.' He added:
"There is far too much Jewish influence in the United States… The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, I was thinking of Wolfowitz, Deputy Defence Minister Perle, Bolton, Assistant Secretary of State, Feith, Adelman, Abrams and Fleischer. Those people drive this policy…  
I am worried about my country being led up the garden path on a Likudnik Sharon agenda... Straw, Mandelson and co. are leading a tremendous drive to sort out the Middle East."
Dalyell also singled out Lord Michael Levy, 'Lord Cashpoint' as he became known in the media, for special criticism, saying he was the 'one person about whom I am extremely concerned.'

Tony Blair had ennobled Levy in 1997, the same year he became Prime Minister, and elevated him to the pseudo post of his 'personal envoy to the Middle East' a year later.
"I believe his influence has been very important on the Prime Minister" said Tam, "and has led to what I see as this awful war and the sack of Baghdad.”
Levy, the former manager of Alvin Stardust (Bernard Jewry) and Blair's favourite tennis partner, was the leading fundraiser for the Labour Party from 1994 to 2007.

Of course, when you are brave enough to voice uncertainty about a bloke the Jerusalem Post describes as 'the notional leader of British Jewry,' the accusations and denunciations are liable to come thick and fast and even the longest serving member of the House of Commons can expect no quarter.

On 7 May 2003, Jonathan Freedland’s Guardian essay, 'That is a racist slur' all but called for Tam’s head:
“This episode is a test for Britain. American journalists covering the Dalyell story say the same comments would be a career-ender in Washington… We needn't detain ourselves too long consigning the errant MP's argument to the dust pile where it belongs…

It would be good if Labour and British society in general found a way to demonstrate that it holds no place for such poison…

Real anti-semites… say that Jews are behind everything. The Nazis used to depict the Jew as the master Bolshevik and master capitalist... But this kind of warped logic can have no place among liberals or the left…

If Zionists are constantly accused of having dual loyalties, of wielding untold power, of pursuing a secret agenda to reshape the world, all classic charges long hurled at the Jews, then one has to wonder whether one is hearing the same racist slur now voiced by Tam Dalyell.”
The suggestion being, of course, that such ‘classic charges long hurled at the Jews’ were invariably unjustified and based upon the ‘warped logic’ of ‘errant’ ‘racists’ and ‘anti-Semites' like Tam.

Therfore, according to Freedland, what he said must be untrue and 'consigned to the dust pile.'

David Aaronovich, possibly the most hawkish journalistic contributor to the Iraq debate prior to the 2003 invasion, subsequently described Freedland's analysis as ‘devastating and factual’ and Tam’s as ‘anti-Semitic stereotyping.’ He added:
“Let me spell it out for you. There is no all-powerful Jewish lobby… There are no Elders and there are no Protocols.” (The Guardian - 27 May 2003)
Check out the absence of Elders and Protocols here.

Before we take a look at some of the ‘classic charges’ that Freedland’s ‘factual’ article insists must be ‘consigned to the dust pile,’ take a look at what the Israeli historian and Oxford professor, Avi Shlaim, said during the course of the 16 November 2009 Channel 4 documentary, 'Inside Britain's Israel Lobby:'
“Something became skewed in British politics when an unelected friend of the Prime Minister had so much influence over British policy towards the middle east. In this sense, Michael Levy damaged Britain’s reputation in the Middle East. 
There are some people in the Jewish community in Britain who listen to the news, monitor the news and are too quick to start protesting to the BBC. Their complaints are usually unjustified… 
There is a split in the Jewish community about Israel. The leaders tend to be blindly pro-Israeli. The Israel lobby does represent a narrow right-wing agenda… 
Calling critics of Israel ‘anti-Semitic’ has become a deliberate tactic among some of Israel's more strident lobby groups."
You can say that again, Avi. Freedland and Aaronovich take note.

Freedland's fact.

1) ‘The Nazis used to depict the Jew as the master Bolshevik and master capitalist.’

True, but it wasn’t just the Nazis. Let's take another look at Winston Churchill's 8 February 1920 article, Zionism versus Bolshevism:
"As bankers and industrialists (master capitalists?) they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia’s economic resources... In politics their support has been given, for the most part, to liberal and progressive movements... In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the international Jews...  
This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (USA), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.  
It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, A definite recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire. 
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism (Master Bolsheviks?) and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, THE MAJORITY OF THE LEADING FIGURES ARE JEWS. MOREOVER, THE PRINCIPAL INSPIRATION AND DRIVING POWER COMES FROM THE JEWISH LEADERS...  
In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary commissions for combating counter revolution has been take by Jews... 
The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany... Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing."
The Times of 12 April 1919 quoted Churchill thus:
"Of all the tyrannies in history, the Bolshevist tyranny is the worst, the most destructive, and the most degrading. It is sheer humbug to pretend that it is not far worse than German militarism. [The atrocities are] incomparably more hideous, on a larger scale, and more numerous than any for which the Kaiser is responsible." (Connaught Rooms, London)
So, according to the then Secretary of War, what 'Trotsky' and 'the international Jews' created in Russia was 'the worst tyranny in history!' Bit of a difference between that and the Nazi's 'master Bolshevik,' don't you think? Even more of a difference between what Churchill says and Tam Dalyell's tentative 'Jewish cabal.'

As for the 'bankers and industrialists' busily promoting 'the development of Russia’s economic resources,' doesn't this suggest Churchill and the Nazis weren't a million miles apart on the 'master capitalist' score?

Would you argue with Winston, Jonathan? Are you going to call him nasty names just for telling the plain, unvarnished truth? I mean, he was a bit better placed to know what was going on at the time than you, wasn't he?

Here's another little bit of Bolshevik/capitalist-busting history for you. In 1896, Theodore Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism, put the case even more starklys on page 10 of The Jewish State: An Attempt at a Modern Solution of the Jewish Question:
"We, the Jews, are a people, one people. The world forgets, in its ignorance and narrowness of heart, that when we sink, we become revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of a revolutionary party; (Bolsheviks?) when we rise, there arises also our terrible power of the purse. (Capitalists?)"
Fancy debating the issue with the most revered secular Jew in Jewish history, Jonathan?

2) 'Pursuing a secret agenda to reshape the world.'

Well, if you accept Churchill's testimony, (and that of any prominent historian who has ever dealt with this subject) I guess you could say what they were doing in Russia and Eastern Europe from 1917 onwards 'reshaped the world' somewhat.

Here's how Rabbi Lewis Browne put it in his 1934 book, How Odd of God:
"We must redeem the Jews and remake the Gentiles. That is what the Communists are trying to do in Russia and, because of their determination and monstrous energy, they may actually effect it."
And if you've never heard of the chap who thought we needed to be remade, the Jewish Encyclopaedia includes him in the copy I have. I doubt that Freedland will ever be able to claim the same notoriety.

In The Culture of Critique Professor Kevin MacDonald quotes Earl Raab, former President of Brandeis University, thus:
"We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible. Just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement of European culture also irreversible."
Do most people know this is the way a good many Jewish movers and shakers are thinking? Are they aware that Jews like Raab have been deliberately pushing for the 'ultimate displacement of European culture' in America for more than fifty years now? No they don't. Thanks to professional name-callers like Freedland, most people, even now, don't have a clue.

In April 1999, just before NATO began bombing Yugoslavia, Wesley Clark, the General in overall command, said this on CNN:
”Let’s not forget what the origin of the problem is. There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a nineteenth-century idea, and we are trying to transition into the twenty-first century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.”
Yep. That's the New World Order all right, destabilise white society the whole world over by filling it up with foreigners. And woe betide those that don't go along.

Clark's father, Benjamin Jacob Kanne, was Jewish.

On 5 May 2003, another Guardian journalist, New Yorker Mike Marqusee, said that Tam’s ‘comment on the alleged Jewish influence on US and British war policy should be seen for what it is… anti-Semitic.’ 

He added:
“There is a warning implied in his remarks, a religious minority is exercising an undue, malign influence on British and US foreign policies. And that influence is exercised on behalf of a foreign country - the state of Israel…
His remarks impute to Jewishness itself a hawkish pro-Israeli bias. The reality, of course, is that political opinion among Jews is diverse… Large numbers of Jews both here and in the US opposed the invasion of Iraq... Among Jews in the US, a sizeable majority vote for the Democrats…
In urging the public to see the Jewish influence at work in the war, Dalyell not only smears Jews, but suggests that the sources of war and empire-building are other than they are.”
I don't think Tam's remarks necessarily 'impute to Jewishness' the pro-Israel bias Marqusee suggests. I think they point the finger at certain Jews, Tony Blair and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs. Nevertheless, his observation about 'large numbers of Jews' opposing the invasion is correct.

However, it's not as correct as he implies. I haven't been able to dig up any 2002/2003 figures for British Jews but a December 2002 - January 2003 poll conducted by the American Jewish Committee's Annual Survey of Jewish Opinion, told us that 59 percent approved of the United States taking military action against Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein from power, whilst only 36 percent were against it.

As for 'a sizeable majority' of US Jews voting 'for the Democrats,' does Marqusee want to believe that Jewish democrats were against the war? Against Bush and the Republican movement, one would have thought, but the war itself? As the 2 February 2003 edition of The Jewish Telegraph Agency bulletin tells us:
"Despite support for Bush’s war on terror, 48 percent of Jews said they’re Democrats."
Only 18 percent of US Jews identified as Republicans at this time.

What these statistics tell me is this: if the Democrats had been in charge of the war that was about to be waged, the percentage of Jews up for it would have appreciably higher.
"In urging the public to see the Jewish influence at work in the war, Dalyell not only smears Jews, but suggests that the sources of war and empire-building are other than they are,” says Marqusee.
Anyway, Freedland says Tam Dalyell's observations are 'poison,' Marqusee describes them as 'smears' and both claim they are anti-Semitic. As did David Aaronovich and a number of others at that time.

Indeed, The Guardian also said:
"A former Labour MP said he would refer the Father of the Commons to the Commission for Racial Equality. Professor Eric Moonman, President of the Zionist Federation, who was a Labour MP from 1966 to 1979, said he was seeking advice on whether there was a case for referral... Jewish figures were furious.”
So, in 'urging the public to see the Jewish influence at work in the war,' Tam would have to be lying, or mistaken at the very least, wouldn't he? That really does seem to be what Moonman and the others were flat out implying.

In parts 2 and 3 of 'The Anti-Semitism Scam' we have already seen what prominent Jews were saying around the time of the Iraq War. Let's revisit the explicit warnings of some of these and see how they stack up against the 'warning implied' in Tam Dalyell's intervention.
"A stronger Israel is very much embedded in the rationale for war with  Iraq. It is a part of the  argument that dare not speak its name, a fantasy quietly cherished by the neo-conservative faction in the Bush Administration and  by many leaders of the American Jewish community. 
The fantasy involves a domino theory. The destruction of Saddam's Iraq will not only remove an enemy of long-standing but will also  change the basic power  equation in the region. It will send a message to Syria and Iran about the perils of support for Islamic terrorists. It will send a message to the Palestinians too: Democratise and make peace on Israeli terms, or forget about a state of your own." (Joe Klein, Time Magazine, 5 February 2003)
"The lack of public discussion about the role of Israel in the  thinking of President Bush is easier to understand, but weird nevertheless. It is the proverbial elephant in the room: Everybody sees it, no one mentions it... Neither supporters nor opponents of a war against Iraq wish to evoke the classic anti-Semitic image of the king's Jewish  advisers whispering poison into his ear and betraying the country to foreign interests." (Michael Kinsley: Slate Magazine - 4 October 2002)
"The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 Neoconservative intellectuals, most  of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history." (Ari Shavit: Haaretz - 5 April 2003)
"In 1996, as Likud Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepared to take  office, eight Jewish neoconservative  leaders sent him a six-page memo outlining an aggressive vision of government. At the top of their list was overthrowing Saddam... 
The neoconservatives sketched out a kind of domino theory in which the governments of Syria and other Arab countries might later fall or be replaced in the wake of Saddam's ouster. They urged Netanyahu to spurn the Oslo peace accords and to stop making concessions to the Palestinians. 
Lead writer of the memo was Perle. Other signatories were Feith, now Undersecretary of Defence, and Wurmser, a senior adviser to John Bolton, Undersecretary of State." (James Rosen: The Sacramento Bee - 6 April 2003)
"If the U.S. gets bogged down with heavy casualties on  both sides, Americans are going to blame big oil and Zionism for getting them into this  mess." (Dr. Henry Makow: his blog - 10 February 2003)
I don't know about you, ladies and gents, but I don't think Tam's warning demonstrates any more 'Jewish influence at work' than the authors above. Indeed, they suggest that the influence is obvious. Irrefutable in fact. It just is. And yet, Moonman would have you believe he deserved to have his collar felt and Marqusee, Freedland and Aaronovich were uniformly contemptuous.

Yet, ALL of them would have known the truth. All would have known that what the American Jews cited above were telling us was correct. Jews were at the heart of the Neoconservative push for war with Iraq.

The bottom line is this: Tam Dalyell was dead set against the invasion of Iraq. The 'Neoconservative intellectuals' ('most of whom were Jewish') were all for it.

In light of what has happened in the region over the course of the last twelve years, who was right?

Who was wrong?

Cynical use of the anti-Semitic trope had Freedland, Aaronovich, Moonman, Marqusee and a good few others nastily condemning the guy who got it right, simply for telling the truth.

In the future, if John Mann and co. get their way and the law is amended to provide the Jew with even more special protection, honest men and women will find it well night impossible to point out any who may be 'exercising an undue, malign influence on British and US foreign policies' if they happen to be Jewish.

On 14 January 2015, David Cameron said this in The Jewish Chronicle:
"Last weekend I joined the march on the streets of Paris surrounded by placards saying: ‘je suis Juif’. In the aftermath of one of the darkest moments in Europe in recent times, people of all ages and backgrounds came together to show solidarity with those who had suffered. In the face of those who tried to suppress our values, the voice of free speech responded ever louder.

The idea that the Jewish people once again feel unsafe in Europe is a truly sickening thought...

We too have seen a completely unacceptable rise in antisemitism. My message to the readers of the Jewish Chronicle is clear... We are going to fight antisemitism with everything we have got. My policy is simple: zero-tolerance. No exceptions and no excuses.

So let me be clear: no disagreements on politics or policy will ever be allowed to justify racism, prejudice or extremism in our society. Over generations we have built something incredible in our country: a multi-ethnic, multi-faith democracy – and we are not going to let anti-Semitism destroy it...

We have invested millions in protecting Jewish schools. And.. the Community Security Trust has an excellent relationship with the police...

We have banned extremist preachers... and we are getting extremist material taken down from the internet. 
Some may argue that this is not compatible with free speech. But I say we would not sit back and allow right-wing extremists or Nazis to recruit support in these ways. So we will not allow Islamist extremists this opportunity either.

Finally, I want us to do more to educate people in our country about fighting prejudice and hatred. That is one of the reasons why I set up the Holocaust Commission which will be reporting on Holocaust Memorial Day later this month. I think it is vital that all our young people understand not just what happened in the Holocaust but also how it happened...

The Commission will ensure the memory and testimony of Holocaust survivors is faithfully preserved for ever – and that the lessons of the Holocaust can be learnt by young people in this country for generations to come.

Defeating the poisonous ideology of extremism will take patience and determination. But I promise you this: together we will beat anti-Semitism."
What is anti-Semitism, Dave?

Once upon a time it might have been defined as a hatred of Jews, nowadays, however, one sceptical school of thought has it that an anti-Semite is anyone the Jews hate. In other words, if the Jew considers you a threat to to his interests you will be smeared as an anti-Semite.

Let's remind ourselves of what Shulamit Aloni had to say about it in part 1.
"It is a trick we always use it. When, from Europe, someone is criticising Israel WE BRING UP THE HOLOCAUST. When, in this country (USA), people are criticising Israel THEN THEY ARE ANTISEMITIC."
Is the anti-Semitism accusation a trick, Dave? When you use it against those who dare to tell truths that Zion's top table 'consider... a threat to their interests' are you really trying to trick the British people into thinking that the honest patriot is really a 'right-wing extremist,' or even a 'Nazi?'

One thing I can say for certain is this, it wasn't anyone on the so-called right-wing of European politics who imported the terrorist threat. It was you, Dave. It was the politician. It was the social engineer entirely at one with Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi's sinister plans.

Coudenhove-Kalergi was the founder, and President for 49 years, of the Pan-European Union, the fore-runner of the European Union. 

In his 1925 book, ‘Praktischer Idealismus,’ he says this:
"The man of the future will be mixed-race... The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future... will replace the diversity of peoples... Russian Bolshevism constitutes a decisive step towards this purpose, where a small group of Communist spiritual aristocrats govern the country… 
From the European quantity-people… the mass, two quality races rise up: blood aristocracy and the Jews… both of them stick to their belief in their higher mission, of their better blood… In both of these… lies the core of the European nobility of the future… 
Modern Jewry surpasses all other peoples in percentage of important men… with Trotsky as the frontrunner of modern politics… The prominent position held by the Jews these days is owed to their spiritual supremacy… Modern anti-Semitism is one of the many reactionary phenomena of the mediocre against the supreme… 
As a people the Jews experience the eternal struggle of quantity against quality, inferior groups against high quality individuals, inferior majorities against superior minorities.”
In his memoirs, Coudenhove-Kalergi says:
"At the beginning of 1924, we received a call from Baron Louis de Rothschild. One of his friends, Max Warburg… had read my book… and wanted to get to know us. To my great surprise, Warburg spontaneously offered us 60,000 gold marks... Max Warburg… had a principle of financing these movements… 
He arranged his 1925 trip to the United States to introduce me to Paul Warburg and financier Bernard Baruch."
The Jewish businessman and banker, Bernard Baruch, was the intimate advisor and confidant of no less than four American presidents.

Max Warburg was the director of the family’s banking house in Hamburg from 1910 until 1938, when he left Germany for America. As head of the firm, he had been an adviser to Kaiser Wilhelm prior to and during World War I.

Paul Warburg, the brother of Felix and Max, was the man most responsible for the creation, in 1913, of the Federal Reserve, the most powerful (and unaccountable) banking system in the world.

On 17 February 1950, addressing the US Senate, Franklin D. Roosevelt’s top financial adviser, James Warburg, said this:
"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent."
James Warburg was Paul Warburg’s son.

On 19 November 2012, the European Council website said this:
“The President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, was awarded the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize... to celebrate 90 years of the Pan-Europa movement. The prize is awarded to leading personalities for their extraordinary commitment in the European unification process… 
The idea, which was also at the centre of Coudenhove-Kalergi's work, has lost nothing of its importance 90 years later.”

The melting pot endeavours of Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi on behalf of ‘Communist spiritual aristocrats’ and the ‘quality races’ of ‘aristocracy and the Jews’ were rewarded when, in 1950, he became the first recipient of the Charlemagne Prize.

Other winners of the prize that bears the first Holy Roman Emperor's name have included Roy Jenkins; Edward Heath; Bill Clinton; Henry Kissinger and Tony Blair.

Of those named in the preceding paragraphs, Trotsky, (Leon Bronstein) chief architect of the Russian Revolution and first head of the Red Army, Louis de Rothschild, Max, Paul and James Warburg, Bernard Baruch and Henry Kissinger were Jewish.

As for Coudenhove-Kalergi, he was, himself, mixed-race. His father was an Austro-Hungarian aristocrat and his mother the daughter of a Japanese oil tycoon.

Two of his three wives were Jewish.

Is my pointing out the tribal origins of the wives of an aristocratic, mixed-race gent who wanted to breed we ‘inferior’ mediocrities out of existence, irrelevant, Dave? More to the point, is it, God forbid, anti-Semitic? How about me blowing the whistle on the Jewish origins of the ultra-powerful, world-changing social engineers cited above? Would that be anti-Semitic, too?

Thing is, Dave, oughtn't we lowly white types whom the mixed-race aristocrat and his various sponsors had in their sights all of ninety years ago be allowed to know every last detail of their provenance? You know, so we can do whatever might be necessary to prevent them deleting us?

I, somehow, doubt that most the descendants of the Count's 'quality races... aristocracy and the Jews' would want the whistle blown. These, I reckon, would be entirely likely to want such illuminating truth censored.

Hey, Dave, remind us of your quality origins again!

I doubt that many will need to be told how effective the multicultural initiative has been in recent times but, for those who have had their head in a dark place over the course of the last ninety years, here's a reminder.

As the joys of diversity reduce our presence on the planet, so too do sexual diseases.

Against the will of the European peoples, the mainstream politician has, at the behest of his global masters, seeded our world with millions of immigrants.

At this was being done, the same politician was making war upon their realtives in their own homelands. Thus, the ruling elite were busily importing those who were almost bound to despise us given the great slaughter that Western intervention has unleashed.

And then there's Palestine. 

What was it you said back in July 2010, Dave? You know, when you were in Turkey sucking up to Erdogan?
"The situation in Gaza has to change. Humanitarian goods and people must flow in both directions. Gaza cannot and must not be allowed to remain a prison camp."
And then, before that, on 28 June 2010, you said this in the House of Commons:
"Everybody knows that we are not going to sort out the problem of the Middle East peace process while there is, effectively, a giant open prison in Gaza."
Hey, Dave, don't get me wrong, when politicians actually tell the truth the rest of us should celebrate, so good for you with the prison camp intervention. Especially when the usual suspects were always going to give you a hard time for doing so.

Are you an anti-Semite, Dave? Of course you're not. You're always buttering up the Sanhedrin, we all know that. I've lost count of the times you've kissed Jew bot since you were in with a shot of the Tory leadership. So it must be galling when they use that old anti-Semitic 'trick' against you of all people. Do you remember when, just after you did your 'prison camp' thing in Turkey, the President of Israel, Shimon Peres, said this:
"In England, there has always been something deeply pro-Arab... and anti-Israeli in the establishment."
At the same time, Israeli MP, Aryeh Eldad announced:
"Both governments from the right and the left prefer Arab interests over Israeli interests... (It) is an ongoing, subtle form of anti-Semitism."
It can't be very nice to have your a*** nipped by right pair of Israeli sheepdogs intent on getting you back in the pen. Especially when you're always showing such loyalty to the cause.

Ah, well, never mind, Dave. That Eldad chap's dad, Israel, was a leading light in the Stern Gang, the nastiest of the terrorist groups that terrorised, not just the local Arabs, but us as well out there in the thirties and forties, so he may not be the nicest guy that ever lived himself.

Funny how times change, isn't it? Back then they were slaughtering over seven hundred of our soldiers and policemen, even Lord Moyne, a big-shot politician, wasn't immune. (Yitzhak Shamir: Why we killed Lord Moyne) Now look at us. When the Jewish sheepdog barks the Western politician is back in the fold as quick as you can say 'Irgun.'

The Irgun was the terrorist organisation from whence the Stern Gang was sprung. Best known for the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in July 1946, they also carried out the Deir Yassin massacre of peaceful Palestinian villagers on 9 April 1948. Eldad's mob also took part in that very forgettable little incident. Oh yes, nowadays not a blue-eyed schoolchild in the West has the least clue about that teeny-weeny little 'Holocaust.'

You know how, when we're talking about 7/7/2005; Charlie Hebdo; the Supermarket killings; the unknown thousands who have gone off to fight for ISIS; hate preachers and 600,000 or so of our little girls being 'groomed,' drugged-up, gang-raped and prostituted by, for the most part, Muslim men, you politicians are always at pains to point out that only a small minority of Muslims are responsible for all the horror? Well, you can't really say the same thing about the Israelis.

You see, in Israel, the vast majority of the electorate tend to vote for people who have done dreadful things. For example, Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzhak Shamir, was, at one time, head of the Stern Gang. In that role, he was personally responsible for plotting the assassination of the aforementioned Lord Moyne, the British Minister for Middle East Affairs.

Prime Minister Menachem Begin was an even bloodier terrorist. Boss of the Irgun from 1944 onwards, he ordered the bombing of Jerusalem's King David Hotel in 1946, which was the administrative HQ of the British military in Palestine at the time.

91 people were killed.

Under Begin’s leadership, the Irgun also kidnapped and hanged two British sergeants.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was the commander of the notorious 'Unit 101' of which organisation Wikipedia tells us this:
"Unit 101 specialized in offensive guerrilla warfare in enemy countries... The unit is held responsible for the widely condemned Qibya massacre in the fall of 1953... 65 to 70 Palestinian civilians, half of them women and children, were killed when Sharon's troops dynamited 45 houses and a school."
Ehud Barak was the top man in the Israeli Defence Forces and head of the Military Intelligence Directorate before becoming Prime Minister and you don't get to such elevated military positions in Israel without having broken heads.

At the non-lethal level, Israeli President Moshe Katsav was jailed for rape and Prime Minster Ehud Olmert was convicted on corruption and bribery charges.

However, that the Israeli electorate are content to vote the odd former terrorist into power is not open to question. Thus, when one is debating the pros and cons of the ongoing slaughter in Gaza, it's not just the opinion polls that clue us in to the majority's indifference to the sufferings of the Palestinians, it's the leaders they vote for.

Vote terrorist, get terror. Simple really.

Anyway, if they vote for it, it can't be legitimately argued that they aren't responsible for it. So when Dave says Gaza is a 'prison camp,' it's not just the leadership imprisoning its inmates and then intermittently slaughtering them, it's the 86% of the Israeli population who support the slaughters as well.

So, Dave, if you can tell the truth about the awfulness of the Palestinians' plight, I should be able to as well, shouldn't I? You know, without you or some Friend-of-Israel zealot accusing me of being an anti-Semite, citing a desire to 'fight anti-Semitism with everything we have got?'

This is why I ask the question, Dave. This is why I want to know what 'anti-Semitism' really is. Is it, for example, whatever powerful politicians like you want it to mean? Might it be what the leaders of the European and World Jewish Congresses mean? Or might it even be what former terrorists like Menchem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir want it to mean?

Who gets to decide, Dave?

In a just world it occurs to me that we ought to be guided by one very simple principle. Is it true? Is the observation that causes some to describe others as an anti-Semite true or not? If it is, then surely those who wish to censor the truth by levelling the 'anti-Semitic' calumny at an honest man are at fault.

Would that it was so. Unfortunately, in the real world, it isn't. In the democracies created by today's European leaders, David Cameron's 'voice of free speech' may resonate when Jews are dying at the hands of militant Islam but it is entirely silent when 'Holocaust' mythology is questioned. Across Europe, honest men and women languish in jail for challenging the six million figure with their diligently researched findings.

Such folk would, I'm sure, be 'anti-Semites' in Dave World. Just as they are in France, Germany, Austria and a host of other on-message European countries where truth comes a long way last to a myth-driven status quo. Thing is, there are lots and lots of Jewish worthies who are entirely happy to condemn their fellows when they behave badly. This raises a very interesting point in the 'what is anti-Semitism' debate that the Daves might find difficult to deal with.

If they take the part of the Jewish establishment when it insists that the aberrant behaviours of Jewish rogues must not be exposed, are they not thereby behaving in an anti-Semitic fashion towards those Jews who would have the guilty condemned and exposed?

The 6,000,000 figure that nowadays must not be challenged has long been known by all manner of historical authority to be a considerable exaggeration. And so we have the absurd situation where, in France, for example, where Dave's 'voice of free speech responded ever louder,' the truth-seeker can be jailed for distributing the results of their research if the holocaust mythology is contravened. This despite there being no specific legislation outlawing denial.

Austria; Belgium; the Czech Republic; Hungary; Luxembourg; Poland and Romania all have specific Holocaust Denial laws. Germany; Liechtenstein; Lithuania; the Netherlands; Portugal and Switzerland all have laws, like France, that can be used to bring those who would revise the six million figure downwards to book.

In all of these countries it would not matter if the renowned historian, Professor Norman Finkelstein, were to appear in court, speaking up for the defendant; likewise the authorities would have little use for the testimony of Gerald Reitlinger who, as early as 1953, was telling us in his book 'The Final Solution,' that Soviet claims 4,000,000 deaths at Auschwitz were 'ridiculous.' He suggested an alternative figure of 800,000 to 900,000 dead.

Until 1990, the Soviet propaganda was maintained at Auschwitz. Here's the memorial stone that greeted greeted the visitor between 1948 and that date:

Nowadays, the figure of 1.1m Auschwitz dead, (960,000 Jews) is the the one most often proffered by the authorities. Why then, when the establishment declares that 2.9 million people who were previously thought dead at Auschwitz were, in fact, not dead at all, were 2.9 million newly undead not deducted from the overall six million statistic?

Ask Dave and the parliamentary 'Friends of Israel.'

Throughout the rest of the concentration camp system the death totals have been coming down consistently. When Majdanek was liberated in July 1944, the Soviets said that 1.7 million people had been murdered there. By the time the Nuremberg Trials began in November 1945, they had revised this figure down to 1.5 million. In 1948, the Main Commission for the Investigation of Nazi Crimes in Poland were saying that 360,000 had died and, as late as 1998, the Madjanek Museum guidebook was saying more than 234,000 had died.

In December 2005, however, the same Museum announced that Tomasz Kranz had established that 78,000 people had lost their lives at Majdanek.

On p. 288 of the 1963 edition (vol. 18) of the Encyclopaedia Britiannica, this is said:
"At Mathausen, one of the extermination camps in Austria, close to 2,000,000 people, mostly Jews, were exterminated between 1941 and 1945."
The U.S. Holocaust museum now says:
"At least 95,000 died there. More than 14,000 were Jewish."
Dachau used to have a sign up that said 240,000 Jews died there, gassed in 'ovens' by the Nazis. Nowadays, a new sign states that 19,000 people of all races died there, mainly of typhus and starvation. Nowhere does it say that anyone ever died in an 'oven.'

Using the latest figures from the cited camps alone, the overall total of 6,000,000 dead would have to be reduced to a figure of 462,000, many of whom would not have been Jewish. Many of whom would not have died violently.

The international Red Cross document above, dated 11 July 1979, was presented at one of the trials of ‘holocaust denier’ Ernst Zündel. The death statistics cited here read: Auschwitz - 52.389; Bergen-Belsen - 6.507; Buchenwald - 20.501; Dachau - 17.842; Flossenburg - 18.259; Gross Rosen - 7.925; Neuengamme - 5.570; Mauthausen - 77.727; Majdanek - 6.920; Mittelbau - 7.187; Matseller - 3.944; Sachsenhausen - 4.785; Abteilung 1 - 41.748. 

TOTAL: 271.504.

Even without Sobibor and Treblinka, we seem to be missing a lot of dead people, don’t we? 

The above evidence didn't help Mr Zundel. Despite having lived in Canada for more than 40 years, the top brass said he was a threat to Canada's national security and imprisoned him whilst his departure back to Germany was being processed (fixed). 

He was deported in March 2005 and, upon arrival, immediately re-arrested. He was detained in Mannheim prison on fourteen charges of inciting racial hatred.

In February 2007, Zündel, who was by that time 68 years old, was sentenced to five years in prison.

He was released in March 2010, having spent the previous seven years in custody for citing factual statistics that no one at any of his trials made any attempt to disprove. That's what the 'Holocaust' industry can do to you if you attempt to mess with the legend.

That's what the Western politician is prepared to cuddle up to if his Jewish masters demand it.

Anyway, throughout Europe 'Holocaust Denial' is a very hot potato indeed and, even here, you can be slandered, defamed, threatened and prosecuted for publishing information such as that seen above.

Even though it's true.

I wonder, in a world where the anti-Semitism professional held sway, would they dare to prosecute the contrary Jewish worthy for not learning 'the lessons of the Holocaust?'

Let's take another look at what Jewish historian, Professor Norman Finkelstein, says in his year 2000 history, 'The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering:'

"The Holocaust has proven to be an indispensable ideological weapon. Through its deployment, one of the world's most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, has cast itself as a 'victim' state, and the most successful ethnic group in the United States has likewise acquired victim status.
Considerable benefits accrue to this specious victimhood - in particular, immunity to criticism, however justified."
"Both my father and my mother were survivors of the Warsaw ghetto and the Nazi concentration camps... One of my father's lifelong friends was a former inmate with him in Auschwitz, a seemingly incorruptible left-wing idealist who on principle refused German compensation after the war.  
Eventually he became a director of the Israeli Holocaust museum, Yad Vashem. Reluctantly and with genuine disappointment, my father finally admitted that even this man had been corrupted by the Holocaust industry, tailoring his beliefs for power and profit."
"The Holocaust proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel." 
"The field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense, if not sheer fraud." 
"Given the nonsense that is turned out daily by the Holocaust industry, the wonder is that there are so few skeptics." 
Now, despite the fact that he's a Jew and both his parents are 'Holocaust survivors,' Professor Finkelstein has been attacked remorselessly by the usual suspects since the release of his year 2000 history, to the point where, following a public spat with the Zionist lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, he was forced to resign from his position at De Paul University in Chicago.

So, if those before whom our own politicians doff the cap are happy to belittle and degrade the learned Prof, I guess they wouldn't feel too uncomfortable dismissing his character and observations.

However, neither they nor their masters could dismiss Professor Raul Hilberg similarly. Professor Hilberg is the acknowledged eminence grise of Holocaust history and, if you dare to take issue with him in this area you would, undoubtedly, come a cropper.

On 9 May 2007, Professor Hilberg said this on Amy Goodman's show, 'Democracy Now:'

"Finkelstein was the first to publish what was happening in his book, 'The Holocaust Industry.' And when I was asked to endorse the book, I did so... Finkelstein was being attacked over and over... His style is a little different from mine but I was saying the same thing, and I had published my results in that three-volume work, published in 2003... and I did not hear from anybody a critical word about what I said, even though it was the same substantive conclusion that Finkelstein had offered…

Finkelstein, when he published this book, was alone. It takes an enormous amount of academic courage to speak the truth when no one else is out there to support him. And so, I think that given this acuity of vision and analytical power, demonstrating that the Swiss banks did not owe the money...

Those who in the end are proven right triumph and he will be among those who will have triumphed, albeit, it so seems, at great cost.”

Amy Goodman's conversation with Professor Hilberg (and Professor Avi Shlaim) may be heard in the video below, from 27 minutes in.

On 12 August 1998, the Swiss banking system capitulated to the extortionate campaign levelled at them by the World Jewish Congress and agreed to a ‘global settlement’ of $1.25 billion dollars. Professor Hilberg was incensed. On 28 January 1999, he said this in the Swiss weekly, Weltwoche:
"The Jews have used a weapon that can only be described as blackmail… The banks have paid more than they actually owe. The demands of the World Jewish Congress are therefore morally false… There is… no relationship whatsoever between what the banks owe the Jews and what the World Jewish Congress has demanded and received… 
I cannot stress enough that the man who heads the World Jewish Congress (Edgar M. Bronfman) does not speak for me. His family has one and half billion dollars. If he really wanted to, he could help a few poor survivors with money from his own vest pocket."
If the UK's anti-Semitism scam die-hards want to create new law in order to make it more difficult for the Jihadi to terrorise the rest of us, I advise them to go right ahead. 

Though I would suggest it would be a whole lot more efficient just to boot out the hate-preachers and their followers and to make sure they, and those who think like them, are never able to get back in again.

However, if they wish to smuggle through truth-censoring legislation on the back of it, they had better be prepared for one hell of a fight. The world is sick to death of the fawning partiality shown by western politicians to this aggressively self-serving bunch. They were elected to serve the wants and needs of the majority, not those of a perpetually dissatisfied minority with a dark and dangerous history.

Take heed all of you who imagine that the onward slither up the greasy careerist pole will be better served by acceding to every last whim of the Elders. Business as usual is not an option.

You lie, I do not. They lie, I do not.

And so you really ought to trust me when I say something as categoric as this:

It isn't just me watching you now.

The 2015 articles cited below are all from mainstream media sources.

My own comments are bracketed. One wonders how many of these (articles as well as the comments) would fall foul of any new law intended to obscure Jewish wrongdoing.

USA: Jewish groups get 94% of Homeland Security grants! (Jewish 2% = wealthiest in USA!)
How Billionaire Adelson (Jew) dominates Chinese gambling and U.S. politics
Casino king Sheldon Adelson spent $100 million trying to put Republican in White House
Anger (Jewish) simmers as EU parliament shoots down anti-Semitism task force
Upper Nazareth mayor (Jew): No Arab school here long as I'm in charge
Top (Jewish) lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, denies sex charges
Alan Dershowitz sued in Prince Andrew sex abuse case
Rich, old Whites get better news than poorer, younger non-Whites says BBC News Chief (Jew)
How patronising! BBC boss Alan Yentob (Jew) says: We DO make shows for working-classes
Christianity is 'waste material excreted from the body of the Jewish people?'
52 percent of Israeli Jews say African migrants are ‘a cancer!’
Why ARE the rich and powerful so in thrall to Ghislaine Maxwell (Jew)?
Picked to sleep with Prince Andrew by Maxwell's daughter and Jeffrey Epstein (Jew)
Girls silenced by Andrew's friend the sex abuser (Jew)
Fraudster (Jew) gets 8 years in $57M Holocaust scam!
Kim Dotcom: "Hollywood is run by mostly Jewish entrepreneurs!"
5,000 police officers deployed to protect France's Jewish schools! (And Christian schools?)
Jewish patrol cars out in force in London! (Can we have some too?)
Sheldon Silver's fall signals end of Jewish era in New York politics
"The idea Jews feel unsafe is sickening!" (We also feel unsafe, Dave. Is that sickening too?)
"Director Roman Polanski (Jew) questioned... over 1977 child rape"
Director Roman Polanski asks judge to ban media from 1977 child sex case
"Establishment child abuse... Sir Leon (Jew) should have faced questions!"
George Soros (Jew) and Bernard Henri-Levy (Jew): The world must aid Ukraine
Soros creates New World Order but rich still buying hiding places just in case
Prostitute testifies against "brutal" Dominique Strauss-Kahn (Jew)
£800m tycoon (Jew) and his very tiny tax bill
Top judge (Jew) on free speech: We mustn't 'exercise it regardless of rights of others!'
Red Ed (Jew) the tax avoider
Miliband is a card-carrying Marxist unfit to govern says Sir John Ritblat (Jew)
Miliband says Twitter/Facebook must fight rhetoric aimed at Jews/Muslims (And Christians?)
French PM accused of being under Jewish influence because his wife is a Jew
Babies stricken with herpes after ultra-orthodox Jewish blood sucking circumcision
"I (Jew) am gay. And I want my kid to be gay too!"
Ex-ministers Straw (part-Jew) and Rifkind (Jew) brag to business about political contacts
£67,000 isn't enough for standard of living I'm entitled to says Malcolm Rifkind
Is this man the most powerful Jew in the world?
Is marrying Jewish becoming a requirement for Gentile political families?
Kremlin sees a "disproportionate representation of Jews" as traitors
Top French Jew "calls on Americans to combat online hate speech!"
Farrakhan: ‘Lying, murderous Zionist Jews’ behind 9/11
'I killed them': Jewish property tycoon Robert Durst arrested
Anti-Semitism like a disease says Michael Douglas (Jewish misbehaviour critics are diseased?)
Cameron gives £3m for Jewish security (Anything for our security?)
Jewish Oligarch spends millions on militia to hold onto Ukrainian province
Leo Abse (dead Jewish MP) 'investigated by police in connection with child abuse'
"Jewish organiser of anti-UKIP demo... said his Jewish roots were his motivation!"
Lena Dunham faces criticism over article comparing Jewish men to dogs 
Right-wing Ukrainian leader is Jewish and proud of it
USA: Jewish groups get 94% of Homeland Security grants! (Jews = 2% of America)
Israel blackmailed Bill with Monica tapes!
The ex-Israeli solider who led a Kiev fighting unit
Palestinians ask Kerry (father Jewish) to stop treating Israel as if it were 'above the law'
America’s left-wing Jews are ashamed of Israel’s Jews
Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert found guilty of corruption
NETANYAHU: Iran nuclear deal threatens Israel's existence! (Zionism threatens all of us)

'Nazis targeted Jews because they were... prominent in the prestigious professions'
Republicans more fervently pro-Israel than ever (Bought/owned by wealthy donors)

April 2015 information from other than the mainstream media:

Tories want a multi-billionaire Jewish Yank (3-time New York Mayor) to be Mayor of London?
Total control of the United States - The Israeli/Jewish lobby
Solzhenitsyn: the incredible disappearing man
Dr David Duke and Jewish Supremacism
Prepare for a Jewish police state!
Mass Immigration, its causes and the Jewish Question
USA: Jews arrested over organ trafficking case
United Nations calls Israel world’s worst violator of women’s rights!

A few links:

A History of anti-Semitism (to 1900)
The Protocols of Zion
Jews DO control the media
The Israel lobby
The Runnymede Trust and Race Law
Their embrace of open borders
Who stole our culture?
The Community Security Trust
Spies and Bombs
Secrets and Lies
The Holocaust?
Holocaust by hunger
Jewish Gangsters
Louise Ellman and the Slave Trade
The 50billion dollar fraudster
Did privatisation increase the Russian death rate?
Dostoyevsky: observations and prophecy
Russian tycoon had RBS loan of £2.5bn written off!
Boris Berezovsky
Edward Bernays
Amery's little secret


No comments:

Post a Comment