Tuesday, 25 February 2014

The media routinely covers up black-on-white violence

On 3 November 2013, Colin Flaherty said this at World Net Daily News:
"When a mom and daughter were kidnapped, forced to withdraw money from an ATM, raped, then shot last week, (video at link) the Indianapolis Star played it by the book: Do not mention the suspects are black.

The 'book' in this case is written by the Society of Professional Journalists, headquartered just three miles from the scene of the crime. In last month’s issue of the SPJ magazine, the oldest and largest organization of journalists in America reminded its members how they should report racial violence.


The SPJ story was just repeating what dozens of chapters around the country tell its members in regular seminars: Unless someone is considerate enough to wave around a sign saying, 'Kill Honky,' or issue a press release or utter racial expletives in front of lots of witnesses, the fact that the suspects just happen to be black has no bearing on the story.

And if you wonder about it, you are probably a 'racist and hater,' said the SPJ.

Never mind that when Indianapolis police dispatchers take a 911 call, one of the first questions they ask is about race. Never mind when these same dispatchers talk to patrolmen on publicly accessible scanners, one of the first pieces of information they broadcast is the race of the suspects. Never mind that Indianapolis is the scene of dozens of recent examples of black mob violence, though you would not know it from reading the Indianapolis Star.

Many of these episodes are centered downtown, near the gleaming but increasingly empty Circle Mall. Many are connected to the Indiana Black Expo held every summer. And when police flood the zone to prevent more black mob violence downtown, with helicopters and horses and SWAT teams, the rowdy sometimes take a bus to a local mall and create violence and mayhem there.

Many of these episodes of black mob violence are on video. Many are documented in 'White Girl Bleed a Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to America and How the Media Ignore It,' which has an entire chapter on Indianapolis.

To be fair, Indianapolis is not remarkably different from Kansas City, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, Philadelphia, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Greensboro, Rochester, Richmond, Miami Beach, Fresno, Louisville, Memphis, Greensboro and more than 100 other centers of regular and intense black mob violence: The papers in those towns are loathe to report it as well. They say they are color blind.

These are the same papers that every day run stories about black caucuses, black churches, black colleges, black TV stations, black expos, black radio, black newspapers, black blogs and on and on.

But black mob violence? Not a thing.

People in Indianapolis are wondering why: they question why the paper is so heavily invested in refusing to let their readers know that black mob violence exists exponentially out of proportion in their town.

Daniel Lee is just one of dozens who left comments at the IndyStar.com and other web sites:

'The Star won’t publish the suspects’ race unless it’s part of a ‘detailed’ description including clothes, hairstyle, Italian or German-style boots, hoop or stud earrings, buttons, snaps or hook-and-eye fasteners, plaid or paisley, earth-tones or vibrant joyful colors, full description of every visible tattoo, etc,' Lee quipped. 'It’s their way of avoiding what they consider the racism of calling black suspects ‘black'.'

Johnny West piled on: 'It is completely irresponsible for the Star to not have a description of the suspects included in this story. This story is useless to the community without a timely description. If police did not release a description, that should be noted in the story.'

David Hogan noticed a pattern: 'I do not understand why the Indy Star will not release a description of the suspects. According to IMPD, 4-5 black male suspects, one of which who was wearing a grey hooded sweatshirt, were involved.

'I got this from the Channel 8 news site. Bill McClerry is the reporter on this story,' Hogan continued.

'Hey, Bill, if you are reading these comments, can you please explain why the Indy Star does not release a physical description other than maybe height and age of the possible suspects? I think it would be helpful to get a reason behind this critical omission of facts surrounding this and other stories the paper has reported in the past.'

On and on it went until Alvie Lindsay, the 'News and Investigations Director' at the Star stepped in to explain it all.

'Lots of questions here about descriptions of suspects,' Lindsay responded. 'We are working to update the story. If and when we have a detailed description of the suspects – and not merely race and gender, but something that could reasonably help the public identify individuals, that information will be included.

Bill, our reporter, just talked to the IMPD spokesman who said there are no other such details at this point... It’s actually not clear... how many suspects were involved. No age range has been provided, either.'

After reading the story, several commentators mistakenly came to believe that these details were not available. Or that the victims were not aware of the racial identity of the suspects...

The Indy Star may refuse to report on racial violence, but lots of people know about it anyway. Abdul Hakim-Shabazz is an Indianapolis attorney and community activist who has heard it all before. Writing in Indiana Barrister, Hakim Shabazz says it is time to take off the blinders and confront the racial roots of the violence and lawlessness in Indianapolis.

'Indianapolis, you have a problem. Your problem is young, black men who are out of control... It’s time to step up and start making examples out of people,' Hakim-Shabazz writes. 'Decent citizens, black and white, should not have to live in fear of urban terrorists'...

Black mobs routinely terrorize cities across the country, but the media and government are silent."
As I keep saying, ladies and gentlemen, the powers-that-be, those we foolishly vote for, even now, after all they've done, are at war with us. 

Where they should have advised, they censored the needful information. Where they should have prohibited, they invited. Where they should have protected, they abandoned.

In our country, the self-same thing that Colin Flaherty describes above has been happening since the nineteen-fifties. Immigrants have ALWAYS been far more lawless than us. But, instead of warning us of the dangers, instead of keeping them out of our world, those we elected to serve our best interests did precisely the opposite. They shipped in the immigrant and, once here, promoted and pandered to him, knowing how his criminality would affect our safe, secure and societal world.

There will be a civil war in this country. It will come. It's unavoidable. When it does, those who have been at war with us all along will use the opportunity provided, not just to be rid of the man who dares to stand up against them and the horror they inflict, but those who hide under the bedclothes as well.

They are at war with all of us. Not just those they cynically describe as 'racist, Fascist, Nazi bigots.'

All of us. They want us gone.

As Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, the founder of the Pan-European Union (the forerunner of the EU) said back in 1925:
"The man of the future will be mixed-race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear... The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future... will replace the diversity of peoples."
That's what they're after, ladies and gents. That's what they've always been after. Breed the one race that could prove troublesome out of existence and what's left will be much easier to control.

The Count also said this:
"Russian Bolshevism constitutes a decisive step towards this purpose where a small group of Communist spiritual aristocrats govern the country... The general staff of both parties is recruited from Europe's spiritual leader race, the Jews.

From the European quantity-people… the mass, two quality races rise up: blood aristocracy and Jewry… both of them stick to their belief in their higher mission, of their better blood… In both of these heterogenic merited races lies the core of the European nobility of the future… The superiority of their spirit predestines them to become a main factor of the future nobility."
Pretty bloody awful, don't you think? Well, this man you've never heard of is worshipped in the corridors of global power. His ideas lie behind those who run the EU, the UN and most of the governments of the western world. Look him up. Check out what they've been keeping from you all this time. if you do, you might just end up fighting on the right side when the balloon goes up.

Oh yes, if you want your world back, you'd better get checking the actuality real soon.

War doesn't wait on the inattentive and the wilfully blind.

Such are invariably the first to go.

Check out the Rogues' Gallery and the interracial homicide statistics for proof of how bad it is here.

No comments:

Post a Comment