“The CIA wanted to assassinate Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi and his co-accused, Al-Amin Khalifa Fhimah, before their trial, a former Washington lobbyist has claimed. William C. Chasey, 73, made the sensational allegation in his autobiography, Truth Never Dies…
He claims agents tried to convince him to plant homing devices on Megrahi and Fhimah as part of the plot…
Mr Chasey, president of the Foundation for Corporate Social Responsibility, a non-governmental organisation, became involved with Libya and the Lockerbie investigation when he was a lobbyist in Washington.”
“On behalf of business clients, I went on a lobbying mission in 1992 with a US congressman in a bid to stabilise relations between the US and Gaddafi’s hated regime… Myself and the congressman and his wife then met Gaddafi and heard his pleas for help within Washington to get sanctions lifted, and heard his claims that Libya was not involved in Lockerbie…
He spoke of the death of his daughter in a US air attack on his home and appealed directly to the congressman’s wife, as a mother, to get her husband to use his influence.”
The article continued:
“Mr Chasey claims this clandestine meeting raised suspicions at the FBI, which launched a lengthy investigation into him. Then, in 1995, he wrote a controversial book, Foreign Agent 4221: The Lockerbie Cover-Up, which claimed Libya was not responsible for the bombing.”William added:
“The FBI investigation, along with a probe by the US tax service, damaged my business and put incredible pressure on my wife, Virginia, and our young daughter Katie… I was hit with 21 felony charges over crimes including wire fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, tax evasion, even larceny and forgery over allegations I stole headed notepaper from congressional offices.”The article then tells us that all but one of the charges against him were dropped when he agreed to admit to a charge of filing a false tax return. He was contacted by the CIA at this point. William added:
“An agent approached me and asked if I could meet again with Megrahi and Fhimah to pinpoint their location so the CIA could assassinate them. In return, the charge would be dropped and my record expunged… He wasn’t explicit but my belief is that the CIA wanted the suspects eliminated to stop any trial taking place and bury the alternative view that Iran and Syria were behind Lockerbie***… (Check out the article ‘ ‘How UK Government hid secret Lockerbie report’)I was sent to Allenwood Federal Prison in Pennsylvania and was amazed when I was joined in the canteen one day by the same CIA agent and one of his colleagues, dressed as inmates.
They offered to free me and clear my record but I said I would not take part in their plot to put electronic homing devices in the suspects’ residences so they could be targeted. I told them, ‘With all of your vast resources, the one thing you will never be able to destroy is my character’…
Apart from my wife, no-one has known about this until now. I love my country but I fear my government.”
“I think Bill Chasey is telling the truth about the CIA. He is a respected philanthropist and was a leading lobbyist in Washington, so he’s not a crank.”However, Buck Revell, who oversaw the FBI’s Lockerbie investigation until 1991, described William’s claims as ‘nonsense.’
I guess he would say that, wouldn’t he?
Here's what she said:
"I was involved in the Lockerbie negotiations... My CIA handler was in Lebanon during the hostage crisis in the 1980s and he was on the ground when Lockerbie was planned, the bombing of Pan-Am 103 was planned...
The CIA had infiltrated heroin trafficking out of the Bekaa Valley and they were taking a profit, a cut of the profits, big time cuts, making millions and millions of dollars, personally profiteering as well financing the black ops.
And so The Defence Intelligence Agency team accused the CIA of having a rogue agent who was double crossing them. Every time they'd close in on the hostages the double agent was, allegedly, reporting it to the Hezbollah, the Islamic Jihad, and so the hostages would be moved.
So, the Defence Intelligence Agency called out an investigation from Washington. And those guys came out and they got heroin, they got money, they got documentation, they were all flying back to Washington on Pan-Am 103 the morning that it crashed, when it blew up out of the sky. And when they died, when all those people died, it killed off all knowledge of the heroin trafficking out of the Bekaa as well. And the CIA's role in heroin."
Incidentally, Ms Lindauer also tells us this:
"I look at Syria as a proxy war because Syria has a long history with Iran and they are Shi'ite. And America's allies in the middle east are Sunnis.
The Saudis, particularly, are radical Salaafists, they believe in Shariyr, they're very deeply conservative and fundamentalist. They are not moderate, they are not pro-democracy. And yet, across the board you see the United States supporting Qatar and Saudi Arabian sponsored, financially sponsored revolutions in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya. All of these are backed by the CIA. And the CIA is supporting the Arab Spring and we're providing guns, financing, we're training them them in propaganda.
And that's very important, the CIA is behind the pro-war propaganda supporting the Arab Spring."
As far back as 1898, The USA was manufacturing ‘false flag’ incidents in order bring about a desired result. An explosion aboard the USS Maine killed 266 men. As a result, the US declared war on Spain and ended up with Cuba.
As regards the USA’s entry into WWII, if you want to know the stuff they don’t teach you in school, check out, ’The Final Secret of Pearl Harbor.’
You might also wish to take a look at: The Tonkin Gulf War Pretext Incidents: When the US Wants to Start a War, it Lies and History of American False Flag Operations.
At one point in the Susan Lindauer interview, this true heroin of our times also says this:
"No good deed goes unpunished in Washington. You can count on it."Anyone who reads this really ought to consider it their duty to investigate these matters further. Unfortunately, most people nowadays would rather live the comfortable lie they're used to than have to deal with an uncomfortable truth they're not. Those who deliberately induced this moral deficiency so that, when the time came, they could make war upon the world whenever they wished, are the enemies of all of us, not just the Saddams and the Shi-ites.
Anyone out there want to quibble with my definition of 'deliberately induced?' What do you think drugging-up, dumbing-down, 'Big Brother,' X-Factor,' 'Eastenders' and 'The Jeremy Kyle Show' are for? When we care more for the next fix than our own children; when the drugs in the water supply render many of us docile, submissive and possibly cancerous; when our educational system (along with the drugs) renders us too stupid to figure out what's really happening and too lazy to do anything about if we do; when we're perpetually distracted by the 'circuses' bit of Juvenal's 'bread and circuses' (the Roman poet was bemoaning this elite v common man tactic as far back as first century A.D.), the powers-that-be really can con us into a suicidal acceptance of whatever it is they want us to accept.
*** In these Stormfront observations I say:
“A document sent to the Father of the House of Commons, Tam Dalyell, in March 2005, also contained the same information.”I sent the document to Mr Dalyell in March 2003, a week after the invasion of Iraq. I entered the ‘2005’ date in error.