“OUR MORAL BANKRUPTCY IS TONY BLAIR'S LASTING LEGACY. All the pillars of the Establishment – the press, the police, the politicians – have toppled like oversized dominos. Greece may be just about bankrupt. MORALLY, I’D SAY THE UK ISN’T FAR BEHIND…Excellently well said, Mr Horowitz. Much is, indeed, 'rotten' in the State. 'Who is going to sort out this mess?' Not the media, that's for sure. Not even those who write the occasional excellent article. You see, the media is bought and paid for. Even those who write excellent articles are, at some level, owned. There are truths that I'm sure you would not tell, Mr Horowitz, despite the fine moral sense implied by your article.
How have we reached this bottom-of-the-barrel mentality, where Sir Paul Stephenson, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, can boast that his ‘integrity is intact’ despite having accepted £12,000 of free hospitality at a health spa? Where Rebekah Brooks can say she is ‘shocked and appalled‘, but take weeks to resign? And how could anyone have actually lived with themselves, after hacking into the messages of a murdered schoolgirl?…
Who is going to sort out this mess? We have precious little hope when the chairman of the Home Affairs Committee, enjoying his moment in the limelight, is KEITH VAZ, who knows a thing or two about scandal, having OBSTRUCTED AN INQUIRY INTO HIS CONNECTIONS TO THE BILLIONAIRE HINDUJA BROTHERS, AND LATER CLAIMED £75,500 FOR A FLAT 12 MILES FROM HIS HOME.
IT ALL STARTED, OF COURSE, WITH TONY BLAIR. He wasn’t the first prime minister to kowtow to Murdoch, but in so many ways he set the trend for what is happening now. Bernie Ecclestone. The BAE bribery inquiry dropped for national security reasons. Dodgy flats in Bristol. Free holidays with millionaire pop stars. We don’t need to rehearse all these stories, because they’ve seeped into the national consciousness.
And next to Blair there was Alastair Campbell, a man as unsuited for public office in his own way as Andy Coulson was in his. Why shouldn’t Cameron follow Blair’s example and employ AN EX-TABLOID JOURNALIST WITH A FOUL MOUTH AND A REPUTATION FOR BULLYING? After all, it wasn’t going to lead to war.
With Blair… MORAL AMBIGUITY BECAME THE ORDER OF THE DAY – and if our political leaders could get away with it, so could everyone else. THE RICH AND THE POWERFUL WERE NOT ONLY IMMUNE FROM THE LAW. THEY WERE, VIA SUPER-INJUNCTIONS, PROTECTED BY IT. Public inquiries into perceived wrongdoing came to conclusions that seemed to bear little relation to the evidence.
Another knight, SIR IAN BLAIR, PRESIDED OVER THE KILLING OF AN UNARMED BRAZILIAN PLUMBER AND THE DISINFORMATION THAT FOLLOWED… Stephen Byers, before his post-government career as ‘a cab for hire‘, APPROVED THE SALE OF A NATIONAL NEWSPAPER TO A PURVEYOR OF PORNOGRAPHY. PETER MANDELSON AND DAVID BLUNKETT WERE BOTH FIRED, TWICE. And then there was Jacqui Smith…
THE NEW LABOUR YEARS CREATED AN ATMOSPHERE OF SHAMELESSNESS – AND NOW WE’RE LIVING WITH THE RESULTS. Footballers are almost expected to cheat and take drugs; stars all sleep three-in-a-bed with prostitutes. Even the royal family, in the portly shape of Prince Andrew, can be photographed cavorting with known sex offenders…
One step leads to another, and whoever took the step from pampered celebrity to murdered schoolgirl surely didn’t even distinguish between the two…
WHATEVER IS ROTTEN IN BRITAIN WAS ROTTEN A LONG TIME AGO. AFTER BLAIR, WE WERE NO LONGER ABLE TO TRUST THOSE WHO RUN THE COUNTRY. GOD HELP US IF WE CAN NO LONGER TRUST THOSE WHO HOLD THEM TO ACCOUNT.”
There are truths which you know to be true which, if the general public were allowed to know them, would worry you. For example, you will know that Rupert Murdoch has, for three decades, been the media's most powerful Zionist. He is utterly committed to Israel. Within his mighty media empire, only one local paper was allowed to speak out in a small way against the war in Iraq. Would you be happy if such information became generally known? Perhaps. But would you applaud the journalist who blew the whistle on the Neocons who were pushing for a second war with Iraq ever since the first once ended in 1991? Most of them were Jewish, you see. Which is something Rupert Murdoch and the politicians he owns are never going to tell the public.
Telling tales on those who are supposed to be off-limits is very important in respect of the 'who-is-going-to-sort-out-this-mess' conundrum. So often, you see, it is just such untouchable folk who create 'the horror' and "the tragedy" in the first place. So, Mr Horowitz, would you speak out in every instance if it helped dispel the 'atmosphere of shamelessness?'
Some do, you know. Some will condemn their fellow Jews when they behave in an asocietal way. People like the historian, Norman Finkelstein, who dares to rubbish the accepted 'Holocaust' statistics; Gilead Altmon, Nathanael Kapner and Henry Makow, all of whom speak out forcibly against all manner of Jewish depredation. And then there's Ari Shavit, the reporter, who, three weeks after the second war in Iraq began, said this in the Israeli daily, Haaretz:
"The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, MOST OF THEM JEWISH, WHO ARE PUSHING PRESIDENT BUSH TO CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY."Now would you, a Jewish gentleman, advocate the telling of such a tale? In order to help eradicate the 'bottom-of-the-barrel mentality' that you, yourself, rail against here? You see, those who routinely pay attention will have known long ago that the Neocons were the prime movers behind the war in Iraq. But very few will have delved deeply enough to discover that 'most of them' were Jewish.
One last whistle I invite you to blow, Mr Horowitz. I have already mentioned that Rupert Murdoch is the world's leading media Zionist. Two separate inquiries have been set up to inquire into his media empire. On 13 July 2011, it was announced that Lord Leveson would lead the public inquiry into the phone hacking scandal, despite his having attended two parties in the previous twelve months at the home of Matthew Freud, the husband of Rupert Murdoch's daughter. Both Leveson and Freud are Jewish.
On 18 July 2011, The Jewish Chronicle informed us thus:
"Lord Grabiner has been appointed to chair News International's Management and Standards Committee. The Jewish QC, 66, will oversee the investigations into behaviour at News International companies.... Lord Grabiner and the committee will report to the directors of the News Corp board. Director Joel Klein said he was pleased 'such an eminent person' had agreed to lead the committee."The News Corp director so pleased by Grabiner's appointment is also Jewish.
Two Jews in charge of the official enquiries into the criminal behaviours of the operatives of the world's leading media Zionist. And those his power and influence have corrupted.
Jews comprise 1-in-200 of the British population. Looked at from a purely mathematical viewpoint, the chances of two Jewish chaps ending up heading both of these enquiries is 40,000-to-1. Thus, the Jew would appear to have 40,000 times more influence than he ought to have regarding the processing of these reports and the conclusions they ultimately draw. That's what my mathematics tell me.
What do you think, Mr Horowitz? Is this just a coincidence? Is it a fluke? Does it not matter? Or would you consider that such Zionism-friendly 40,000-to-1 flukes might equate in any way to the 'atmosphere of shamelessness' of which you spoke?
P.S. The fact that two Jews should end up as the only cabdidates in with a shout of winning the recent Labourship contest is also a 40,000-to-1 shot. That the Milibands are brothers, second-egeneration immigrants and twerpishly unrepresentative of the British working man, would not reduce these odds.
P.P.S. According to Wikipedia:
"Horowitz's father acted as a 'fixer' for prime minister Harold Wilson."