"I'm a Zionist and oppose boycotts of Israel... I take antisemitism very seriously. Any kind of delegitimisation of Israel is something we should call out for what it is and not tolerate it.On 28 February 2013, The Guardian quoted Sava Reuben an Ethiopian Jew living in Israel, thus:
I think the boycotts of Israel are totally wrong. We should have no tolerance for boycotts. I would say that to any trade union leaders.”
"Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It's supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich...Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem's Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections and added:
It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry."
"This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia's interests to treat women preparing to leave the country.On 24 February 2013,Gideon Levy wrote the following in the Israeli daily, Haaretz:
Something is definitely wrong here."
"My Palestinian brothers... we've already told you we no longer care what happens to you... Right and left, they all told you loud and clear... How much longer are you going to keep bothering us with your little problems? How much longer are you going to keep bothering the world?On 16 October 2011, after US Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner, told the G20 finance ministers' 15 October summit in Paris that only a massive firewall would protect the eurozone from a Greek default, The Observer quoted Geithner thus:
Can't you see that U.S. President Barack Obama is coming on another emotional-blackmail visit, to prostrate himself on the graves of Yitzhak Rabin and Theodor Herzl and at Yad Vashem...
Be happy with what you have... The Jewish lobby - yes, it's Jewish - might lose some of its strength... Rotten tyrannies like the Israeli occupation have never lasted forever. So sit tight, my brothers, and wait... If it doesn't happen in your lifetime, perhaps it will in your grandchildren's.
True, you have suffered enough... you have tried everything... Nothing much came out of it all. The settlers have tripled, the Knesset is full of their representatives, and Israel has completely stopped dealing with you. True, if you sit tight you will be forgotten; if you protest, they will say you are terrorists. But the most important thing is: not now. Not when Israel is busy, not when Israel has had it with you...
It's hard to be a Palestinian but, remember, it's even harder to be a Jew.
A Jew, after all, is always the victim; the only victim around."
“THERE ARE SIX DAYS TO SAVE THE WORLD.”Which, as it turns out, wasn't entirley accurate. Geithner is Jewish.
Apart from him, a peek at who, precisely, controls Obama’s Treasury Department is instructive. Remember, these are the people who have gotten to grips with the world’s financial crisis to such an extent that the chief among them was predicting that the world would end six days later.
Neal S. Wolin is the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury;
Peter Orszag is the Office of Management and Budget;
Stuart A. Levey is the Under Secretary for Financial Intelligence (and Terrorism);
Alan Krueger is the Assistant Secretary for Economic Policy;
Michael S. Barr is the Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions;
David S. Cohen is the Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing;
All of the above are Jewish, as is Larry Summers, the Chairman of the National Economic Council and the President’s top Financial Advisor.
Here are the rest of Obama’s top financial appointees:
Kim N. Wallace is the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Legislative Affairs and George W. Madison is General Counsel, US Department of the Treasury Secretary of Treasury. Both are black. Rosie Rios, the US Treasurer, is Hispanic.
Herbert M. Allison, the Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability and Daniel Tangherlini, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Management, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Performance Officer, are white.
Of Geithner's six counselors, five, Matthew Kabaker; Lewis Alexander; Lee Sachs; Jake Siewert and Gene Sperling, are also Jewish.
Here are a few more highly placed Jewish movers and shakers within the US adminstration:
Barney Frank - Chairman of the US House Committee on Financial Services;
Paul A. Volcker – Chairman of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board;
Steven L. Rattner – Director of the Task Force on the Auto Industry;
Kenneth R. Feinberg – Special Master for Compensation, US Treasury;
Jared Bernstein – Chief Economist and Policy Adviser, Vice President;
Peter R. Orszag – Director, Office of Management and Budget;
Douglas W. Elmendorf – Director, Congressional Budget Office;
Douglas H. Shulman – Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service;
Jon D. Leibowitz – Chairman, Federal Trade Commission;
Sheila C. Bair – Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation;
John E. Bowman – Director, Office of Thrift Supervision;
Karen G. Mills – Administrator, Small Business Administration.
As regards the Federal Reserve, the Chairman of the Board of Governors, Ben Bernanke, is also Jewish. He was top boy when the sh*t hit the fan in 2008.
The previous 19-year incumbent, Alan Greenspan, (knighted at the behest of Blair and Brown) who’s laissez-faire approach to economics make him more responsible than anyone else for the world’s financial meltdown, is also Jewish.
Donald L. Kohn, the Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors is Jewish, as is Stephen Friedman, the Chairman of the Bank’s Board of Directors.
Here is a list of the Presidents of the Federal Reserve District Banks:
Eric S. Rosengren - Boston;
Charles I. Plosser - Philadelphia;
Jeffrey M. Lacker - Richmond;
James B. Bullard - St. Louis;
Gary H. Stern - Minneapolis;
Thomas M. Hoeing - Kansas City;
Richard W. Fisher - Dallas;
Janet L. Yellen - San Francisco.
All of the above are Jewish.
William C. Dudley - New York; Sandra Pianalto - Cleveland; Dennis P. Lockhart - Atlanta and Charles L. Evans - Chicago, are non-Jewish.
When you consider that the Jews comprise around two percent of America’s citizenry, you can see how over-represented they are at the top financial table.
But this isn't all. Mary Schapiro, Chairperson of the Securities and Exchange Commission is Jewish. Gary Gensler, Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is Jewish. Daniel Roth, President and CEO of the National Futures Association is Jewish. Duncan L. Niederauer, CEO and Director of NYSE Euronext is Jewish. Robert Greifeld, Chief Executive Office of the NASDAQ OMX Group is Jewish.
There’s more. Bernard Madoff, the $50 billion dollar fraudster, is Jewish. Dick Fuld, testosterone-fuelled boss of Lehman brothers, whose trough-gobbling shenanigans precipated the bank’s demise, is Jewish.
The Jew, Robert Rubin, was the boss of Goldman Sachs before becoming Clinton's National Economic Council boss and then being promoted to Treasury Secretary, the top job. In 199, it was he who was responsible for the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act. After the 1929 Wall Street Crash, this was put in place to protect the little people from the attentions of the market's most amaoral and predatory beasts. After the repeal of Glass-Steagall, the unprotected cash of the trusting multitudes was, once again, up for grabs.
Rubin resigned and became Citigroup’s CEO in the same year he terminated Glass-Seagall.
A gentleman by the name of Roland Arnall, who was before his death known as 'the father of sub-prime,' was Jewish. James H. Simons was the world's leading hedge-fund manager in 2008, earning $2.5 billion when the rest of the financial world was falling down around OUR ears. He, too, is Jewish.
Sir Victor Blank, (knighted at the behest of Blair/Brown) Lloyds TSB's top man, bought RBS and blew his own bank out of the water as a result. Lloyds is now part-nationalised because of Blank's inexplicably inept management. He is Jewish, as is Fred 'the shred' Goodwin, former RBS Chairman and the most well known of the UK's trough-gobbling bankers.
On 22 October 2011, Robert Verkaik informed us thus in The Daily Mail:
"Liam Fox's unofficial adviser Adam Werritty was warned by MI6 that his interventions in Iranian politics risked jeopardising British diplomacy in the Middle East. Senior Whitehall officials told Mr Werritty to rein in his political activities which included visits to the Iranian capital Tehran and REGULAR CONTACT WITH DISSIDENT GROUPS WHO WANTED REGIME CHANGE.After Ed Miliband ordered Labour MPs to vote against a referendum on the EU, (David Cameron ordered his Tory backbenchers to do likewise) MP Kate Hoey said this on 20 October 2011:
Dr Fox, who resigned as Defence Secretary ten days ago over his contacts with Mr Werritty, has been accused of USING HIS BEST MAN AND FORMER FLATMATE TO RUN A SEPARATE FOREIGN POLICY…
Last night there were also concerns over the role played by BRITAIN'S AMBASSADOR TO ISRAEL, MATTHEW GOULD, WHO HELD A SERIES OF MEETINGS WITH DR FOX AND MR WERRITTY. The Foreign Office confirmed for the first time that Mr Gould had spoken to the two men while Dr Fox was a Shadow Defence spokesman and before Mr Gould was appointed to Tel Aviv last year…
Mr Werritty is a self-proclaimed expert on Iran and has made several visits. HE HAS ALSO MET SENIOR ISRAELI OFFICIALS, LEADING TO ACCUSATIONS THAT HE WAS CLOSE TO THE COUNTRY'S SECRET SERVICE, MOSSAD.
The Foreign Office declined to say whether Mr Gould had met Mr Werritty on his own. Nor would officials say what was discussed at the meeting with Dr Fox and Mr Werritty when Dr Fox was Shadow Defence spokesman. Of the second meeting between the three, after Dr Fox had taken up his Cabinet job, a spokesman said… ‘THERE IS NO SUCH POLICY TO OVERTHROW THE IRANIAN REGIME.'
Meanwhile, City of London Police last night confirmed that its OFFICERS WERE CONSIDERING INVESTIGATING MR WERRITTY FOR FRAUD.”
“Labour voters across the country will be very angry that Labour is taking the same view as the Tory leadership on this issue. This just shows how THE ESTABLISHMENT COLLUDES TO ENSURE THAT THE VOICE OF THE ORDINARY BRITISH CITIZEN IS SHUT OUT OF WHAT IS HAPPENING AT WESTMINSTER.”Confirming his decision to order his MPs to oppose the motion, Miliband said:
“We are going to be voting against a proposal for a referendum on getting out of Europe. IT’S NOT THE RIGHT THING FOR BRITAIN. IT IS NOT THE RIGHT THING FOR JOBS. IT IS NOT THE RIGHT THING FOR GROWTH.”The 'jobs' thing is one enormous p***-take, seeing as how ninety percent of all the jobs created by New Labour were gobbled up by foreigners.
Miliband's parents were both immigrant Jews. His father spent his life here commentating on the benefits and advantages of Marxist Communism.
The international speculator, George Soros, ‘the man who broke the Bank of England’, said this 25 October 2011:
"WE NOW HAVE A DYNAMIC OF DISINTEGRATION AT WORK. The European Union was built up by a self-reinforcing process, WITH THE LEADERSHIP LEADING THE MOVE TOWARDS GREATER INTEGRATION… People are looking for NATIONAL SOLUTIONS and that then creates a political dynamic that reinforces the dissolution…And we don't want that, do we George? The last thing folks like you want is for 'nationalist solutions' to jeopardise the globalist project.
The leadership is trying preserve the status quo… It is really a demonstration HOW UNGOVERNABLE THE EUROPEAN UNION HAS BECOME… The euro is in the process of endangering the EU politically.”
On 25 October 2011, BBC Newsbeat quoted Alan Schneider, as he played host at one of his company’s ’sugar daddy’ parties, thus:
"Men, you know what to do. WOMEN, RECEIVE THEIR GENEROSITY. WE WILL TOUCH YOU WITH PASSION AND FIRE ALL NIGHT LONG."Kind of makes your skin itch, doesn't it? Schneider, a sugar daddy himself, added:
"Traditional relationships of men being the provider and women being the caretaker of the family are coming back now. THEY'RE COMING BACK BECAUSE OF THE ECONOMY."Is he saying that, ‘because of the economy,’ the traditionally unequal ‘relationship’ of rich to poor, the latter being at the beck and call of the former, are ‘coming back’, we wonder?
It was the first time at a ‘sugar daddy’ party for Mandy, 24. She says:
"I'm looking to find A BOYFRIEND WHO'S WILLING TO HELP ME OUT with what I'm doing right now. Like a regular boyfriend BUT RICHER. I'm studying at the moment and college is expensive. It works well for me if I start dating A GUY WHO I KNOW CAN TAKE CARE OF ME FINANCIALLY SO I NO LONGER HAVE TO WORRY."Monique, who has already had one ‘relationship’ with a sugar daddy, added:
"I'm looking to advance myself to the next level. It's not just about the money, IT'S ABOUT WHAT A SUCCESSFUL PERSON CAN DO FOR YOU. IT'S ALMOST AN INSPIRATIONAL THING."That’s one way of putting it, Monique. Newsbeat told us more:
“At first you could only find them on dating websites, now there are big budget sugar daddy parties. The events are becoming a regular fixture in New York with the company behind them planning to introduce them in the UK. At one event near Times Square the club is sold out and the dancefloor is lined with men, most of them over 40. They're far outnumbered by the number of young women…Alan Schneider, by the way, is Jewish.
At these parties, any couples who get together usually come to what is formally called ‘an arrangement‘. Often that will be as simple as the man buying expensive gifts for his partner or paying her a certain amount of money each time they meet. Many women there say they have a price that they're not willing to negotiate below.
The company behind these events now say THEY WANT TO BRING THEM TO THE UK…
ONE OF THE MAJOR CRITICISMS ABOUT THESE EVENTS IS THAT THEY ARE SIMPLY A FORM OF PROSTITUTION.”
Middle-aged rich men; struggling young women?
Yeah. I’d call it this particular ‘inspirational thing’ prostitution, wouldn’t you? I’d also say that Alan Schneider is playing the role of pimp and Porn Baron here and the BBC are in the business of advertising his wares.
The BBC describes Newsbeat thus:
“Newsbeat is produced by BBC News but differs from the BBC's other news programmes in its remit to provide news TAILORED FOR A SPECIFICALLY YOUNGER AUDIENCE.”
On 25 October 2011, CBNC quoted former Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan thus:
"At the outset of the creation of the euro in 1999, it was expected that the southern eurozone economies would behave like those in the north; THE ITALIANS WOULD BEHAVE LIKE GERMANS. THEY DIDN’T. Instead, NORTHERN EUROPE FELL INTO SUBSIDIZING SOUTHERN EUROPE’S EXCESS CONSUMPTION… THE EFFECT OF THE DIVERGENT CULTURES IN THE EUROZONE HAS BEEN GROSSLY UNDERESTIMATED…In other words, globalisation, the forcing together of ‘divergent’ bits of the whole for ideological reasons, ‘simply can’t continue to work.’ (It never has, Alan. Not for the indigenous working-classes of the West, it hasn‘t)
The only way to have several currencies from divergent nations lumped together is IF THEY ARE CULTURALLY CLOSE, such as Germany, the Netherlands and Austria. IF THEY AREN’T, IT SIMPLY CAN’T CONTINUE TO WORK."
Nice admission, anyway. Northern Europe was forced to subsidize southern Europe’s ‘excess consumption’ at the behest of the international financiers, the globalists, the Greensapan types and their bought-and-paid-for politicians. It was they who, stupidly, ‘expected that the southern eurozone economies would behave like those in the north.’ Now, we are casually told THEY got it wrong.
What do think, ladies and gents? What price should the Greenspans pay for the financial meltdown? Do you, for example, believe that they should be allowed to keep their ill-gotten billions? More to the point, do you think they should be permitted to carry right on making more?
Greenspan was head of the Fed Res, the most powerful banking institution in the world, for the nineteen years that led up to the credit crunch of 2008. His laissez-faire, let-the-markets-decide, give-the-big-beasts-free-rein attitude to economics makes him, more than anyone else, responsible for the financial chaos and impoverishment we now face.
He is Jewish.
On 26 October 2011, David Kynaston told us this in The Telegraph:
"The stock market was deregulated 25 years ago today, reprising the City’s golden age, but THE 1980S BOOM IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR CURRENT BUST...
The eurozone unravelling, the governor of the Bank of England announcing the most serious financial crisis since the 1930s, Tent City dug in next to St Paul’s, it is piquant timing for today’s 25th anniversary of the City of London’s Big Bang…
Big Bang itself, on October 27, 1986... was essentially about deregulating the Stock Exchange. Above all, it enabled 100 per cent outside ownership of member firms – A MOVE ENFORCED BY THE THATCHER GOVERNMENT ON A LARGELY RELUCTANT CITY, so that London could operate on a modern, properly capitalised basis as an international financial centre.
For those with a historical perspective, UNDOUBTEDLY INCLUDING MARGARET THATCHER’S CHANCELLOR, NIGEL LAWSON, the gleam in the eye was the hope of reprising the City’s golden age, when London was the greatest financial centre the world had ever seen, disbursing capital and credit around the globe, before the guns of August 1914 changed everything.
The arrival of the Euromarkets in the 1960s, followed by the floating of exchange rates and abolition of exchange controls, began the RE-INTERNATIONALISATION of the City, but BIG BANG TOOK IT MUCH FURTHER: a legion of DEEP-POCKETED COMMERCIAL BANKS, OFTEN FOREIGN, BOUGHT UP LONG-ESTABLISHED BROKING AND JOBBING FIRMS… while simultaneously ambitious AMERICAN INVESTMENT BANKS SUCH AS GOLDMAN SACHS BEEFED UP THEIR LONDON PRESENCE AND WOULD RAPIDLY SUPPLANT THE BRITISH MERCHANT BANKS…
The gleam came to fruition. During the 1990s, neither Frankfurt nor Paris mounted a credible challenge to London as top European financial centre; by the new century, London was ahead of both New York and Tokyo in global terms; and for successive British governments, the City proved an almost miraculous (and relatively uncomplaining) cash cow…
I admire the energy and drive of the new City, in its human composition a FAR MORE DIVERSE and meritocratic place than the old City, where for so long whom you knew counted rather than what you knew. But at the same time, THE AMERICANISATION OF THE CITY, ABOVE ALL, THE DOMINANT INVESTMENT BANKING CULTURE , HAS HAD SOME SERIOUSLY CORROSIVE AND DAMAGING EFFECTS.
Long-term relationship banking has been replaced by short-term transactional banking, OFTEN INVOLVING OPPORTUNISTIC FINANCIAL ENGINEERING; the maximisation of profits, in pursuit of shareholder value, has meant AN INCREASING RELIANCE ON INTRINSICALLY RISKY PROPRIETARY TRADING; and, for the traders, the annual lure of the seven-figure bonus has seen them systematically engaged in ludicrously one-way bets, one-way because THEY ARE NOT PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOSSES (‘other people’s money‘), quite unlike the old City’s salutary partnership structure…
THE CITY REVOLUTION OF THE 1980S WAS PART OF A WIDER REVOLUTION, which in its totality raised the fundamental philosophical dilemma for the Right that still remains unresolved: how to reconcile the instincts of conservatism… and those of free-market capitalism (UNLEASHING NOSTALGIA-FREE FORCES OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION)...
Earlier this year The Daily Telegraph ran an illuminating interview with Mervyn King, WHO LAMENTED MODERN TRENDS IN FINANCIAL SERVICES: TOO MUCH EMPHASIS ON MAKING MONEY OUT OF CUSTOMERS, TOO LITTLE ON GIVING THEM A GENUINE SERVICE, AND THE MALIGN IMPACT OF CASINO TRADING. It was an arresting interview because of the almost unprecedented spectacle of THE GOVERNOR OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND SO EXPLICITLY ATTACKING CITY VALUES (OR LACK OF THEM)…
Given all the anecdotal and other evidence about the deep unpopularity of the City since 2008 – when the banks had to be bailed out by the taxpayer, WHO GOT SO LITTLE IN RETURN BUT INSTEAD HAD TO WATCH NEW ROUNDS OF THE CITY PAYING ITSELF HANDSOME BONUSES – it is surely plausible that such a critique strikes a chord… After all, a generation ago, the social and financial position of, say, a solicitor in Northampton was not so utterly different from, say, a stockbroker in Sevenoaks; but now, THE CITY (INCLUDING CANARY WHARF) FEELS LIKE AN ABSURDLY PRIVILEGED OFFSHORE ISLAND, LIVING IN A BUBBLE FAR REMOVED FROM THE EVERYDAY CONCERNS OF MOST PEOPLE.”
On 27 October 2011, Professor Lawrence Davidson said this at the Redress web site:
"Essentially, most Israelis live in a closed information environment. This is so despite their claim to have a free media. That media may be technically free, but it is nonetheless dominated by the nation’s Zionist ideology and the political and social assumptions it expounds. Counter views may indeed exist, but they do so only as rare exceptions or at the margins.On 28 October 2011, BBC economics editor Stephanie Flanders discussed the financial crisis with leading economic thinker, George Soros, and others.
So consistent is the Zionist interpretation of things that, for the country’s Jewish citizenry, it now constitutes a ‘thought collective’ and as such dictates the parameters of their thinking…
Gideon Levy, the Haaretz journalist who is one of those rare persons dwelling on the margins of Israeli journalism. He has somehow managed to escape the smothering impact of the ‘thought collective,’ or what he calls a ‘machinery of brainwashing’...
Levy is exceptional because he can ask ordinary questions that, nonetheless, go unasked by the vast majority. Take for instance the following comment he made during the self-aggrandizing Israel celebrations upon the release of Gilad Shalit.
Who isn’t against terror and for Shalit’s release? But that same sobbing society did not for a moment ask itself, with honesty and with courage, why Shalit was captured. It did not for a moment say to itself, with courage and honesty, that if it continued along the same path there will be many more Gilad Shalits, dead or captured.
In successive elections it voted, again and again, for centrist and right-wing governments, the kind that guarantee that Shalit will not be the last… No one ever told it that Shalit was the unavoidable price of a state that chooses to live by the sword forever…
As a consequence of his publicly-offered insight, Levy ‘has been shot at repeatedly by the Israel Defence Forces,’ been threatened with being ‘beaten to a pulp’ on the country’s streets and faced demands from government ministers that he be tightly monitored as ‘a security risk.’ According to the UK’s Independent newspaper, Levy might be either the ‘most hated man in Israel or just the most heroic’…
Israeli behaviour has managed to turn the Middle East, a region largely devoid of anti-Semitism until the intrusion of the Zionists, into a potential breeding ground for that obnoxious sentiment. And perhaps they will do the same to the American hinterland. That is called blowback. But the men in Jerusalem will never admit their responsibility for this. They say they always knew the world was anti-Semitic at heart and they will loudly proclaim they were right. It was there all the time, even in the heartland of their greatest ally. Such is the distorting power of a thought collective.”
During the course of the interview, Soros, who made $1bn in 1992 betting against the pound on Black Wednesday, said this:
“The thinking of the authorities is very much influenced by the economic theory and I think THERE IS SOMETHING FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG WITH THE ECONOMIC THEORY THAT HAS BEEN GUIDING US ALL THESE YEARS… THE WHOLE ECONOMIC THEORY IS SOMEHOW TRYING TO CREATE AN ARTIFICIAL WORLD WHERE… IMPERFECTIONS DON’T COME INTO PLAY…So don’t let the globalist project ‘fall apart’, you sheeple! Otherwise we’ll be devastated, eh George?
THIS WHOLE IDEA THAT…. PEOPLE PURSUING THEIR SELF-INTEREST ACTUALLY RESULTS IN BEST ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES IS, IN MY OPINION, A FALSE CONCEPTION… FALSE DOGMAS PLAY A VERY IMPORTANT ROLE IN SHAPING THE COURSE OF EVENTS…
THE EURO WAS ACTUALLY MISCONCEIVED. It was based on a false understanding of how currencies work… It was flawed… It was built on the idea that imbalances only occur in the public sector… The trouble in the Eurozone came also from the private sector. THERE WAS NO PROVISION IN THE WHOLE CONSTRUCT FOR THAT POSSIBILITY… It’s really the construction of the whole thing and the Central Bank that caused the whole thing…
THE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF BRITAIN ACTUALLY ARE MUCH WORSE THAN THE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF SPAIN but the risk premuim on Spanish bonds is higher because Spain can’t print its own money. BRITAIN CAN PRINT ITS OWN MONEY…
Europe faces a big, big challenge. It either, the Eurozone, it either now MOVES CLOSER TO A COMMON FISCAL POLICY or it will fall apart AND IF IT FALLS APART THE CONSEQUENCES WILL BE DEVASTATING not only for the Eurozone but for Britain, for the USA and for China. In other words FOR THE WHOLE WORLD.”
I know, why don’t we coalesce even more? Why don’t we just declare ‘the man who broke the Bank of England’, King of a one world government and be done with it? No more nation states, no more nationalism, just one, ‘great big melting pot’ full, one presumes, in short, Sorosian order, of ‘coffee coloured people by the score.'
Know what you mean, George. Know what you want and what you and you’re fellow trough gobblers are after. I guess that’d be a problem for the top table. Too many of the common herd knowing what THEY are really up to. Trouble is, when THEY have a problem, it always ends up being a problem for us as well.
PS. Thanks for warning us about the and ‘false dogma’ people who have been ’shaping the course of events’ in their own ‘self interest’ recently.
One might be forgiven for wondering why the 80-year-old multi-billionaire didn’t warn us decades ago, when it might have made a difference.
On 28 October 2011, Rob Marchant's essay, ‘Anti-Semitism is the new black’ appeared in The New Statesman.
This, in part, said:
“A month ago, enfant terrible designer John Galliano was fined over an anti-Semitic tirade at a Paris restaurant. But his drug-addled ramblings were just the latest signs of a wider trend. THERE ARE NUMEROUS RECENT INCIDENTS, ranging from an unpleasant flavour of anti-Israeli activism to straightforward RACISM, that should sound alarm bells for the liberals among us…A price must eventually be paid for the Iraqs, the nastiness in Palestine, the monumental greed of the fat cats, the political correctness, the media propaganda and the mass immigrations.
But there's a new twist on the ideological catwalk. We can visualise FAR-RIGHT THUGS indulging in this kind of thing but somehow we don't expect it from our comrades on the supposedly liberal-left…
And which mainstream group is unthinkingly giving succour to this new vogue? Step forward, Britain's trade unions, once the reliable ballast of the Labour right, who are increasingly being influenced, in their wilder conference pronouncements at least, by the far left…
THE WORST CULPRIT OF ALL, IN THE PROPAGATION OF THIS TWISTED FASHION, IS US. YOU AND ME. We of the Labour Party and the labour movement, because we are content to sit back and let it happen. It blights our society… This fashionable tolerance of RACISM, in imagined support of a cause, is unacceptable and must not go unchallenged.”
It was only a matter of time before Jewish over-representation in these areas became generally known. What goes around comes around, Rob. In the end, if you sh*t down its throat for long enough, even a dumbed-down, drugged-up world is liable to figure out that you're taking the mickey.
‘Anti-Semitism is the new black?’ Nah. It's the old, present-day and future dislike of Jewish misbehaviour, manipulation and dishonesty, bottled up and stoppered over the last six-and-a-half truth-censored decades to something approaching international boiling point.
So, now, we are told that ‘the supposedly liberal-left’ is complaining. Thing is, Rob, if the elephant in the room treads on their toes often enough, even its most fervent apologists are liable to squeal.
On 29 October 2011, Janet Daley said this in The Telegraph:
"This was the week that European democracy died. THE PLAN TO TACKLE THE EUROZONE CRISIS WILL ONLY RENDER ORDINARY PEOPLE MORE POWERLESS…Oh yes. The gangster elite get a substantial part of what what they’ve always wanted: the abolition of financial democracy and absolute oligarchal control over the purse-strings of the people. The abolition of political democracy, which is, for the most part, fake in any case, will, of course, follow naturally in its wake.
THE AGREED EU ‘STABILITY UNION’… WILL HAVE THE POWER TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE BUDGETS OF COUNTRIES IN THE EURO ZONE… BEFORE THEY ARE SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTED PARLIAMENTS OF THOSE COUNTRIES. In other words, PARLIAMENTS WHICH ARE DIRECTLY MANDATED BY, AND ANSWERABLE TO, THEIR OWN POPULATIONS WILL NOT CONTROL THE MOST ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF GOVERNMENT: DECISIONS ON TAXATION AND SPENDING… ACTUAL POWER OVER FISCAL POLICY WILL BE TAKEN FROM THE HANDS OF NATIONAL LEADERS."
"Since our own economic recovery relies so heavily on the stability of the euro… GEORGE OSBORNE HAS FOUND HIMSELF ENTHUSIASTICALLY SUPPORTING THIS RAPE OF DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLE."Hardly surprising, seeing as Osborne is one of THEM.
"Among those hapless, soon-to-be-disenfranchised peoples, hatreds have been awakened that the EU was, ironically, designed to bury. The Greeks hugely resent what they consider to be the implicitly racist contempt of the Germans… Even their moderate spokesmen are beginning to characterise Germany’s economic impositions as a revival of its wartime attempt at conquest.Oh yes. If the gangster elite do not get their way THEY WILL make war upon us! Or, at least, that is what THEY want us to think. Return the current European system to the status it had when the unmarried chap sold it to us in 1973. A collection of nation states trading equitably and most of the problems are solved in a trice. Greece et al get to devalue, the goods and services of the debtor nations become hugely attractive and, just like that, they are flooded with the filthy lucre of the more prosperous ones.
Through Greece’s historical perspective, it is not difficult to read German intentions as world domination by other means. INSTEAD OF BURYING THE OLD ENMITIES AND BLOOD FEUDS, THE ENFORCED CONDITIONS OF THE EU HAVE REINVIGORATED THEM…
When ANGELA MERKEL WARNED LAST WEEK ABOUT THE POSSIBLE END OF THE BLESSEDLY LONG POST-WAR PEACE IN EUROPE, she meant that the failure of the euro (and thus of the EU project) would precipitate economic chaos AND POSSIBLY LEAD TO WAR."
Simple, isn’t it? But simple solutions are not what the world-government-run-by-THEM-forever crowd are about. THEY want total control over us. And THEY are determined to have it by whatever means.
"THIS IS A SYSTEM THAT IS INHERENTLY FLAWED, AND THEREFORE CANNOT BE MADE TO WORK IN THE TERMS IN WHICH IT WAS ENVISAGED. Far from being an antidote to the ideological delusions of the past century, A TRANS-NATIONAL SUPERSTATE IS THE SAME SORT OF UTOPIAN, UNNATURAL, AHISTORICAL FOLLY THAT EARLIER GENERATIONS ATTEMPTED TO FOIST ON THE RECALCITRANT POPULATIONS OF EUROPE. ITS DOCTRINE OF ‘CO-OPERATION’ IS SIMPLY COERCION BY ANOTHER NAME. IT RELIES ON UNSWERVING BELIEF AND ENFORCED CONFORMITY, just like all the ‘year zero’ political movements that ended in totalitarianism and terror in the past.Oh, we understand it alright, Janet. However, I’m not at all sure awareness of what’s afoot is a cause for 'hope.' The shiny-eyed types might protest a tad but the vast majority, in our country at least, will just continue to take it. As they always have.
The one hope is that the great mass of the people, UNLIKE MOST OF THEIR POLITICAL LEADERS, seem to understand all this quite clearly."
It’s the sheeple way, I’m afraid.
On 1 November 2011, The Guardian quoted Palestinian Authority spokesman, Ghassan Khatib, thus:
"There has been a sustained attack since the morning from many sources in many countries. IT IS DELIBERATE AND CONTINUOUS."
The Palestinian Telecoms Minister, Mashour Abu Daqqa, told Reuters:
"All Palestinian IP addresses have been exposed to a focused, organised attack from abroad. I THINK THIS IS ORGANISED BY A STATE".The Guardian explained:
“Internet services in the West Bank and Gaza have come under ‘sustained attack’ by unknown hackers in multiple locations... The attack came the day after THE PALESTINIANS WON A SYMBOLICALLY SIGNIFICANT VICTORY AT UNESCO, which voted overwhelmingly on Monday to admit the Palestinian Authority as a full member. THE MOVE TRIGGERED PUNITIVE FINANCIAL SANCTIONS AGAINST THE UN AGENCY BY THE US.”Hands up who thinks they know which state ‘organised’ the attack?
Yep, that’s what I think too.
On 1 November 2011, subsequent to the UNESCO vote recognising a Palestinian state, Republican Congresswoman, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, called UNESCO’s behaviour ‘ANTI-ISRAEL AND ANTI-PEACE.’ She added:
“This is only the beginning. THE PALESTINIANS WILL NOW SEEK FULL MEMBERSHIP IN OTHER U.N. BODIES.”Wow! That’s not on, is it? Can’t allow the Palestinians the democracy the ret of us supposedly enjoy! Dearie me, no. Ros-Lehtinen continues:
“EXISTING U.S. LAW MANDATES THAT WE CUT OFF FUNDING TO ANY U.N. BODY THAT APPROVES SUCH A REQUEST.”
Really? There’s a US law saying that any UN body that encourages the same democracy for Palestine must be deprived of funds? WOW! Ros-Lehtinen continues:
“The Administration must stop trying to find ways not to fully implement this law, and instead CUT OFF FUNDING TO UNESCO IMMEDIATELY. And CONGRESS MUST PASS PENDING U.N. REFORM LEGISLATION TO CUT OFF FUNDING TO ANY U.N. ENTITY THAT GRANTS ANY UPGRADED STATUS TO PALESTINE.”On the same day, Republican Congressman, Tom Price, Chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee, said:
“THE UNITED STATES HAS SHOWN OUR DISAPPROVAL OF THIS ACTION BY CUTTING OFF FUNDING FOR UNESCO. We must continue to show strength as the Palestinian leadership attempts to undermine negotiations and circumvent the peace process. ISRAEL REMAINS A CRUCIALLY IMPORTANT ALLY TO THE UNITED STATES…Former UN ambassador, John Bolton, said:
The United States is ready and willing to work with those who seek peace and must show interested parties that WE WILL NOT STAND FOR SUCH RECKLESS AVOIDANCE OF THE PATH TO PEACE.”
“UNESCO, true to form, has voted today to admit the Palestinian Authority as a member… France voted in favor of Palestinian membership, and Britain and Japan abstained…These Great Satan types don’t mince words, do they? They’re not exactly interested in nuance and subtlety. Messrs Ros-Lehtinen, Price and Bolton tell it how it is. No diplomats they. ‘Israel remains a crucially important ally’! Consequently the Palestinians and their democratic ambitions may go forth and multiply strenuously!
US STATUTES, DATING FROM 1990, NOW REQUIRE A FULL CUTOFF OF US FUNDING, which Congress should insist occur immediately. Should the Administration seek changes in the applicable statutory provisions, would eliminate or weaken the funding cutoff, CONGRESS SHOULD REJECT THEM… UNESCO has made its decision: IT PREFERS PALESTINIAN MEMBERSHIP TO AMERICAN PARTICIPATION. Now let the rest of the U.N. specialized agencies make their choice.”
I really do think the ‘world’s policeman’ b*llocks is now a busted flush. The US polices the world alright but not on behalf of the decent. Not on behalf of the righteous or good. The US polices the world on behalf of the Ros-Lehtinens, Prices, Boltons and those who pay their wages.
The US and its best mate Israel are out of control, to say the least. Time we got our own bought-and-paid-for politicos to associate with a better class of contabulary self-server, methinks.
As regards to the loss of Yankee cash, well, the US isn’t exactly solvent right now, is it? How much longer do you think the piggy bank piggies would be able to carry on forking out anyway?
Better a less bribable, more honourable world, eh? Better that the bully be deprived of his power evn if it means the bullied end up with a little less pocket money.
Let’s hope, as Ms Ros-Lehtinen says, that ‘this is only the beginning.’
On 2 November 2011, Matt Liebowitz of told us this at Microsoft’s Security News:
“Security experts have dug deeper into the Duqu Trojan and discovered a scary shared characteristic between the newly discovered piece of malware and last year's infamous Stuxnet worm, supporting the theory THAT THE SAME AUTHORS ARE BEHIND BOTH. The Hungarian security firm CrySyS, which discovered Duqu in October, found that IT HIDES IN A MICROSOFT WORD DOCUMENT and contains something astonishing: a zero-day exploit of A VULNERABILITY IN THE WINDOWS KERNEL, THE VERY HEART OF THE OPERATING SYSTEM.But not us? Not my computer or yours? I’m sceptical to say the least.
Zero-day exploits are the Holy Grail for hackers. Unknown flaws in software are few and far between, and when one is found, CYBERCRIMINALS EXPLOIT IT AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE during the brief precious window before the software maker patches it. The fact that Duqu contains one zero-day, and Stuxnet four, yet both programs steal nothing, indicates that THEIR MAKERS ARE BOTH HIGHLY SKILLED, MOTIVATED BY SOMETHING OTHER THAN MONEY AND WILLING TO SQUANDER KNOWLEDGE THAT COULD BE WORTH MILLIONS TO SECURE THEIR OBJECTIVES…
Stuxnet was designed to sabotage nuclear facilities in Iran, BUT ALSO INFECTED SYSTEMS IN INDIA AND INDONESIA. DUQU INFECTIONS HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED IN IRAN AS WELL AS IN SUDAN, INDIA, VIETNAM, FRANCE, THE NETHERLANDS, SWITZERLAND AND UKRAINE.”
On 2 November 2011, Sky News Middle East correspondent, Emma Hurd, reported thus:
"ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU IS TRYING TO RALLY SUPPORT IN HIS CABINET FOR AN ATTACK ON IRAN, according to government sources. THE COUNTRY'S DEFENCE MINISTER EHUD BARAK AND THE FOREIGN MINISTER AVIGDOR LIEBERMAN ARE SAID TO BE AMONG THOSE BACKING A PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKE TO NEUTRALISE IRAN'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS...On 2 November the Jewish-American journalist, Ben Shapiro, said this at Townhall.com
Mr Lieberman responded to the reports of a push to gain cabinet approval by saying that ‘IRAN POSES THE MOST DANGEROUS THREAT TO WORLD ORDER.’ But he said ISRAEL'S MILITARY OPTIONS SHOULD NOT BE A MATTER FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION.”
“Benjamin Netanyahu… has been bringing home hostages such as Gilad Shalit in anticipation of an attack on Iran. When that attack takes place, Netanyahu knows, every Jew in Muslim territory will be endangered.Not much room for doubt as to whose side Benny is on, is there? Nope. There’s no equivocation at all here. This guy is for ’brutal dictators,’ an ’attack on Iran’ and the ‘Arab Spring… buried beneath its own ashes.’
Why the sudden urgency from Israel?… The answer lies in President Obama's support for Islamist regimes across the Middle East. The Arab Spring… was an Islamist revolution of the worst sort, toppling BRUTAL DICTATORS WITH WHOM WE COULD DEAL with in favor of POPULIST Islamist movements that we cannot. And Obama stands behind all of it.
It started with his invitation to members of the Muslim Brotherhood, the supposedly moderate group that stands behind Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaida and virtually every other terrorist entity in the region, to attend his speech in Cairo in 2009. His words in Cairo emboldened Islamists; his appeasement rhetoric suggested that the conflict between Western civilization and radical Islam is a mere misunderstanding, and just a few days before that, his statements calling America ‘one of the largest Muslim countries in the world,’ told Islamists that they had nothing to fear from the United States.
That was doubly true for Iran. America's policy on Iran has been feckless for the better part of three decades… Obama made clear from the outset that he would do nothing about Iran. In the presidential debates, he said he would meet with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad; since Obama's ascendance to the White House, Ahmadinejad has visited the United States repeatedly… The United States will do nothing to prevent Iran, THE MOTHER LODE OF EVIL IN TODAY'S WORLD, from going nuclear.
Perhaps if Obama had shown half as much worry about the turn of the Middle East towards Islamism that he now shows towards AN ATTACK ON ISLAMIST NUCLEAR FACILITIES, we wouldn't be in this situation. Israel wouldn't stand alone. But it does, and it will, against all odds. MAY THE HITLERIAN ARAB SPRING END THE SAME WAY AS HITLER'S EMPIRE DID: IN UTTER FAILURE, BURIED BENEATH ITS OWN ASHES.”
As for what the people want, if their democracies don’t suit the Jew, ‘populist… movements’ can go to hell. And, of course, if you disagree with Benny’s appraisal, it is almost certain that you will be a ‘racist’, a ’hater’, a ‘Hitlerian’ Nazi whose outlook needs adjustment.
Hey, Benny! I’m guessing that if ‘who is the mother lode of evil in today’s world’ was a quiz question, a whole lot more people would answer ‘Israel’ than ‘Iran’! Oops! Here’s me, a Nazi, (according to the Benny type) indulging in ‘appeasement rhetoric’ just like Obama. Who is, according to Benny, an Islamist.
It’s a funny, old ‘Western civilisation,’ isn’t it?
The above is pretty typical of Ben Shapiro’s output. Check out what he was saying at the same web site on 27 August 2003:
“The time for HALF MEASURES has passed. BULLDOZING HOUSES of homicide bombers is useless. Instituting ONGOING CURFEWS in Arab-populated cities is useless. ROADBLOCKS, TOUCH FENCES, midnight negotiations and cease-fires are useless.Like I said, there’s no equivocation in our Benny.
Some have RIGHTLY suggested that Israel be allowed to DECAPITATE THE TERRORIST LEADERSHIP OF THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY. But this too is ONLY A HALF MEASURE. The ideology of the Palestinian population is indistinguishable from that of the terrorist leadership. Half measures merely postpone our realization that the Arabs dream of Israel's destruction. Without drastic measures, the Arab dream will come true…
Here is the bottom line: If you believe that the Jewish state has a right to exist, then YOU MUST ALLOW ISRAEL TO TRANSFER THE PALESTINIANS AND THE ISRAELI-ARABS FROM JUDEA, SAMARIA, GAZA AND ISRAEL PROPER…
There is certainly room in the spacious Muslim states of the Middle East for 5 million Palestinians and Israeli Arabs… PALESTINIANS, whose claim to Judea, Samaria and Gaza is dubious at best, CAN BE EXPELLED. IT'S TIME TO STOP BEING SQUEAMISH. Jews are not Nazis. Transfer is not genocide. And ANYTHING ELSE ISN'T A SOLUTION.”
On 3 November 2011, the French Prime Minister, Nicolas Sarkozy, was overheard saying this to the US President, Barack Obama:
“NETANYAHU, I CAN'T STAND HIM. HE'S A LIAR.”Obama responded thus:
“You're sick of him but I HAVE TO DEAL WITH HIM EVERY DAY.”When the rats begin to eat each other in public you know the Plague Year is almost over.
On 3 November 2011, The Telegraph’s Will Heaven reported thus:
“Mossad was ecstatic when the Stuxnet computer worm infiltrated Iran’s nuclear programme almost two years ago. According to Der Spiegel, Israeli spies viewed it as ‘comparable to the cracking of Germany’s Enigma cipher machine’…I wonder how many tens of millions of ordinary household computers were infected by Stuxnet world-wide? As Wikipedia tells us, ‘It targets Siemens industrial software AND equipment running Microsoft Windows.’
The virus, almost certainly engineered jointly by the US and Israel, appeared to have ‘wiped out roughly a fifth of Iran’s nuclear centrifuges’ when it hit the country's enrichment facilities, said the New York Times…
But things aren't looking so rosy today. Con Coughlin notes that THE DRUMBEAT OF WAR AGAINST IRAN IS BEATING LOUDER, and all the evidence supports that. BENJAMIN NETANYAHU HAS BEEN SEEKING CABINET SUPPORT FOR A MILITARY STRIKE ON IRAN; BRITAIN'S ARMED FORCES ARE STEPPING UP THEIR CONTINGENCY PLANNING FOR POTENTIAL MILITARY ACTION (THE MOD REPORTEDLY THINKS THE US MAY FAST-FORWARD PLANS FOR MISSILE STRIKES…
It appears that the success of Stuxnet was vastly overstated…
RECENT POLITICAL MOVES FROM THE US, ISRAEL AND BRITAIN, WHICH HAVE ALL EXPLICITLY MENTIONED MILITARY ACTION, would suggest that the West will no longer rely heavily on clever computer viruses to counter this kind of threat. Instead, IN THE CASE OF WAR, IT LOOKS LIKE THEY'LL OPT FOR OLD-FASHIONED BOMBS AND MISSILES.”
On 6 November 2011, Simon Walters and Glen Owen said this in The Daily Mail:
"Ed Miliband's controversial new MULTI-MILLIONAIRE BACKER made a series of attempts to perform a similar role for the Tories over a ten-year period, it has emerged. PROPERTY TYCOON ANDREW ROSENFELD, SAID TO BE WORTH MORE THAN £100?MILLION, bombarded Conservative HQ with phone calls and emails promising money and other support. But he was rebuffed after worried Tory officials learned he was making similar approaches to Labour, who were also considering giving him a peerage.
Mr Rosenfeld came under fire last week after The Mail on Sunday told how he bought an £8.5?million house in cash, while HIS FORMER HOME IN A TAX HAVEN CAN BE RENTED FOR MORE THAN £16,000 A MONTH. Tory MPs claimed it made a nonsense of Mr Miliband’s attacks on capitalist ‘predators."
Rosenfeld is Jewish. As is Miliband.
In his 8 November 2009 Sunday Times essay on Goldman Sachs, John Arlidge interviewed a variety of employees at 'the world's most powerful, and most secretive, investment bank.'
He tells us that Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman’s Chairman and Chief Executive, is 'in a remarkably jolly mood for a man everyone seems to hate.' 'I know I could slit my wrists and people would cheer,' says Blankfein. Arlidge takes up the story:
“Washington has bolstered the US economy and banks to the tune of $12 TRILLION. Does Blankfein not acknowledge that IT IS MADDENING FOR MOST OF US TO WATCH GOLDMAN GOBBLE UP SO MUCH CASH WHILE WE STRUGGLE? Quite the opposite. He insists WE SHOULD BE CELEBRATING HIS BANK’S SUCCESS, NOT CONDEMNING IT. ‘EVERYBODY SHOULD BE, FRANKLY, HAPPY,’ he says.The ’banker doing God's work’ is, of course, Jewish.
Can he be serious? Deadly… Blankfein goes on to say something equally audacious. WE SHOULD WELCOME THE RETURN OF TITANIC PAYDAYS AT GOLDMAN…
Okay, forget bail-outs, forget bonuses, forget all the money stuff, if you can. Surely… IT IS ‘BLACKMAIL’ TO SAY THAT THERE CANNOT BE A RECOVERY UNLESS WE LET BANKERS GET ON WITH WHAT THEY HAVE ALWAYS DONE AND PAY THEMSELVES SQUILLIONS… ‘I’ve got news for you,’ he shoots back, eyes narrowing. ‘IF THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM GOES DOWN, OUR BUSINESS IS GOING DOWN AND, TRUST ME, YOURS AND EVERYONE ELSE’S IS GOING DOWN, TOO’…
Goldman Sachs isn’t nicknamed ‘Goldmine Sachs’ for nothing. There’s so much of the stuff sloshing around that IN AN AVERAGE YEAR A GOOD INVESTMENT BANKING PARTNER WILL MAKE $3.5M, A GOOD TRADING PARTNER $7-10M AND A MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEMBER $15-25M. SOME 953 EMPLOYEES GOT BONUSES OF AT LEAST $1M IN 2008.…
THE LIST OF FORMER GOLDMAN EXECUTIVES WHO HAVE HELD KEY POSTS IN THE US ADMINISTRATION AND VITAL GLOBAL INSTITUTIONS IN NEW YORK AND WASHINGTON ALONE IS MIND-BOGGLING.
Goldman Sachs may be a Wall Street bank, but ITS ROLE AND INFLUENCE IN LONDON IS HUGE. AROUND 5,500 PEOPLE WORK IN ITS FLEET STREET OFFICE… It is the most profitable bank in the City. Profits per employee averaged £181,000 a year between 2000 and 2008. AVERAGE PAY THIS YEAR IS EXPECTED TO BE £458,000...
The London office is run by Michael Sherwood and Richard Gnodde. Sherwood… seems to model himself on his good friend, the BHS billionaire Sir Philip Green...
Not all Goldmanites avoid the headlines. An abiding tale of the boom years is how three London executives, Jennifer Moses and her husband, Ron Beller, and Scott Mead, had so much cash they did not notice when an assistant, Joyti De-Laurey, stole more than £4m from their accounts... (Moses, an American Jewess, was recruited by Gordon Brown to advise on social policy. Her husband's hedge fund, Pelaton, collapsed, owing shareholders millions, following the credit crunch)
As in the US, the bank is closely linked to the government. Its former chief economist and partner, Gavyn Davies, is married to Gordon Brown’s special adviser Sue Nye. Under Tony Blair, Davies became chairman of the BBC.
His successor as chief economist at Goldman, the late David Walton, was handed a seat on the Bank of England’s interest-rate setting Monetary Policy Committee. Paul Deighton, who is running the London Olympic Games organising committee, used to be Goldman’s chief operating officer. Goldman is a key banking adviser to the government. Brown hired the bank to advise him on the sale of Northern Rock last year.
US treasury secretaries, heads of the New York Stock Exchange, White House and Downing Street advisers — you name it, they’ve worked for Goldman Sachs…
IN 2007, THE GOLDMAN SACHS BOSS LLOYD BLANKFEIN EARNED $68M, A RECORD FOR ANY WALL STREET CEO. A GOOD INVESTMENT BANKING PARTNER AT GOLDMAN WILL MAKE $3.5M A YEAR, A GOOD TRADING PARTNER $7-10M A YEAR, AND A MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEMBER $15-25M...
GOLDMAN’S PROFITS IN THE SECOND QUARTER OF THIS YEAR WERE A RECORD $3.4 BILLION...
Vince Cable warns: ‘If we’ve learnt anything, it’s that BANKS HAVE TOO MUCH POWER OVER CONSUMERS AND GOVERNMENTS. GOLDMAN SACHS HAS NEVER BEEN MORE POWERFUL. THAT SHOULD ALARM ALL OF US’…
For Blankfein, in the end, it all comes down to one thing: FINDING THE BEST, FASTEST, AND SAFEST WAY TO MAKE MONEY WITH MONEY, THEN MAKE SOME MORE MONEY, WITH MONEY ON TOP. He’s not interested in a reality check, JUST A BUMPER PAY CHEQUE FOR HIS CLIENTS, FOR HIS FIRM, FOR HIS STAFF, FOR HIS SHAREHOLDERS...
GOLDMAN SACHS, THIS PILLAR OF THE FREE MARKET, BREEDER OF SUPER-CITIZENS... WILL GO ON RAKING IT IN, GETTING RICHER THAN GOD? An impish grin spreads across Blankfein’s face. CALL HIM A FAT CAT WHO MOCKS THE PUBLIC. CALL HIM WICKED. Call him what you will.
He is, he says, ‘JUST A BANKER ‘DOING GOD’S WORK'."
Of those mentioned in John Arlidge’s entire essay (most of which is accessible at the link below), I think Richard Gnodde; Reuben Jeffery and Scott Mead are Jewish. Robert Rubin; Stephen Friedman; Timothy Geithner; Joshua Bolten; Robert Hormats; Gary Gensler; Duncan Niederauer; Barney Frank; Michael Sherwood; Jennifer Moses; Ron Beller; Larry Summers, Yoel Zaoui and the Rothschilds, past and present, definitely are.
As were the original Messrs Goldman and Sachs.
PS. On 27 June 2007, Money Week told us this:
“When Sir Ronald Cohen resigned from Apax Partners in 2005, after more than 30 years in the private-equity industry… it meant a new political role. A GENEROUS LABOUR PARTY DONOR, THE ‘FATHER OF VENTURE CAPITAL’ THREW HIS WEIGHT BEHIND GORDON BROWN, emerging as THE INCOMING PM’S CHIEF FUND-RAISER, BUSINESS AIDE AND LINK TO THE CITY. HE’S LIKELY TO WIELD FAR MORE POWER IN THE NEW GOVERNMENT THAN MANY CABINET MINISTERS.Refugee, ‘Jewish merchants,’ ‘250m fortune,’ ‘father of venture capital’, ‘chief fund-raiser, business aide and link to the City.’ The unelected foreigner with ‘far more power’ certainly ticked all the global, PC and Court Jew boxes, didn’t he?
It’s tempting to draw comparisons with Lord Levy, Tony Blair’s ‘private banker’ and sometime Middle Eastern envoy… But Cohen is in a different league… a man of intellectual distinction, amassing a £250m fortune while presenting himself as ‘the acceptable and responsible face of private equity’…
The focus has now switched to his own personal tax affairs. Should it emerge that, as a NON-DOMICILED BRITISH RESIDENT, he enjoys ‘AN ADVANTAGEOUS ARRANGEMENT OFFSHORE,’ the damage to Brown’s shiny new government could be significant…
Born in Cairo in 1945 to a family of Jewish merchants, he became a refugee at the age of 11... Ronald… spoke no English.”
PPS. The US-Hungarian financier, George Soros, was the prime mover behind Black Wednesday. He is estimated to have made around a billion dollars from that particular Brit-bashing scam. Soros is also Jewish.
On 10 November 2011, The Daily Mail told us that 'ministers have been told to expect Israeli military action' against Iran and quoted a ‘senior Foreign Office figure’ thus:
“We’re expecting something as early as Christmas, or very early in the new year.”The Mail added:
“ISRAEL WILL LAUNCH MILITARY ACTION to prevent Iran developing a nuclear weapon as soon as Christmas, intelligence chiefs have warned… Sources say the understanding at the top of the British Government is that ISRAEL WILL ATTEMPT TO STRIKE AGAINST THE NUCLEAR SITES ‘SOONER RATHER THAN LATER’, WITH LOGISTICAL SUPPORT FROM THE US…Oh yes. Jewish support for a second Presidential term is much more important than lighting the blue, nuclear touch paper of World War III.
Officials believe President Barack OBAMA WOULD HAVE TO SUPPORT THE ISRAELIS OR RISK LOSING VITAL JEWISH-AMERICAN SUPPORT IN THE NEXT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.”
On 26 November 2011, The Telegraph's Christopher Booker posed the question, 'is the global warming scare the greatest delusion in history?'
I replied thus:
"NO. The '6 Million Jews lost their lives at the hands of the Nazis in WWII' lie is the 'greatest delusion'. Anywhere between 300,000 and ten times that number died during the course of the war. But not 6 million.To which alan_c responded:
AND THE MAIN PLAYERS KNOW IT! But they will not back off from the lie. Why should they? They managed to make it an unquestionable religion for many.
The truth doesn't figure in the moral vocabulary of those who sold us what some are minded to call the Holohoax."
"If you have seen the images of the pile of dead bodies awaiting cremation in the death camps why would you quibble over numbers? You're sick friend, go get help."I replied:
"That's what the PC Crowd always does. It sneers at the truth-teller and the truth when the truth doesn't suit it. alan-c's 'sick' observation would suggest that a 'pile of dead bodies', say 100-strong, could legitimately be extrapolated into a pile dead bodies 6 million-strong at the whim of the establishment.On 27 November 2011, Brian Brady said this in The Sunday Independent:
And, if one is in the business of being emotionally evocative, how would 'a pile of bodies awaiting cremation' compare with the shadows of the dead already cremated at Dresden and Hamburg? (Or Hiroshima/Nagasarki)
In practical terms, the German people have been forced over the years to pay reparations based on the 6 million figure. Fairness would suggest that they should have paid reparations based upon the ACTUAL figure, not a mythological one.
Anyway, what's wrong with the truth? If less than six million Jews died during the course of WW2, why should we not know the actual total? Why should we be strong-armed into believing a fashionable lie? If, say, three million died, why would you sneer at those who would have this figure known if it happens to be more accurate?
If 400,000 British people died during the course of WW2, should we have been told that a million died, just to reinforce our hatred of the Germans? If 35,000 died in the firebombing of Dresden, should we have been told that only 35 died, in order to make Churchill and co. look a little better?
You are a propagandist, Al. You prefer the spin and the lie. I prefer the truth. In many more minds than yours, in this Godforsaken day and age, that makes me 'sick.'
Thing is, this sicko can PROVE, beyond all question, that less than six million died. You do not know anyone who can PROVE the schoolroom mythology. In fact, when questioned upon the subject, the usual response from the powers-that-be is an alan_c sneer and, in some 'democratic' European countries, threats of prosecution and imprisonment if the myth-buster persists in his attempts to have the facts made known. There are, indeed, historians in jail as we speak for attempting to enlighten the multitudes.
Big Brother would have you imagine that I am 'sick' for suggesting that the most sacred tenet of a generally accepted quasi-religious belief is factually inaccurate. I would have us check out what he wants us to think a little more closely than we are wont to do.
As for Big Brother's most earnest disciples, there's a world that describes them very adequately. Sheeple. Unquestioning followers of the Shepherd."
“Liam Fox, Adam Werritty and the curious case of Our Man in Tel Aviv... The curious duo was in fact, at times, a trio. They had had two meetings with Matthew Gould, Britain's ambassador to Israel, adding to claims that THEY WERE RUNNING A PIRATE (PRO-ISRAEL, OR ANTI-IRANIAN?) FOREIGN POLICY… Liam Fox and his adviser met Britain's ambassador at least four times more than was previously admitted. So why were we not told this before? Isn't this yet more evidence that THEY WERE OPERATING OUTSIDE THE CONTROL OF THE FOREIGN OFFICE?…On 2 December 2011, the President of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, said this in a major policy speech before 5,000 supporters in Toulon:
THE THREE MEN MET IN TEL AVIV AT ‘A PRIVATE DINNER WITH SENIOR ISRAELIS’ and, BEFORE Mr Gould took up the ambassador's post in Tel Aviv, FOR ‘A GENERAL DISCUSSION OF INTERNATIONAL DEFENCE AND SECURITY MATTERS’…
The IoS revealed last month that Mr Werritty had visited Iran on several occasions and was SO HIGHLY REGARDED BY THE ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE SERVICE MOSSAD THAT HE WAS ABLE TO ARRANGE MEETINGS AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT…
Craig Murray submitted a Freedom of Information request to the Foreign Office very late one night last week, asking for all communications between Mr Gould and Mr Werritty; barely an hour later, HE RECEIVED A REJECTION, explaining that his request was ‘likely to exceed the cost limit’…
‘It is plainly nonsense that to gather correspondence between two named individuals would be too expensive,’ Mr Murray said. ‘They could just ask Gould’.”
“Europe could be swept by the crisis if it doesn't PULL ITSELF TOGETHER AND CHANGE… Europe is no longer a choice. It is a necessity… EUROPE MUST BE RETHOUGHT. IT MUST BE REESTABLISHED… If Europe does not change quickly enough history will write itself without it. Europe needs more political responsibility…Oh, No! The rest of you are coming with us! Or else! Thus does the eternal Jew press on for the one world order, with him, of course, in charge. Aided and abetted by his Commie (Merkel is East German) henchwoman.
THE REFORM OF EUROPE is not a march towards supra-nationality. THE INTEGRATION OF EUROPE will go the inter-govermental way…
France and Germany, after so many tragedies, have decided to UNITE THEIR DESTINY AND LOOK TO THE FUTURE TOGETHER… F%RANCE AND GERMANY UNITED means ALL OF EUROPE that is UNITED and stronger…
There is a reality that everybody must understand, that EVERYONE HAS TO ACCEPT. SOVEREIGNTY IS ONLY POSSIBLE WITH OTHERS…
THE CRISIS IS NOT FINISHED... The same crisis that hit banks is now hitting states. It is hitting all developed countries whether left-wing or right-wing..
WE WILL NOT RE-TAKE CONTROL OF OUR DESTINY ALONE… WE WILL NOT CHANGE THE RULES OF GLOBALISATION ALONE."
Makes one wonder whether the various financial crises weren’t invented by the creatures in the shadows, doesn’t it? Whether all this b***ocks was just the means the Machiavellians dreamt up to a very dark end for most of us.
On 17 January 2012, Graham Peebles, Director of The Create Trust, said this at the PalestineChronicle.com web site:
"Israel is supported, sustained and supplied, in words, arms and deed by the US. During 2011, the U.S. provided Israel with at least $8.2 million per day in military aid alone. The One who rides shotgun above any treatise, convention and or nation, Big American Brother, allows [Israel] to dissent, encourages violation of international law and leads by example...On 29 January 2012, French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, sneereed thus on French TV:
It seems international laws apply to some but not to others, 'Do unto others as ye would have others do unto you'. Good idea unless it's Israel or their Godfather in and of arms, America...
Enough, enough of the injustice, violence and fear."
"The United Kingdom has no industry any more."
The following day, Le Monde replied:
"Industrial decline is stronger in our country... In 2007, industry accounted for 16.7 per cent of (the UK's) GDP against 14.1 per cent for France: a statistic that did not change in 2011."Nevertheless, Sarkozy's little dig remains substantially true. 16.7 per cent is sweet FA.
On 31 January 2012, Mac Slavo told us this at Intel Hub:
"While President Obama’s supporters hailed his withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq as the end of the war in the middle east, BEHIND THE SCENES THE PENTAGON HAS BEEN QUIETLY MASSING TROOPS AND ARMAMENTS ON TWO ISLANDS LOCATED JUST SOUTH OF THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ, AND WITHIN EASY STRIKING DISTANCE OF IRAN.On 1 February 2012, Kim Sengupta reported thus in The Belfast Telegraph:
In addition to some 50,000 U.S. troops currently in the region waiting for orders (apparently they won’t be home by this past Christmas as was originally promised), Nobel Peace Prize winner President Barack Obama is deploying an additional 50,000 soldiers to be ready for ‘any contingency’ by March.
President Barack Obama is reported exclusively by DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s military and Washington sources to have secretly ordered US air, naval and marine forces to build up heavy concentrations on two strategic islands, Socotra, which is part of a Yemeni archipelago in the Indian Ocean, and the Omani island of Masirah at the southern exit of the Strait of Hormuz.
Since 2010, the US has been quietly building giant air force and naval bases on Socotra with facilities for submarines, intelligence command centers and take-off pads for flying stealth drones, as part of a linked chain of strategic US military facilities in the Indian Ocean and Persian Gulf. The Socotra facilities are so secret that they are never mentioned in any catalogue listing US military facilities in this part of the world, which include Jebel Ali and Al Dahfra in the United Arab Emirates; Arifjan in Kuwait; and Al Udeid in Qatar – all within short flying distances from Iran.
Additional US forces are also being poured into Camp Justice on the barren, 70-kilometer long Omani island of Masirah, just south of the Hormuz entry point to the Gulf of Oman from the Arabian Sea.
Western military sources familiar with the American buildup on the two strategic islands tell DEBKA-Net-Weekly that… they are witnessing the heaviest American concentration of might in the region since the US invaded Iraq in 2003...
US air transports are described as making almost daily landings on Socotra and Masirah… The US military presence in the region will further expand in the first week of March when three US aircraft carriers and their strike groups plus a French carrier arrive in the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea… A fourth US carrier will be standing by in the Pacific Ocean, a few days’ sailing time from the water off Iran’s coast.
LIKE SADDAM HUSSEIN BEFORE THEM, IRAN’S LEADERSHIP IS ATTEMPTING TO TRADE THEIR OIL WITHOUT GOING THROUGH THE PROPER CHANNELS – IN ESSENCE ATTEMPTING TO BYPASS THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE BY STRIKING DEALS WITH CHINA, INDIA, AND RUSSIA THAT WILL NOT REQUIRE THE EXCHANGE OF OIL FOR US DOLLARS, BUT RATHER, YUAN, RUPEES AND GOLD.
It may very well be that NUCLEAR WEAPONS, LIKE WMD IN IRAQ, ARE SIMPLY THE PRETEXT, RATHER THAN THE REAL REASON, THAT WILL BE USED TO CRUSH THOSE WHO OPPOSE THE FINANCIERS, POLITICIANS AND INFLUENCERS BEHIND THE NEW WORLD ORDER PARADIGM.
Make no mistake: this is serious business. THEY WILL KILL AS MANY AS IS NEEDED (ON OUR SIDE AND THEIRS) IN ORDER TO PUSH THE AGENDA FORWARD.
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU MESS WITH THE MEN."
"ISRAEL HAS SET UP A SPECIALIST COMMANDO UNIT DESIGNED TO CARRY OUT MISSIONS DEEP INSIDE ENEMY TERRITORY amid growing consensus in government circles that MILITARY STRIKES MUST BE CONTEMPLATED IF ECONOMIC SANCTIONS DO NOT HALT IRAN'S NUCLEAR PROGRAMME.On 4 February 2012, Mark Duell and Hugo Gye reported thus in The Mail online:
The ‘Depth Corps’ has been organised with the aim of co-ordinating deep penetration operations in other countries at a time when the defence ministry acknowledges that THE NUMBER OF COVERT ISRAELI OPERATIONS ABROAD HAS INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY IN THE LAST YEAR...
The Tehran regime has repeatedly claimed that Israeli, US and British agents are responsible for the assassination of six scientists involved in the country's nuclear programme…
‘Of course I see about the killings in the media. I see it happens,’ said Dan Meridor, the Minister for Intelligence and Nuclear Affairs… ‘The fact that they continue to work on this programme despite sanctions means they want to get nuclear and are prepared to pay a heavy price… Pressure is important here, to leave them in a state where they are on the threshold of getting nuclear weapons would be a mistake,’ he said…
Israeli officials say that any military action must take place by the end of summer to prevent Iran moving more of its nuclear capabilities underground. They also point out that the Western powers which have imposed them are now fully aware of the dangers posed by the regime. Yesterday in Washington, James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, told a Congressional panel that Iran may launch terrorist attacks in response to a perceived threat.”
"Fears of a global nuclear war breaking out were today stoked after Israel suggested Iran has been developing missiles with an extraordinary range of 6,200 miles - enough to reach the U.S.
An international political storm is now in full force as the U.S. desperately tries to talk Israel out of an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities amidst fears a strike could now come within just two months.
Israel's deputy prime minister Moshe Ya'alon said the missiles were being tested at a site near Tehran that was destroyed three months ago and they were ‘aimed at America, not at us’.
Mr Ya'alon said Iran is creating ‘a nightmare for the free world’. Iran, which is accused of preparing to build a nuclear bomb, says it will retaliate over Western-backed oil sanctions and any attack threat.
The U.S. doesn’t believe Iran is producing such a long-range missile, but Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is still reportedly fearful of a growing chance Israel would attack Iran as early as April.
South-east Asia's most-wanted terrorist with $5m U.S. bounty on his head killed in Philippines air strike.
Britain to pull out troops from Afghanistan frontline role by the end of next year after surprise U.S. announcement on early war exit. Pull the other one! Iran's leader claims satellite launch 'will bring humans of the world closer together'
‘Threatening Iran and attacking Iran will harm America,’ Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned in a defiant speech on Friday.
‘Sanctions will not have any impact on ‘our determination to continue our nuclear course’ and it will impose any threats ‘at the right time’, he added.
‘I have no fear of saying that we will back and help any nation or group that wants to confront and fight against the Zionist regime (Israel).’
America is leaning heavily on Israel, even though it has largely concluded that outside argument will have little effect on Israeli decision-making.
Warning: Israel's deputy prime minister Moshe Ya'alon suggested Iran is developing missiles with an extraordinary range of 6,200 miles - enough to reach the U.S.
'In light of the realisation of the divine promise by almighty God, the Zionists and the Great Satan (America) will soon be defeated,' Mr Khamenei added, reported World Net Daily."
"What really hit me and forced me to take this decision was the fact the much-vaunted Anglo-Saxon sense of justice, as they are the first to claim that everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
In Terry's case, they gravely offended me and damaged my authority at the head of the England side, effectively creating a problem for the squad.
I have never tolerated certain crossing of lines, so it was easy for me to spot it and take my decision to leave."
'Innocent until proven guilty,' Fabio? Not any more, my son. Not where the made up crime of 'racism' is concerned. Especially when those who foist those laws upon us have the power to exercise them.
David Bernstein is Jewish. As was his predecessor, Lord David Triesman.
Of the 8 individuals featured, four were black men, one was a black woman and the remaining three were young, white women.
There were no white men at all. At the bottom of the same page were told that the contents of the above page were: 'Promoted by David Triesman, General Secretary, the Labour Party.'
Triesman, who was a significant figure in the Euro-communist movement of the 1970s, was ennobled by Tony Blair and made Baron Triesman in January 2004. During the course of Gulf War II, Blair saw to it that unelected, former Communist became an Under Secretary in the Foreign Office.
On 6 February 2012, Andrew Pierce said this in The Mail Online:
"The pariah Fred Goodwin has at last been stripped of his knighthood, but still there is no action against the liars and cheats sitting in the House of Lords. Take Baroness Uddin, Britain’s first Muslim woman peer. SHE HAS NOT FACED CRIMINAL CHARGES EVEN THOUGH SHE WAS SUSPENDED FROM THE UPPER HOUSE FOR A RECORD 18 MONTHS AFTER FRAUDULENTLY ABUSING HER PARLIAMENTARY SECOND HOME ALLOWANCE TO THE TUNE OF £125,000.It’s scandalous that they let her in in the first place. Along with God knows how many other gimme-gimme-gimme immigrant chancers.
SHE HAS NOT REPAID A PENNY AND KEEPS HER TITLE. As if that’s not bad enough, I hear SHE IS STILL LIVING IN A THREE-BEDROOM HOUSING ASSOCIATION PROPERTY IN TOWER HAMLETS, East London, paying taxpayer-subsidised rent of just £124 a week.
Uddin, who has held highly-paid directorships on companies such as Carlton Television, claims she can’t afford to repay the £125,000 even though SHE OWNS THREE PROPERTIES WITH HER HUSBAND.
Not only did Uddin claim more than £100,000 between 2005 and 2010 by stating her main residence was a small flat in Maidstone, Kent, when in fact it was her Tower Hamlets property, managed by Spitalfields Housing Association, she also claimed mileage to Kent even though NEIGHBOURS SAID THE FLAT HAD NEVER BEEN OCCUPIED.
Spitalfields Housing Association, which gets more than £35?million from the taxpayer, provides rents as low as ONE-SIXTH OF THE MARKET RATE. THE BOROUGH HAS 23,000 PEOPLE ON ITS HOUSING WAITING LIST.
Legally, a tenant with an assured or secure tenancy must live in social housing as their ‘only or principal home’, so she could have breached her agreement. But because the tenancy is joint with her husband, THE HOUSING ASSOCIATION SAYS IT CAN’T (OR WON’T) EVICT HER. IT DIDN’T RETURN MY CALLS.
Peter Golds, the Tory group leader on Tower Hamlets Council, has written to Housing Minister Grant Shapps demanding her eviction. ‘IT’S SCANDALOUS THAT A STATE-FUNDED HOUSING ASSOCIATION HAS NOT KICKED HER OUT,’ he said.’
I couldn’t agree more.”
On 7 February 2012, The Mail Online reported thus:
“Nicolas Sarkozy has been promising to cut back on his presidential spending, but he’s actually splashing out £10,000 A DAY ON FOOD AND KEEPS 121 CARS UNDER THE ELYSEE PALACE, according to a new book.On 10 February 2012, after the billionaire financier Nathaniel Rothschild, lost a High Court libel action brought against The Daily Mail over a claim that he was the ‘puppet master’ behind a deal involving Lord Mandelson and Russian oligarch, Oleg Deripaska, The Telegraph quoted Mr Justice Tugendhat as saying that Rothschild's conduct had been ‘inappropriate in a number of respects.’ He added:
Socialist MP Rene Dosiere, in L'argent de l'État (Money from the State), sets out what he sees as extraordinary excesses by the French President. In the explosive book, he accuses Sarkozy of ‘ignoring the most elementary principles of the separation between private and public accounts’…
His fleet of cars is double the size of predecessor Jacques Chirac’s and cost, annually, £100,000 to insure and a whopping £275,000 to fuel. He uses an Airbus A330 – dubbed Air Sarko One - that drained the public purse of £215million to kit out, is accompanied by a delegation of 300 people on trips abroad and travels more often that previous presidents, claims Dosiere.
Recent excursions include an 80-mile trip to Saint-Quentin, from Paris, that cost £350,000, a £109,000 sortie to the Lascaux caves with Bruni and a two-and-a-half-hour trip to Ain that Dosiere worked out cost £700 a minute…
The French people also chip in for a thousand pounds worth of daily newspapers and Sarkozy’s ‘house’ wine, the red option being a £160 bottle of Crozes-Hermitage, which guests use to wash down foods such as lobster carpaccio and calves cheeks.
His total annual expenditure comes to £95million.”
"In my judgment that conduct foreseeably brought Lord Mandelson's public office and personal integrity into disrepute and exposed him to accusations of conflict of interest, and it gave rise to the reasonable grounds to suspect that LORD MANDELSON HAD ENGAGED IN IMPROPER DISCUSSIONS WITH MR DERIPASKA ABOUT ALUMINIUM…Banya? Never heard it called that before. Must be an Illuminati thing.
Mr Rothschild states that he took Lord Mandelson on the trip as a friend and not for any other business reason. I cannot accept that the position was as simple as that... I do not accept that there is a clear line between the business and the personal sides of Mr Rothschild's relationship with Mr Deripaska. They have very extensive business relationships.
In a written judgment, Mr Justice Tugendhat noted that Mr Rothschild was ‘clearly not comfortable’ when cross examined about whether or not Lord Mandelson had been aware that he would be staying with Mr Deripaska, visiting an aluminium plant and flying in Mr Deripaska's jet. He said it was ‘clear’ that that the visit to Siberia had ‘always been a business trip’ so far as Mr Rothschild was concerned, and criticised the financier for giving ‘quite unrealistic’ answers to certain questions…
Tugendhat said there were ‘at the very least’ reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Deripaska's interest in providing Lord Mandelson such ‘luxurious and generous’ hospitality was because he had trade and business responsibilities. He said that Mr Rothschild's differing accounts of the reasons for the visit to the plant were 'confusing’ and found that the banker had 'not been entirely candid’ throughout the different stages of the case...
Rothschild, who was not present, said in a statement that he intended to appeal. ‘I am disappointed with today's ruling, although I do not regret bringing the action… I brought this action seeking an apology for the Daily Mail's utterly false claim that I had arranged for Lord Mandelson to attend a dinner in Moscow to close a deal between Alcoa and Rusal and that this had caused the loss of 300 British jobs…
Lord Mandelson's trip to Russia was entirely recreational’…
It emerged during last month's hearing that during the visit to Siberia, in January 2005, THE MEN HAD VISITED A SAUNA WHERE THEY WERE THRASHED WITH BIRCH LEAVES AND PLUNGED INTO AN ICE BATH TOGETHER.
Mr Rothschild described the experience as ‘incredibly enjoyable’… He told the court: ‘WE WERE BEATEN BY A 25-YEAR-OLD BANYA KEEPER MAN, WHO HAS SPENT HIS LIFE PERFECTING THE ART OF BANYA'."
"Then we jumped into ice-cold water. Everyone woke up the next day feeling revitalised and excited about the day’….
Mr Rothschild said the former Labour minister's presence was ‘PURELY RECREATIONAL.’
The Daily Mail article claimed that Mr Rothschild acted like a ‘puppet master,’ inviting Lord Mandelson to a dinner in Moscow to ‘impress’ Mr Deripaska, who was in the process of signing the £500 million deal with America's biggest aluminium company, Alcoa. It was alleged that LORD MANDELSON'S PRESENCE WAS REQUIRED TO ASSURE BOTH PARTIES THAT EU ALUMINIUM IMPORT TARIFFS WOULD NOT RISE IN THE NEAR FUTURE.
During the hearing, Lord Feldman, co-chairman of the Conservative Party, accused Mr Rothschild of trying to arrange a donation to the party from Mr Deripaska in 2008.
However, his version of events contradicted that of Mr Rothschild, who, in a letter to The Times in October 2008, claimed it was Lord Feldman who raised the possibility of Mr Deripaska channelling a donation to the Conservatives through one of his British companies.”
Rothchild, Deripaska and Feldman are Jewish. Mandelson’s father was a Jew. He is also gay. By the sounds of the ‘purely recreational… thrashed with birch leaves and… beaten by a 25-year-old banya keeper man’… one wonders whether Mr Rothschild might not be averse to the odd spot of todger twiddling, as well.
On 12 February 2012, ynetnews.com, an online Jewish news resource, informed us thus:
"Some two years after the assassination of senior Hamas operative Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai, MOSSAD AGENTS ARE STILL USING FOREIGN PASSPORTS, INCLUDING THOSE OF BRITISH NATIONALS, while conducting covert intelligence operations overseas."Councillor Sarah Bevan (Lib Dem, Peasedown) was incensed when opposition Tories blocked the allocation of £1.8 million for the development of new gypsy and traveller sites. She was subsequently quoted thus on 16 February 2012 at the This is Somerset website:
“If the Conservative group… believes that those who hold the purse strings should prioritise potholes over people, some of whom may well be members of minority groups such as the Romany, it is swerving perilously close to the kind of low level, INSIDIOUS RACISM THAT ULTIMATELY LED TO THE HOLOCAUST.”Bevan is Jewish. A Jew playing the ‘Holocaust’ card. Again. In hopes that £1.8 million of Somerset taxpayer cash be spent on improving the living quarters of those whom the majority of Somerset taxpayers would not want living alongside them.
I reckon most Somerset folk would be happy if the Gypsies went elsewhere. I reckon they’d be ecstatic if Bevan went the same way.
On 17 February 2012, Rachel Shabi said this in The Guardian:
"The rush to throw charges of antisemitism at people who criticise Israel (is) meant to intimidate and paralyse, choke and divert the discussion over Israel's occupation and policies in the Middle East. But for every person silenced, there are growing numbers who, surveying the quality of the argument, will dismiss the pro-right Israel lobby solely on the basis of the bullying.On 23 Feb 2012, former MP and Lib Dem peer, Lady Tonge, said this at Middlesex University:
It isn't just the nature of the bashing, but its compulsive frequency, especially when set against the paucity of actual arguments presented."
"Beware Israel… Israel is not going to be there for ever in its present form. One day, the United States of America will get sick of giving £70BN A YEAR TO ISRAEL to support what I call America's aircraft carrier in the Middle East – that is Israel. One day, the American people are going to say to the Israel lobby in the USA: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. Israel will lose support and THEN THEY WILL REAP WHAT THEY HAVE SOWN."Oh, the politicians are catching up alright. At least, the odd honest one is.
When the usual suspects arose in uproar at her remarks, Lady Tonge explained that they were made during a 'very ill-tempered meeting in which Zionist campaigners attempted continually to disrupt proceedings.' She continued:
"They mouthed obscenities at the panelists, to the extent that university security attempted to remove them from the premises. The comments I made were in protest at the treatment of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank and the treatment of Israeli Arabs."She also said this:
"I am disappointed the leadership of my party did not consult me before issuing a press release and seems always TO ABET THE REQUEST OF THE PRO-ISRAEL LOBBY. ISRAEL IS ACTING AGAINST INTERNATIONAL LAW, THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS. THEY DO THIS WITH IMPUNITY and if our political parties will not take action then individuals must."
Nick Clegg, the leader of the Lib Dems, responded thus:
"These remarks were wrong and offensive and do not reflect the values of the Liberal Democrats. I asked Baroness Tonge to withdraw her remarks and apologise for the offence she has caused. She has refused to do so and will now be leaving the party."
The Chief Rabbi, Lord Sacks, added:
"I am appalled at Baroness Tonge's remarks. They are dangerous, inflammatory and unacceptable. I commend Nick Clegg for his decisive action. Views such as those expressed by Baroness Tonge have no place in civil public discourse."On 26 February 2012, Kirsty Buchanan informed us thus in The Sunday Express:
“SCHOOLS WILL BE FORCED TO TEACH CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS FIVE THE IMPORTANCE OF GAY MARRIAGE.#Lynne Featherstone is Jewish.
Teachers who refuse because of their religious beliefs could face disciplinary action.
Ministers are pushing ahead with a legal overhaul of the definition of marriage.
Campaigners against the Coalition Government’s plans warn it will put classrooms on the frontline of a political correctness war and parents who object to the teaching of same-sex marriage could be classed as bigots.
The Government will next month publish its consultation on giving same-sex marriage the same legal definition as traditional marriage. It is the first step towards a Gay Marriage Bill… Peter Bone, Tory MP for Wellingborough, warned:
‘If marriage is redefined, schools will have no choice but to give children equivalent teaching on same-sex marriage, even those of a very young age. Parents who object will be treated as bigots and outcasts. And what of the teachers who object to teaching about same sex marriage. Will they face disciplinary action?’…
The Coalition for Marriage, which includes bishops, politicians and lawyers, warns GAY RIGHTS ARE BEING CHAMPIONED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE RIGHTS OF CHRISTIANS AND OTHER FAITHS. They collected 36,000 signatures against the change.
However, Equalities Minister Lynne Featherstone yesterday told the Church it was up to the nation, not religious institutions, to decide who could marry. She said: ‘This is not a battle between gay rights and religious beliefs. This is about the principles of family, society and personal freedoms’.”
On 28 February 2012, after James Chapman told us that ‘proposals for sweeping new powers... would allow the Government to withhold any evidence it deems sensitive from an open civil court,' Lord Macdonald, QC, was quoted thus:
“These unprecedented proposals are an audacious attack on the fundamental principle of British justice... They threaten to put THE GOVERNMENT ABOVE THE LAW, WHILE LEAVING ORDINARY CITIZENS… SHUT OUT OF THEIR OWN JUSTICE SYSTEM. After a decade in which we have seen our politicians and officials caught up in the woeful abuses of the war on terror, the last thing the Government should be seeking is to sweep all of this under the carpet. However, THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THEIR DISASTROUS SECRET JUSTICE PROPOSALS ARE LIKELY TO DO.Chapman added:
We cannot afford to sleepwalk into a system of secret courts. David Cameron came to power saying ‘sunlight is the best disinfectant.’ WE SHOULD NOT SACRIFICE BRITAIN’S OPEN AND TRANSPARENT JUSTICE SYSTEM SIMPLY TO PROTECT POLITICIANS AND THEIR OFFICIALS FROM EMBARRASSMENT.”
“The reforms, detailed in a Green Paper on justice and security, are backed by senior figures in the security community, notably Sir Malcolm Rifkind, chairman of the parliamentary intelligence and security committee.”Rifkind is Jewish.
On 29 February 2012, the Jewish news site, ynet , reported thus:
"IRAN'S CITIZENS SHOULD BE STARVED IN ORDER TO CURB TEHRAN'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM, officials in Jerusalem said Wednesday ahead of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's upcoming trip to Washington.Starve 'em out. Good old siege tactic from the middle ages. Yeah. Let's starve those low-life, subhumans out!
‘North Korea is halting its nuclear program in order to receive aid in food, and THIS IS WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH IRAN AS WELL,’ one unnamed official said.
‘Suffocating sanctions could lead to a grave economic situation in Iran and to a shortage of food,’ the source said. ‘This would force the regime to consider whether the nuclear adventure is worthwhile, WHILE THE PERSIAN PEOPLE HAVE NOTHING TO EAT AND MAY RISE UP AS WAS THE CASE IN SYRIA, TUNISIA AND OTHER ARAB STATES.
THE WESTERN WORLD LED BY THE UNITED STATES MUST IMPLEMENT STIFLING SANCTIONS at this time already, rather than wait or hesitate,’ the official said. ‘IN ORDER TO SUFFOCATE IRAN ECONOMICALLY AND DIPLOMATICALLY AND LEAD THE REGIME THERE TO A HOPELESS SITUATION, THIS MUST BE DONE NOW, without delay’.”
Know what you mean, O Israel!
On 29 February 2012, an unidentified Lib Dem spokesman was reported as having said this by The Guardian:
"Jenny Tonge does not speak for the party on Israel and Palestine. Her presence and comments at this event were extremely ill-advised and ill-judged. The tone of the debate at this event was wholly unacceptable."The Liberal Democrats Friends of Israel group was quoted thus in the same newspaper:
"LDFI applaud Nick Clegg's decisive action in sacking Baroness Jenny Tonge. Nick rightly gave Jenny Tonge the chance to apologise and retract her recent statement on Israel and she declined. The rest is history. I hope this now draws a line under the continual smearing of Lib Dem party policy on Israel and the Middle East by former Lib Dem Baroness Tonge. I'm pleased to say she is now somebody else's problem."The Board of Deputies of British Jews issued this statement:
"Given her longstanding, pernicious views on Israel, her comment that Israel 'is not going to be there forever' is both sinister and abhorrent. THERE IS NO PLACE FOR SOMEONE LIKE JENNY TONGE IN MAINSTREAM POLITICAL PARTIES IN THIS COUNTRY."John Woodcock MP, the chairman of Labour Friends of Israel, said:
"This is the latest in a series of outrageous remarks from Baroness Tonge – words of excuse or apology in response are no longer enough."What would be 'enough,' John? A firing Squad? The rope? A cauldron full of boiling oil? Or just seven long years in clink for ‘incitement to racial hatred?’
Leon Brittan was the Home Secretary when the bill that upped the ante to two years in prison for ’incitement to racial hatred’ was first proposed. His parents were Jewish immigrants. Jack Straw, who describes himself as ‘a third-gereneration Jewish immigrant,’ was Home Secretary when another raft of race law saw the maximum penalty for this thought crime raised to SEVEN years!
The machinations of the Board of British Deputies and Lord Anthony Lester was key in the creation of the voluminous body of British race law. Lester, who is Jewish also, suggested and wrote up much of the law himself and advised all shades of government as to how it might be implemented.
On 17 December 1998, just after Jack Straw seven-year intervention, the Board of Deputies of British Jews issued the following triumphal communiqué:
"The Board has been at the forefront of the development of proposals for race relations legislation in the UK… The Defence Policy and Group Relations Division, which monitors the activities of political extremists and racists, has urged successive governments to enact and strengthen race relations legislation… It has also sought allies and made common cause with other religious and minority groups.And the Home Secretary who introduced the very first race law in 1965? Frank Soskice was also an immigrant. I am as sure as I can be that the bloke who arrived here as a 16-year-old Russian refugee had Jewish blood close up in his pedigree as well.
THE BOARD PLAYED A FUNDAMENTAL PART IN URGING UPON GOVERNMENT THE FIRST RACE RELATIONS ACT WHICH WAS BASED, IN PART, ON REPORTS PREPARED FOR THE BOARD BY PROFESSOR GEOFFREY BINDMAN AND LORD LESTER OF HERNE HILL. Subsequently the Board has provided written and oral evidence to enquiries which preceded the passage of the Public Order Act 1986, the Criminal Justice Act 1994 and the Crime and Disorder Act 1998...
We regard the proposals of the Commission for Racial Equality for legislative change to be well thought out and substantiated… We are pleased to welcome and endorse the CRE’s published proposals. In particular we draw attention to proposed 1B, which recommends that the Race Relations Act should apply to all aspects of the activities of Government and all Public Bodies. We would support the extension of the RRA to all government and public bodies. These organisations play a leading role in forming public opinion on social issues…
The Board can also see the case for new legislation to combat discrimination and incitement on religious grounds… We are also shortly to respond to the Government’s request that it might consider introducing specific legislation to outlaw Holocaust Denial…
In addition to changes in the main body of national law, changes are needed in the rules and regulations of many institutions and organisations."
When those for whom there is ’no place… in mainstream political party’ tell a truth the establishment doesn’t want told, the bought-and-paid-for lash out. Which, as it happens, isn’t the worst thing in the world. Seeing as how it makes good and evil really easy to spot.
On 29 February 2012, former Cabinet Minister, Ann Widdecombe, opined thus in The Daily Express:
"When Lynne Featherstone, the Lib Dem Minister for Equality, challenged the Church, claiming it did not own marriage, she was effectively suggesting the major source of opposition to coalition plans for gay marriage is religious.Over the last fifty years or so, you politicians foist a ton of ‘big’ stuff on ’the people’ they didn’t want, Ann. How come your on the side of the 86 per cent’ now? Now you’re no longer a politican?
And, while claiming the debate was not between religious belief and gay rights, she was in reality trying to create just that impression. It would suit ministers to paint a picture in which everyone wants gay marriage except the Church.
It is an old ploy. When the abortion debate was raging in the late Eighties TV programmes regularly put on debates between pro-abortion doctors and pro-life politicians. Offers of pro-life doctors were regularly refused because THE MEDIA AGENDA WAS TO SUGGEST THE MEDICAL PROFESSION WAS IN FAVOUR OF WIDER ABORTION AND THAT IT WAS ONLY POLITICIANS WHO WERE AGAINST IT.
The same phenomenon is apparent when euthanasia is debated: it is nearly always a politician versus a terminally ill person demanding the right to die, even though terminally ill people taking the opposite view are offered to the programme producers. The impression they want to create is that politicians are standing in the way of merciful solutions…
I have no doubt that as gay marriage is debated we shall see bishops deployed against gay activists but it is simply not true that only the Church is opposed to redefining marriage. An opinion poll, independently carried out for the Coalition for Marriage, suggests 86 PER CENT OF THE POPULATION BELIEVES IT PERFECTLY POSSIBLE TO PROMOTE GAY RIGHTS WITHOUT REDEFINING MARRIAGE.
So if, as Ms Featherstone claims, marriage is owned by the people maybe she should start listening to the people’s voice. I know gays who oppose this measure, as does Christopher Biggins, and one can hardly call them homophobic. People who never go inside a church from one year to the next oppose it.
Some of those who spoke out in favour of civil partnerships oppose it. Writers on Left-wing newspapers oppose it. So as this is the most fundamental change to society in centuries, LET DAVID CAMERON ASK THE PEOPLE WHAT THEY WANT. If he insists on pushing ahead then I challenge him to hold a referendum. THE REDEFINITION OF MARRIAGE IS TOO BIG AN ISSUE FOR THE STATE TO FOIST ON AN UNWILLING POPULATION.”
On 1 March 2012, Arthur Jones, a Republican Congressional candidate running in the forthcoming Illinois primary, was quoted thus in The Mail Online:
“As far as I’m concerned, the Holocaust is nothing more than an international extortion racket by the Jews… It’s the blackest lie in history. Millions of dollars are being made by Jews telling this tale of woe and misfortune in books, movies, plays and TV. The more survivors, the more lies that are told…On 2 March 2012, Margaret Hodge, MP for Barking, and Chairperson of the Commons Public Accounts Committee, appeared on BBC Radio 4’s Any Questions?
These war-mongering fools in congress like Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney, we can’t let Iran have one nuclear weapon but we let Israel have all the nuclear weapons they want. This is ridiculous…
Our country is falling apart economically, politically, culturally, militarily… We are going down.”
At one point, Hodge interrupted a fellow panellist and asked:
“Are you suggesting that the riots last summer did not have legitimate causes?”Which implies that Hodge, herself, thinks the rioters had a case, does it not? She added:
“We all regret the damage that was caused but what you do have to understand is, the reason that young people were rioting across Britain was because they had lost hope in the future. In my own constituency, if you are among the one in four young people out of work and you are starting your life, you apply for endless jobs, you cannot afford to go to university, you may not have the right qualifications, then you lose a bit of hope.”'You lose a bit of hope.' So you riot. And steal. And destroy. And kill. And it’s understandable. According to the left-wing New Labour MP whom Tony Blair thought fit to make Children’s Minister in the last administration.
Margaret Hodge is an Egyptian Jew. Her maiden name is Oppenheimer.
On 6 March 2012, French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, said this on French TV:
“Our system of integration is getting worse and worse. We have too many foreigners on our territory and we can no longer manage to find them accommodation, a job, a school…Sarkozy said he also wanted to limit the amount of welfare benefits paid to immigrant workers so that only those had lived in the country for 10 years, and worked for at least five, received them.
Over the five year term, I think that to restart the process of integration in the right way, we must divide by two the number of people that we welcome, that is to say to pass from 180,000 per year to 100,000.”
The French Presidential Election is just two months away and Sarkozy is trailing badly in all the opinion polls. His Socialist rival, Francois Hollande, is predicted to finish eight points ahead of him in May. Thus, he goes the way Thatcher once did. 'We are being swamped,' she said, just before the 1979 election. Thirty two years later, at least five million more immigrants are living here than were doing so back then.
Along with their many children and grandchildren.
On 6 March 2012, The Economist described 'the American-Israeli relationship' as a 'sort of crazy co-dependency... doomed... stubborn and unstable... increasingly delusional and dangerous... disastrous... paranoid.' The magazine added:
"During his meeting with Barack Obama on Monday, Bibi Netanyahu said Israel 'must have the ability always to defend itself, by itself, against any threat. I believe that's why you appreciate, Mr. President, that Israel must reserve the right to defend itself,' Netanyahu said. 'After all, that's the very purpose of the Jewish state, to restore to the Jewish people control over our destiny. That's why my supreme responsibility as prime minister of Israel is to ensure that Israel remains master of its fate.'
News flash: Israel is not master of its fate. It's not terribly surprising that a country with less than 8m inhabitants is not master of its fate. Switzerland, Sweden, Serbia and Portugal are not masters of their fates. These days, many countries with populations of 100m or more can hardly be said to be masters of their fates. Britain and China aren't masters of their fates, and even the world's overwhelmingly largest economy, the United States, isn't really master of its fate.
But Israel has even less control over its own destiny than Portugal or Britain do. The main reason is that, unlike those countries, Israel refuses to give up its empire. Israel is unable to sustain its imperial ambitions in the West Bank, or even to articulate them coherently... For over a decade, the tone of Israeli politics has been a mix of panic, despair, hysteria and resignation.
No one bears greater responsibility for the trap Israel finds itself in today than Mr Netanyahu. As prime minister in the late 1990s, he did more than any other Israeli leader to destroy the peace process. Illegal land grabs by settlers were tolerated and quietly encouraged in the confused expectation that they would aid territorial negotiations.
Violent clashes and provocations erupted whenever the peace process seemed on the verge of concrete steps forward; the most charitable spin would be that the Israel is failed to exercise the restraint they might have shown in retaliating against Palestinian terrorism, had they been truly interested in progress towards a two-state solution...
Having trapped themselves in a death struggle with Palestinians that they cannot acknowledge or untangle, Israelis have psychologically displaced the source of their anxiety onto a more distant target: Iran. An Iranian nuclear bomb would not be a happy development for Israel. Neither was Pakistan's, nor indeed North Korea's. The notion that it represents a new Holocaust is overstated, and the belief that the source of Israel's existential woes can be eliminated with an airstrike is mistaken.
But Iran makes an appealing enemy for Israelis because, unlike the Palestinians, it can be fitted into a familiar ideological trope from the Jewish national playbook: the eliminationist anti-Semite."
News flash (2):
Jourmnalistic honesty regarding the overclose relationship of America and Israel now appears to be spittal-drenchedly mainstream.
News flash (3):
Unlike Israel, the white world IS the 'master of its fate.' It can still dismiss the racial suicide option insisted upon by the New World Order elite.
On 17 March 2012, Simon Walters told us this in The Mail Online:
“The male partners of peers and knights who take part in gay marriages may be given courtesy titles to put them on a par with wives of titled men. It could lead to Sir Elton John’s partner David Furnish being known as ‘Sir David’...
In a consultation document published last week, Home Secretary Theresa May and Equalities Minister Lynne Featherstone declared: ‘If commitment and marriage is a good thing, we should not restrict civil marriage only to opposite-sex couples’…
To ensure full equality, the Government will either have to grant courtesy titles to the partners of married gay peers and knights – or remove them from the wives of their heterosexual counterparts… To add to the complications, male spouses of female peers and dames are already discriminated against. They are not granted courtesy titles, and remain plain ‘Mr’…
Even if a courtesy title for gay partners were to be decided, there remains the question of which surname to use. Wives with courtesy titles have to use their husbands’ surnames, but gay couples often keep their own surnames. Then there is the issue of lesbian married couples, where one is a Baroness or dame."
'If commitment and marriage is a good thing, we should not restrict civil marriage only to opposite-sex couples.'A matter decided, at the highest level, by two women and the Prime Minister then. And you can be sure Dave's Lib Dem deputy did not raise any objections.
Lynne Feathestone is Jewish. David Cameron's great-great granddad was a Jewish immigrant who made a pile in banking. Nick Clegg is 75% foreigner.
As for Theresa May, well, I guess she's just one of the many bought-and-paid-for folk who think more of their onward slither up the greasy, political pole than they do of the wants and needs of the British majority.
THEY will never stop taking the p***, you know. THEY will carry on as they do until Whitey is completely neutered or disappeared altogether. In an uncertain world, that's one thing you can be one hundred per cent sure of.
On 20 March 2012, Jennifer Lipman reported thus in The Jewish Chronicle:
“Nearly half of Britons question loyalty of Jews... In 2009 only 37 per cent of British respondents deemed the suggestion that Jews were more loyal to Israel to be accurate, 48 per cent found it to be 'probably true' this year...The sheeple are waking up, it seems.
The 2012 survey showed that a fifth of Britons believed it was 'probably true' that 'Jews have too much power in the business world' and 22 per cent agreed that 'Jews have too much power in international financial markets.' Just 15 per cent of British respondents supported those statements when asked about them three years ago...
More British respondents this year than in 2009 – 24 per cent, up from 20 per cent - agreed that Jews 'still talk too much about what happened to them in the Holocaust'.”
On 23 March 2012, the Israel, the Church and the Middle East Crisis conference began at Biola University in California.
During this event, New York Times journalist and author, Joel Rosenberg, pointed out that, in Ezekiel 38, ‘Gog’ (of Gog and Magog fame - Vladimir Putin, according to Rosenberg and co.) would lead a coalition of nations in an attack on Israel, prompting God’s intervention.
Rosenberg then said this to the audience of 2,300:
"The question for the Israeli leadership is, ‘Have we tried everything short of war to stop Iran?… The stakes are, IF IRAN GETS ITS NUCLEAR WEAPONS, IT COULD DO IN SIX MINUTES WHAT IT TOOK ADOLPH HITLER SIX YEARS TO DO AND THAT’S TO KILL 6 MILLION JEWS… (Putin/Gog) could tell the Israelis, ‘If you launch an attack on Iran it will be regarded as an attack on the Russian Federation…Mitch Glaser, President of Chosen People Ministries, which sponsored the conference, said Ezekiel 36 and 37 predicted the rebirth of Israel and the return of Jews to their homeland, events that are precursors to the ‘war of Gog and Magog.’ He added:
THIS WILL BE A DAY OF GREAT JUDGMENT WHEN GOD TURNS HIS SUPERNATURAL FURY AGAINST THE ENEMIES OF ISRAEL… It will also be a day of great spiritual awakening… We’re not living in normal times… The things that are happening now have never happened in all of human history, but they are happening now…
We know IT’S GOING TO BE BAD IN THE LAST DAYS, all kinds of shaking. But we also know that God uses the shaking as a way to prepare people’s hearts to hear the gospel. Ezekiel 38 and 39 will be one of the most dramatic shakings in all of human history, and I’m not speaking metaphorically. There is going to be AN EARTHQUAKE AT THE EPICENTER IN ISRAEL THAT IS GOING TO AFFECT THE ENTIRE PLANET… We are moving dramatically toward the fulfillment of Ezekiel 38 and 39...
Jesus said, ‘No one knows the day or hour’… So we just have to stick with what Jesus said. THE POINT IS NOT WHEN. THE POINT IS ARE WE READY?"
"So now the stage is set. Israel is in the land and there is a lining up of powers against Israel. YOU’D HAVE TO BE BLIND NOT TO SEE THE SIGNS OF THE TIMES… It’s critical for us to see the end-times through the lens of scripture… Yeshua, Jesus Himself, told us to study the end-times. We don’t want to be ignorant of what God is doing in the last days."We don’t want to be ignorant of what folks like you are doing either, Mitch.
The nuts have been running the asylum for a long time now. The upshot of our allowing this, firstly, to happen and then, secondly, doing nothing to wrest control back from the loonies, is that they now have the power to bring on the end of the world.
Rosenberg and Glaser are Jewish.
On 30 April 2012, Melanie Philips said this in The Daily Mail:
“A High Court family judge, Sir Paul Coleridge, will launch a foundation to promote marriage and to warn of the catastrophic consequences of family breakdown.On 2 May 2012, Sefi Krupsky said this in the Israeli daily, Haaretz:
Britain is blighted by serial divorce and a corresponding erosion of marriage. In 2010, there were some 241,000 marriages in England and Wales, fewer than a century ago, and 120,000 divorces, up by almost 5 per cent on the previous year. This has gone hand in hand with a galloping increase in elective lone parenthood and cohabitation, whose own high rate of breakdown has poured petrol on to the flames of mass fatherlessness.
An appalling 3.8 million children are now caught up in the entrails of the family justice system, with as many as 320,000 new children each year being sucked in.
Sir Paul does not mince his words. As he so rightly says, family breakdown is the ‘scourge of society’.
Families do not recover from the fundamental shock it administers. Children dragged into such cases may never recover from the emotional upset, and the cost to society of clearing up the mess is calamitous. Yet as he also says, obtaining a divorce is ‘easier than getting a driving licence’…
How refreshing to hear someone in public life so robustly tell the un-PC truth like this… This is not, however, just a group of people who happen to be particularly knowledgeable about the effects of divorce. The courts and the legal world they represent are directly complicit in this disaster. Indeed, Sir Paul even likens his own profession to ‘cynical arms dealers’ making a living from weapons of family destruction…
For more than three decades, lawyers and judges have led the way in bringing about this seismic cultural shift by progressively liberalising the practice of family law…
The institutionally liberal Law Commission recommended one liberalising family measure after another, such as easier divorce, ending the stigma of illegitimacy or establishing equal rights for cohabitants, both gay and straight. At the same time, New Left thinking about radical and non-judgmental ‘lifestyle choice’ swept through the intelligentsia…
THE TRUTH BECAME NOT ONLY UNSAYABLE BUT UNKNOWABLE, AS GOVERNMENT RESEARCHERS AIRBRUSHED THE CATEGORY OF MARRIAGE OUT OF OFFICIAL STATISTICS, making it impossible to quantify the effects of different kinds of relationship.
ACADEMIC RESEARCHERS WHO TRIED TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT THE DEVASTATING EFFECTS OF DIVORCE ON CHILDREN FOUND THEMSELVES PROFESSIONALLY OSTRACISED AND AT RISK OF HAVING THEIR GRANT FUNDING CUT.
The actual damage to children from divorce and elective lone parenthood was further masked and minimised by other researchers, who were either consumed by guilt over their abandonment of their own children, or cravenly chose to go with the flow. Meanwhile, RESEARCH CARRIED OUT MAINLY IN THE U.S. WHICH PRODUCED OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF THE RELATIVE HARM DONE BY FAMILY BREAKDOWN IN VIRTUALLY EVERY AREA OF CHILDREN’S LIVES, WAS WICKEDLY BRUSHED ASIDE…
Thanks to the family-wrecking Lib Dems the Government hasn’t even managed to get off the starting blocks in supporting marriage through the tax system. Too many who should have known better have simply sold the pass on the toll of childhood misery and social harm inflicted by family breakdown.”
"Israel's military launched a new system this week to monitor information on the Internet, the chief military censor said on Tuesday. Col. Sima Vaknin-Gil said that the new system will monitor visual and textual information on social networks such as Facebook and Twitter, on blogs and on traditional news sites...On 6 May 2012, Ian Birrell said this The Daily Mail:
Vaknin-Gil said that ‘the censor is perceived as a body trying to control the Internet, to no avail. This is mistake, we try to operate within the Internet only in terms of elements related to us’."
"So the French have got their wish: they have evicted the brash, egotistical and hyperactive President Bling-Bling from the Elysee Palace after just one term, along with his disliked Italian supermodel spouse. Few will mourn the departure of a man who promised so much but delivered so little with his strutting cockiness and super-rich friends.Sarkozy is Jewish.
Nicolas Sarkozy made the right moves politically on the road to the presidency. But then came so many wrong moves in office, starting on the night of his election triumph when he celebrated with rich supporters at one of Paris’s most expensive restaurants before jetting off to continue partying on the big yacht of a billionaire businessman...
He gave himself a 140 per cent pay rise, taking his annual salary above £300,000, then used state funds for late payment fines on his utility bills and £660 a day on fresh flowers. He reduced taxes on the rich, which backfired when financial meltdown struck a year into his term.
He spent £240million kitting out a new presidential plane, complete with £1million soundproofed doors on a luxurious double bedroom and £60,000 bread ovens to ensure fresh-baked baguettes. Then he became embroiled in a series of financial scandals, including claims he took illegal donations from the elderly heiress to the L’Oreal fortune.
Together with his third wife, model turned pop star Carla Bruni, the couple became fixtures in the celebrity magazines... Even Mr Sarkozy’s elderly father – a Hungarian aristocrat who fled the Nazis – got in on the act, publishing a memoir in which he described himself as a sex addict, starting at the age of 11 when he seduced his nanny.
Then there were pictures of the president checking his Blackberry during an audience with the Pope...
‘His behaviour is vulgar, I’m afraid,’ said former defence minister Alain Richard. ‘He has lost millions of older and conservative voters with his bad manners. They just do not think it is presidential behaviour.’
During the campaign Mr Sarkozy apologised for his actions. But there was derision when his wife, who earned nearly £5million a year at the height of her modelling career, insisted they were modest folk who just liked watching soap operas.
The campaign culminated with another controversial meal when Mr Sarkozy joined 50 guests at a fund-raising lunch of quails’ eggs and blue lobster in Paris’s most expensive hotel. Afterwards, he was caught on camera slipping off his £50,000 gold watch, a present from his wife...
His own house went to pay alimony on his two previous marriages, so the couple are expected to move to Carla’s mansion by the Bois de Boulogne (although there is also her huge summer house on the Riviera)...
Dazed by celebrity and dazzled by money, ended up alienating his people so much that yesterday he met his inevitable Waterloo."
On 7 May 2012, israelnationalnews.com told us this:
“In a letter to the Attorney General and to the State Attorney Sunday, Defense Minister Ehud Barak accused former Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. (res.) Gabi Ashkenazi of receiving and giving bribes, reports news website News1...Barak said:
According to News1, Barak listed no less than 10 criminal offenses that Ashkenazi had carried out, including acceptance of a bribe, giving a bribe and abetting bribery, while his confidante, Lt. Col. Boaz Harpaz, interfered in the appointments of senior officers.”
“After reading the draft of the State Comptroller's report on the Harpaz documents case one reaches grave and serious conclusions about the former Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi and his former aide, Col. Erez Viener.”On 10 May 2012, a BBC World Service poll told us this:
"Evaluations of Israel’s influence in the world, already largely unfavourable in 2011, have worsened in 2012. On average, in the 22 tracking countries surveyed both in 2011 and 2012, 50 per cent of respondents have negative views of Israel’s influence in the world, an increase of three points from 2011...On 16 May 2012, The Washington Post quoted Moshe Kantor, President of the European Jewish Congress, thus:
Out of 22 countries polled in 2011, 17 lean negative, three lean positive, and two are divided.
In the Western countries surveyed, views of Israel show improvement only in the US.. . Apart from the US, the most favourable views of Israel are found in Nigeria and Kenya…
In the EU countries surveyed, views of Israeli influence have hardened in Spain (74% negative ratings, up 8 points) and in France (65%, up 9 points)—while positive ratings remain low and steady. Negative ratings from the Germans and the British remain very high and stable (69% and 68%, respectively).
In other Anglo-Saxon countries, views have worsened in Australia (65% negative ratings, up 7 points) and in Canada (59%, up 7 points)…
Negative attitudes have also increased among the Chinese, the Indians, and the Russians…
For those who held negative views of Israel influence in the world, the foreign policy of the Israeli State is by some distance the main reason explaining their negative rating (45%). The way Israel treats its own people stands out as the second most important reason (27%).”
“Before calling on European leaders to act against hate on the street, they must clear their own house and that means BANNING AND OSTRACIZING ANY POLITICIANS AND POLITICAL PARTIES THAT PREACH HATE AND VIOLENCE. While we highly value freedom of speech, we all recognize that there must be restrictions and the visceral hatred propagated by the Golden Dawn is surely outside the boundaries of appropriate political discourse.The Post added:
WE HAVE TO BE PROACTIVE… That’s why we’re here.”
“A major European Jewish organization is urging European governments to quickly adopt measures to tackle anti-Semitism and far-right extremism, including possibly BANNING A HARDLINE GREEK PARTY THAT DID UNUSUALLY WELL IN RECENT ELECTIONS.Democracy, eh? Democracy as long as it suit’s the Jew. Then it’s ban and ostracize.
Moshe Kantor, President of the European Jewish Congress, was meeting with Czech Prime Minister Petr Necas on Wednesday to seek his support for ‘emergency measures’ to protect the continent’s Jewish communities from violent hate crimes. Kantor would not give details of the measures that his organization plans to propose, but they could involve passing legislation, sharing intelligence, and a public awareness campaign about anti-Semitic threats.
In particular, Kantor expressed concern about Golden Dawn, a party that did well during Greece’s May 6 election and whose leader claimed that Nazi concentration camps did not use ovens and gas chambers to kill prisoners during the Holocaust.
Kantor plans to meet with EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, and the congress consulted with Francois Hollande a few weeks before he was elected president of France.
The Czech Republic is one of Israel’s strongest allies in the European Union. The Czech government pushed for closer ties between the EU and Israel when it held the 27-nation bloc’s rotating presidency last year…
A recent report on anti-Semitism said the number of attacks in Europe declined in 2011.”
I entered this comment under the article:
"'Before calling on European leaders to act against hate on the street, they must clear their own house and that means banning and ostracizing any politicians and political parties that preach hate and violence.'On 17 May 2012, Dr. Rafael Medoff, author of 'Herbert Hoover and the Jews: The Origins of the ‘Jewish Vote’ and Bipartisan Support for Israel', was interviewed by Matt Lewis for ftrradio.com During the programme he said this:
'Hate on the street'? What about the 'hate on the street' directed at Whitey by the immigrant, Moshe? What about the 'hate' in the banker's boardrooms that created this latest world-wide recession? What about hateful anti-White propaganda in the mainsteam media? What about the evil that is political correctness? Chutzpah is one thing, Moshe. Genocide is another.
The powers-that-be thought they could subdue us in the lands that our fathers made and, for a while there, they were right. But, unless and until they get rid of us altogether, there will always be brave men and women willing to fight back against the malign creed and rule of the supremacists. Has the habitual dominance of these people rendered tham so stupid that they're not able to see what would happen if the Jew was seen to ban a democratically formed and elected, pro-indigenous party in Europe?
You've gotten way too big for your boots over the course of this last cosmetically Judaeophilic century, Moshe. You would be well advised to back off for a bit. Your media, financial and political power has tipped the balance until now but, if you try to 'ban and ostracize' those democrats who oppose you for simply exerting their democratic will, you will, I'm sure, reap the whirlwind."
“We know from the internal White House memos, correspondence and other documents that the primary reason Truman decided to recognise Israel over the objections of the State department was his fear that large number of Jews might vote republican in 1948...Those that inhabit the uppermost layers of the jungle canopy are monsters. They will change the world for a vote. They will do great evil just to gain and keep power. The nastily insignificant little man, Harry Truman, was one such monster.
Truman knew that the 1948 election was going to be close. He knew by the Spring of 1948 that his opponent was almost certainly going to be the governor of New York, Thomas Dewey. That meant that New York, a very important state, (which) in those days had the largest number of electoral votes, 47, New York could be in play and the Jewish vote in NY would be very significant. Even in those days the Jewish vote in NY was 10% or more of the electorate...
So pure election year politics were a major role is shaping America's early policy.”
On 18 May 2012, this was said in David Silverstein’s influential blog, Tikun Olam:
"Stand With Us and Tritons for Israel presented 'Rescuing Human Rights' on Wednesday evening May 15th at the University of California San Diego…On 18 May 2012, Marc Tracy said this in The Tablet, ‘a new read on Jewish life.’
The evening began with a harangue by the moderator about the many instances of human rights violations worldwide that are not reported or investigated by certain human rights agencies, including the UN…
He went on to distinguish between ‘real’ human rights abuses and the human rights issues in Israel, though the distinction was lost on me…
Ms. Goldstein offered a vivid description of the abuse of children by Islamists, teaching children the glory of martyrdom and stuffing them into suicide belts… She asked why the human rights agencies aren’t focused on these abuses.
The arguments made, the ideas broached, seem almost inconceivable to me given the sponsorship of the meeting by the State of Israel. And that is the point: Israel would love to change the nature of the human rights discourse, and the evening was indeed devoted to that purpose. Yet, how can a State so utterly deficient on the subject, suddenly come to sponsor human rights events? It is a brazen concept, even insulting...
Ms. Goldstein, however, was particularly smug and self-righteous in her condemnations of the Islamist abuse of children as suicide bombers, human shields, and warriors. Here, too, the bubble is easily popped: During Q & A, I asked, via notecard, that inasmuch as her specialty is the violations of children’s human rights, would she comment on the abuse of the 300 children killed in operation Cast Lead?
She backed away from the question, reiterating that we can agree that it is not right for Islamic children to be abused, which I took as a plea of nolo contendre. Bell, however, offered a heated response rooted in the fiction of human shields and the rules of ‘war’ etc. (Of course, Cast Lead was only war from the Israeli point of view as there was no actual other side, just a civilian population subjected to F-16’s and tanks! War? More like murder)
The mention of the 300 children, a fact that I cannot escape and I do not let others escape, did cast a pall, if only for the moment, over the proceedings and crashed whatever silly hope the organizers might have had that perhaps nobody would rub their collective noses in Israel’s abundantly terrible record. Given this moment, I stalked dramatically out of the auditorium unnoticed by anyone."
“The 36-year-old political wunderkind was squeezing in a meeting with me… before his next appointment, a fundraiser for him hosted by Rep. Henry A. Waxman, Democrat from California—one in a long, long list of veteran Democratic pols eager to help this young man run to represent Arizona’s brand-new 9th Congressional District. That list stretches all the way up to former PRESIDENT CLINTON, CHERNY’S FORMER BOSS…On 23 May 2012, Ahmed Moor said this on the Mondoweiss web site:
Cherny is the 21st-century version of all-American. ALL FOUR OF HIS GRANDPARENTS SURVIVED THE HOLOCAUST… He went to Harvard. He married Stephanie Fleischman, a lawyer with whom he has two kids… and moved to her hometown of Phoenix, Ariz…
Cherny told me: ‘ISRAEL’S SECURITY AND AMERICA’S SECURITY ARE INEXTRICABLY LINKED’…
A decade ago, Slate’s David Plotz called Cherny ‘Clinton’s truest heir,’ which he didn’t mean in an entirely positive way. For all Clinton’s successes—and IF YOU’RE A PROGRESSIVE, those were eight extremely good years—the president was a pure political animal… so WILLING TO COMPROMISE HIS OWN PRINCIPLES FOR THE SAKE OF GETTING A RESULT THAT CRITICS ACCUSED HIM OF LACKING PRINCIPLES ALTOGETHER. Since 2001, Cherny has been, in the Clinton tradition, an AVID POLICY WONK… Cherny no doubt intends to vote in support of the Jewish state if he is elected."
"It was only three-and-a-half years ago that the Israeli army killed 1,400 Palestinians in Gaza - almost a third of whom were children. At the time the Israeli public barely reacted. The country's media covered the massacre in a way that either reflected or enabled a 94% approval rating for what was happening - within sight - in the name of the whole nation.
It wasn't until Judge Richard Goldstone recommended that Israel and Hamas both investigate potential war crimes (14 Israelis were killed; four of them by friendly fire) that some people began to worry. But just a little. And not enough to prevent the killing of 9 unarmed Turkish human rights activists in international waters.
The 'elite' Israeli commandos commandeered the flotilla and returned home. They were saluted and lionized in the press - but only in Israel. Elsewhere, Zionists struggled to explain the Israeli line to skeptical publics. Justifying an invasion in international waters proved impossible. The til-then-unnoticed, unrecognized, or unacknowledged deterioration in Israel's legitimacy suddenly accelerated. And not just in Europe.
Today, the conversation about Zionism in America is dramatically different from what it was only a few years ago. Few credible people are willing to insist that the Palestinians and Israelis engage in 'negotiations.' The fiction that underpinned the call for a 'peace process' - that the two parties are mutual antagonists to a symmetrical dispute - has been unraveled.”
This said:
"We brag about Jewish authors, Jewish politicians, Jewish directors. Every time someone mentions any movie or book or piece of art, we inevitably say something like, “Did you know that he was Jewish?” That’s just how we roll.And thus does the centuries-long disinformation, spin, propaganda and lie predominate. On behalf of an intensely malign ruling clique. To the benefit, supposedly, of that clique. To the detriment, certainly, of the vast majority outside the loop.
We’re a driven group, and not just in regards to the art world. We have, for example, AIPAC, which was essentially constructed just to drive agenda in Washington DC. And it succeeds admirably. And we brag about it. Again, it’s just what we do...
Let’s be honest with ourselves, here, fellow Jews. We do control the media. We’ve got so many dudes up in the executive offices in all the big movie production companies it’s almost obscene. Just about every movie or TV show… is rife with actors, directors, and writers who are Jewish.
Did you know that all eight major film studios are run by Jews?"
I say ‘supposedly’ because, when that majority discovers how profoundly those with the power to shape their opinions, beliefs and world-view have fooled, conned and betrayed them, the vengeful backlash is likely to be considerable.
And they WILL discover these things. When the Jew cannot resist ‘bragging’ about his control of the media; when the stone bl**ding obvious is up close and personal, in your face and, if you don’t want to get done over by the nu-revelatory Hebrew, undeniable; when it isn’t just blokes like us trying to warn the unenlightened as to the real state of affairs; just about everyone is going to find out who’s really in charge and what their agenda is, was and always will be.
At which point, one wonders whether the world might just go bang quite some time before the prophecy-wallahs wanted it to. The prophecy-wallahs wanted it that way!
Just in case you're a tad sceptical, it has all been said before.
“Only 22% of Americans now believe ‘the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews,’ down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows HOW DUMB AMERICA HAS GOTTEN. JEWS TOTALLY RUN HOLLYWOOD.
How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have (had) the power to shut down all film production…
The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (take a guess). The scathing rebuttal to the ad was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emanuel (Jew with Israeli parents)…
The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish…
YES, WE CONTROL HOLLYWOOD…
I called ADL Chairman Abe Foxman... He dismissed my whole proposition, saying that the number of people who think Jews run Hollywood is still too high. The ADL poll, he pointed out, showed that 59% of Americans think Hollywood execs 'do not share the religious and moral values of most Americans,' and 43% think the entertainment industry is waging an organized campaign to 'weaken the influence of religious values in this country.'Don't forget banking, Abe! And politics! And education!
‘That's a very dangerous phrase, 'Jews control Hollywood.' What is true is that there are a lot of Jews in Hollywood,’ he said. Instead of 'control,' Foxman would prefer people say that many executives in the industry 'happen to be Jewish,' as in 'all eight major film studios are run by men who happen to be Jewish.'
But Foxman said he is proud of the accomplishments of American Jews. 'I think Jews are disproportionately represented in the creative industry. They're disproportionate as lawyers and probably medicine here as well,' he said.”
They Jew is not, of course, 'disproportionately represented' down the mines, digging ditches, laying bricks, in the factories, cleaning toilets, on the farms or (Israel excepted) at the battlefront.
And never has been.
From the web site of Neturei Karta, Jews united against Zionism, ‘Why Orthodox Jews are Opposed to the Zionist State.’
“The so-called ‘State of Israel’ is diametrically opposed and completely contradictory to the true essence and foundation of the People of Israel...In the Winter 2012 edition of the American Council for Judaism Issues, its editor, Allan C. Brownfeld, says this:
If one contemplates the two thousand years of our exile, take any hundred years even the hardest, one will not find as much suffering, bloodshed and catastrophes for the People of Israel (as) in the period of the Zionists, and it is known that most of the suffering of this century was caused by the Zionists, as our Rabbis warned us would be the case.
It is openly stated in books written by the founders of Zionism that the means by which they planned to establish a state was BY INSTIGATING ANTI-SEMITISM, AND UNDERMINING THE SECURITY OF THE JEWS IN ALL THE LANDS OF THE WORLD, UNTIL THEY WOULD BE FORCED TO FLEE TO THEIR STATE. And thus they did - THEY INTENTIONALLY INFURIATED THE GERMAN PEOPLE AND FANNED THE FLAMES OF NAZI HATRED, AND THEY HELPED THE NAZIS, WITH TRICKERY AND DECEIT, TO TAKE WHOLE JEWISH COMMUNITIES OFF TO THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS, AND THE ZIONISTS THEMSELVES ADMIT THIS. (See the books Perfidy, Min Hameitzor, etc.).
The Zionists continue to practice this strategy today. THEY INCITE ANTI-SEMITISM AND THEN THEY PRESENT THEMSELVES AS THE ‘SAVIORS.’ Here are two replies given by Leaders of the Zionists during World War II, when they were asked for money to help ransom Jews from the Nazis. Greenbaum said ‘One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland.’ Weitzman said, ‘The most important part of the Jewish people is already in the land (of Israel) and THOSE WHO ARE LEFT, ARE UNIMPORTANT’…
We see that most of world Jewry lives in security and under good physical conditions, and have no desire to go live in the Zionist State. Whereas many people have left the Zionist State to live under better conditions in other lands…
THE ZIONIST STATE COULD NOT CONTINUE TO EXIST WITHOUT ECONOMIC SUPPORT FROM JEWS LIVING OUTSIDE OF THE ZIONIST STATE…
THEY START WARS THAT ENDANGER THE JEWISH PEOPLE, FOR THE SAKE OF THEIR OWN POLITICAL INTERESTS...
THE ZIONISTS HAVE ENOUGH CONTROL OVER THE AMERICAN NEWS MEDIA TO MAKE SURE THAT ONLY THEIR SIDE OF THE STORY IS HEARD. They make it look like all Jewry and their rabbis are Zionists, but this is false propaganda.
THE MOST IMPORTANT RABBIS AND THE MAJORITY OF RELIGIOUS JEWRY ARE OPPOSED TO ZIONISM, BUT THEIR VOICE IS NOT HEARD BECAUSE OF ZIONIST CONTROL OF AMERICAN NEWS MEDIA.
THE ZIONISTS TERRORIZE EVERYONE WHO SPEAKS OUT AGAINST THEM.
That part of the Jewish masses which is fooled by Zionist propaganda puts pressure on their Rabbis not to speak out. Between the terror and the pressure of the masses most of the Rabbis are prevented from speaking out.”
“Attacks on Jewish critics of Zionism and Israeli policies are growing increasingly strident in an effort to silence and isolate the increasing number of men and women who are speaking out…
The effort to intimidate Jewish critics of Zionism and of Israeli policies. a group whose numbers are growing dramatically, is becoming increasingly strident. The use of the term ‘self-hating Jew’ is often applied to such critics. One place to find this label flung at Jewish critics has been the website Masada 2000, whose ‘S.H.I.T. List’ contained almost 8,000 names…
The Jewish tradition of wrestling with, among other things, the truth, is now under attack by THOSE WHO WOULD SILENCE OPEN DISCUSSION. This is leading to the alienation of many, in particular young people.”
No comments:
Post a Comment