The question of who comes to Britain

On 27 January 2011, The Daily Telegraph told us this:

"Practising Muslims will very soon overtake weekly churchgoers in Britain."

Bear this in mind as you consider what Gordon Brown said at Shoreditch Town Hall on 31 March 2010.

“My abiding ambition for Britain is that it is a FAIR SOCIETY – FAIR TO THE HARD WORKING, DECENT MAJORITY WHO PLAY BY THE RULES AND DO THEIR BEST”.

How curious! That’s what the 'decent majority' wants as well.

GB: “And when we talk of fairness it is right to talk of immigration and address people’s worries and concerns”.

Then why, for the last thirty years or so, have the politicians and the PC Crowd howled down anyone who ever raised the issue? I mean, Gordon, do you recognise these words and phrases? 'Racist,' 'Fascist,' 'neo-Nazi,' 'hater,' 'little Englander,' 'dinosaur,' 'BIGOT?' How often have your lot used them to stifle all 'talk of immigration' in recent times?

GB: “The question of who comes to Britain, and what they have to do to earn that privilege, is something that should be the subject of open and responsible debate.”

See above.

GB: “We are proud… of the IMMENSE CONTRIBUTION – ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL – that newcomers to Britain have offered down the years in making Britain the place that it is.”

What about the immense contribution to the crime statistics of all these 'newcomers' to Britain? Why don’t you ever mention them, Gordon? And the 40-year curse upon the indigenous of the immigrant-preference on council house waiting lists? We all know it happens? We all know you’ve been immigrant-partial in this area for more than 40 years now. Now you just tell us, Gordon, how was putting the immigrant to the front and us to the back ever going to make US feel better about THEM!

Oh, your 'newcomers' have 'made Britain the place that it is,' alright, Gordon. There aren't too many who’d disagree with you on that one.

GB: 'I call on all those in the mainstream of our politics to stand together in the coming weeks and present a united front against those who don’t value THE DIVERSE AND OUTWARD LOOKING BRITAIN THAT WE STAND FOR; AND AGAINST THOSE WHO WANT TO END IMMIGRATION SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY JUST DON’T LIKE MIGRANTS.

NO MAINSTREAM PARTY WANTS TO BRING AN END TO IMMIGRATION ALTOGETHER – the debate is over how to control it.'

According to Trevor Philips, in the 1950s, 90 per cent of the British people wanted ALL immigration ended. That 90 per cent were the people who elected your sort back then, Gordon. To serve THEIR needs. To do what THEY wanted done. And that 90 per cent were the people whom the politicians, the supposedly DEMOCRATIC politicians of the time, took precisely no notice of.

Just as you, Cameron, Clegg, and the rest of those who’ve always known so much better and seen so much further than the blinkered 90 per cent, take precisely no notice of what the native, British majority want now.

GB: “NO MAINSTREAM PARTY WANTS TO BRING AN END TO IMMIGRATION”.

We know this, Gordon. Trust me, we do know that, for once, you are not spinning here.

GB: “Immigration understandably and legitimately generates strong feelings right across our communities."

Oh, it does, Gordon, it does. Especially in those communities that have to bear the brunt of the 'immigration.' You know, the working-class communities? It rarely seems to bother the Hampstead and Highgate folk overmuch. The Westminster villagers, the leafy-suburbians and the gated-community types never seem to raise much of a fuss either.

GB: “I KNOW HOW PEOPLE WORRY THAT IMMIGRATION MIGHT BE CHANGING THEIR NEIGHBOURHOODS.”

You do? Then why have you never been on their side? Why has the political class taken absolutely NO notice of their complaints and anxieties since the Windrush arrived? And why has that same political class conducted a decades-long campaign to intimidate and silence anyone who ever dared bring these matters to the attention of the wider public?

Why have you, consistently, and with malice aforethought ALWAYS put the immigrant first and the indigenous working-class Briton last in the land the British made?

GB: “They would worry if IMMIGRATION WAS PUTTING PRESSURE ON SCHOOLS, HOSPITALS AND HOUSING; AND THEY QUESTION WHETHER IMMIGRATION MIGHT UNDERMINE THEIR WAGES OR MIGHT HARM THE JOB PROSPECTS OF THEIR CHILDREN.”

Oh, we would and we do, Gordon. We’ve been worrying about these things since the nineteen-fifties. I just wonder why it's taken your sort fifty years to start talking about it? That’s 'talking about it,' by the way. It’ll probably take another fifty years for a PC politico to actually ADDRESS our concerns. And he’d need to be standing in front of a firing squad even then.

GB: “They question whether MIGRANTS ARE GETTING AHEAD OF THEM IN THE QUEUE FOR HOUSING; OR SOMETIMES THEY ASK US WHETHER THE NATURE OF OUR COMMUNITIES IS CHANGING AT A PACE THAT’S SIMPLY TOO RAPID.”

See above.

GB: “I KNOW PEOPLE THINK IT’S UNFAIR WHEN IT FEELS AS THOUGH SOME CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE FREEDOMS AND OPPORTUNITIES WE OFFER IN BRITAIN WITHOUT MAKING A FAIR CONTRIBUTION OR PLAYING BY THE RULES. SO DO I.”

You do? Really? With an election just a few short weeks away, you 'think it‘s unfair' too? Why are we not surprised?

GB: “We have a duty to listen and engage with THESE BIG ISSUES”.

“Listen and engage“? Listen and ACT would be better, Gordon.

GB: “It is important that this is a national conversation where we say the same things to British citizens that we say to migrants. Where our national speeches are matched by what is said on the doorstep.”

What? You're going to be as nice to us as you are to immigrants all of a sudden? Sorry, Gordon, even a Mandelson or a Blair wouldn’t expect the dumbest Sun-reader to believe quite such a monumental porkie as that one.

GB: “I want to set out also how by investing now in the skills of people here in Britain, we can ensure that local men and women increasingly fill the remaining skills gaps in our economy.”

Ah yes, “British jobs for British workers”, is the operative phrase, isn't it? Heard it all before, Gordon. Then we found out that more than ninety percent of the new jobs created on your watch had been taken up by immigrants. You’ll have to pull the other one, or two, or three, this time, I'm afraid.

GB: “Immigration is not a new phenomenon.”

Immigration on the scale you and the other fanatical, New Labour visionaries have overseen in the last thirteen years is a MASSIVELY 'new' and deeply treacherous 'phenomenon,' Gordon.

GB: “For centuries Britain has been a beacon of enterprise and freedom to which people in other lands have been drawn. 50 thousand French Protestants came to Britain during the 17th and 18th centuries.”

Get the time span, folks. '17th and 18th centuries.' 50,000 over a hundred years and more. Gordon’s lot are known to have welcomed in as many as six hundred thousand in JUST ONE YEAR! And that’s just those we know about!

GB: “From the late 19th century, tens of thousands of European Jews came – again many choosing to settle in Spitalfields and the Whitechapel area. During the 1930s, we gave around 40 thousand Jews from Austria and Germany sanctuary within our shores, in addition to 50 thousand from Italy, Poland and elsewhere in Eastern Europe…

Around ten thousand Polish Jews fought under British command at the battle of Monte Cassino... And after the Second World War, all of them became eligible to settle here under the Polish Resettlement Act of 1947, Britain’s first major immigration law.”
So, the 'first major immigration law' was designed just for the eastern European Jew. Interesting. That’s a lot of Jews in a very short space of time, isn’t it? Around a hundred thousand in a ten-year period. And a lot more came over in the 1970s when the Soviet Union gave around 250,000 Jews exit visas, didn't they? I wonder whether they had anything to do with the mass-immigration putsch we’ve seen in recent times?

Stephen Aris wrote the little known 1970 history, The Jews in Business.

In this work, he tells us why Louis Saipe, the official spokesman of Leeds Jewry, was so delighted to see coloured immigrants pouring into our country, even after there had been 'racial trouble in the city.' Saipe said:

"God has been good to the Jews. HE HAS BROUGHT SOME COLOURED PEOPLE HERE SO THAT PEOPLE FORGOT ABOUT THE JEWS."

In The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Prof. Kevin MacDonald quotes this Charles Silberman passage:

"American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief… that JEWS ARE SAFE ONLY IN A SOCIETY ACCEPTANT OF A WIDE RANGE OF ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS, AS WELL AS A DIVERSITY OF RELIGIOUS AND ETHNIC GROUPS. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads AN OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF AMERICAN JEWS TO ENDORSE 'GAY RIGHTS' and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called 'social' issues."

MacDonald also quotes Earl Raab, former President of Brandeis University. Expressing his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next century whites will become a minority, he writes:

"WE HAVE BEEN NOURISHING THE AMERICAN CLIMATE OF OPPOSITION TO BIGOTRY FOR ABOUT HALF A CENTURY. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible. JUST AS IT TENDS TO MAKE THE ULTIMATE DISPLACEMENT OF EUROPEAN CULTURE ALSO IRREVERSIBLE."

Perhaps then, if it a the Jewish God who 'brought the coloured people here,' it was Saipe, Silberman, Raab and the 'hundred thousand in a ten-year period' who insisted that our bought-and-paid-for politicians open it.

GB: “With the end of the British Empire, many came here from former colonies. West Indians arrived after the war, followed by Indians and Pakistanis after their countries gained independence in 1947 – and after the 1962 Commonwealth Immigrants Act, and again after the independence of Bangladesh in 1971, and from their diasporas in east Africa when they were persecuted there.”

Check out the interracial homicide statistics in England and Waleshere

The statistics therein are hair-raising. THIS is what the Gordons and all the rest of the diversity merchants have been at pains to keep from us ever since they decided to melting-pot our country.

For fifty long years the Brit-loathing PC Crowd have sought to persuade the gullible that such statistics are purely the territory of the 'racist.' When, in fact, those to have attempted to broadcast such truth have only wished to warn their fellow countrymen of the dangers.

GB: “In the twelve months to December 2007, net inward migration as measured by the ONS long term international migration series was 233 thousand. In the twelve months to December 2008 it was 163 thousand… And in the 12 months to June 2009 it was 147 thousand.”

'Net' means the number of foreigners piling in minus the number of Brits escaping to Australia et al. A lot more than 543,00 aliens have taken up residence here in the last three years, that’s for sure.

GB: “NO MAJOR PARTY HAS A DIFFERENT POSITION ON MIGRATION INSIDE THE EU GOING FORWARDS.”

True. Across, the board, politicians are a treacherous bunch who don’t seem to give a toss what the rest of us want.

GB: “The eastern Europeans who came to Britain in the last few years… IN EVERY YEAR THEIR NET CONTRIBUTION WAS POSITIVE - 5 years here they are over 50 per cent less likely than British people to receive benefits or tax credits and over 40 per cent less likely to live in social housing. They pay 5 per cent more than their share of tax, and account for a third less than their share of the costs of public services.”

How absolutely fabulous! The hard working Eastern Europeans and those no-account workshy Brits, eh? Those we vote for do love to do us down, don’t they? And it’s not all rosy in the eastern European garden, not by a long shot. They do take our jobs. They do take our housing, They do put pressure on our schools and hospitals. They do drink and drive and have accidents on our roads out of all proportion to the numbers. Oh yes, they add, significantly, to the crime statistics alright. In short, they adversely affect the everyday life of our native communities.

GB: “I SHARE THAT SENSE OF UNFAIRNESS at the thought that people might be able to come to Britain and take advantage of the freedom and opportunities our society offers without playing by the rules or making a fair contribution to our society.”

NO YOU DON’T!

GB: “So to those migrants who think they can get away without making a contribution; without respecting our way of life; without honouring the values that make Britain what it is – I have only one message – YOU ARE NOT WELCOME.”

YES YOU ARE!

GB: “All newcomers to Britain have a responsibility to obey British law. No exceptions. British citizenship is a privilege that must be earned and a privilege that will be denied to those committing serious crimes.”

Check out the Rogues Gallery here

GB: “Since August 2008 our position has been that THOSE FROM OUTSIDE THE EU WHO COMMIT ANY CRIME RESULTING IN A SENTENCE OF OVER ONE YEAR WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR DEPORTATION. But we have now toughened our stance towards European criminals so that ALL THOSE FROM WITHIN THE EU WHO ARE CONVICTED OF SEX, DRUG OR VIOLENT OFFENCES RESULTING IN A SENTENCE OF OVER ONE YEAR WILL ALSO BE AUTOMATICALLY CONSIDERED FOR DEPORTATION. Last year over 500 EU criminals were deported from the UK.”

Just five hundred were deported? Out of the many ten of thousands who have, actually, committed a crime? Gordon, 1-in-7 of the criminals in our prisons is a foreigner. A fair proportion of the rest are likely to be second and third-generation immigrants.

Just five hundred? And you this is some kind of judicial victory? We all know about the EU’s Human Rights Act, Gordon. We all know you can’t deport the majority of the bad guys even if you wanted to. Because the EU wants the “human rights” of the worst protected at all costs. The human rights of the victims of the worst, well now, that’s another matter entirely.

The Globalists have never paid them much mind, have they? Oh, and note the use of the word 'considered,' folks. When a politician 'considers,' hide your valuables.

GB: “Who has the best plan to control immigration – not who can appeal to our worst instincts of NATIONALISM AND XENOPHOBIA, but who can appeal to our best instincts of a fairer Britain for all the decent hard working families across our country. By controlling immigration for a fairer Britain – by investing in the skills of our own workforce, ('British jobs for British workers') and by ensuring our BUSINESSES secure highly skilled migrants when they need them”.

“We want lots of minimum wage punkah wallahs!”

GB: “This is the practical choice people MUST MAKE for a better more secure more economically prosperous and SOCIALLY COHESIVE Britain”.

This is the practical choice the PC Crowd HAVE MADE, ARE MAKING AND WILL CONTINUE TO MAKE until they are stopped. The Tower of Babel, with all those competing voices clamouring to be heard, was NEVER a 'socially cohesive' entity. And the Gordons all know it.

Here's what Andrew Neather, an advisor to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett amongst others, said about New Labour's immigration policy:

“THE DELIBERATE POLICY OF MINISTERS FROM LATE 2000 UNTIL AT LEAST FEBRUARY LAST YEAR… WAS TO OPEN UP THE UK TO MASS MIGRATION…

MASS IMMIGRATION WAS THE WAY THAT THE GOVERNMENT WAS GOING TO MAKE THE UK TRULY MULTICULTURAL... THE POLICY WAS INTENDED… TO RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY… The results were dramatic. In 1995, 55,000 FOREIGNERS WERE GRANTED THE RIGHT TO SETTLE IN THE UK. BY 2005 THAT HAD RISEN TO 179,000... In addition, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF MIGRANTS HAVE COME FROM THE NEW EU MEMBER STATES SINCE 2004, MOST REQUIRING NEITHER VISAS NOR PERMISSION TO WORK OR SETTLE…

THE GOVERNMENT HAD CREATED ITS LONGED-FOR IMMIGRATION BOOM”. (London Evening Standard - 23 October 2009)

No one but the politicians, the press, the PC Crowd and the immigrants themselves ever wanted the above. Trouble is, the British people keep voting for those who aren't ever going to give them what they want.

And the moral of the story is:

"Practising Muslims will very soon overtake weekly churchgoers in Britain."

And it's all our fault!

Well, yours anyway.