Friday, 9 June 2006

Pornography, revolution and the spend-it boy

On 29 December 2009, The Daily Mail reported thus:
“The Labour politician with the highest expenses claim of any London MP has denied that he was cheating taxpayers by claiming a second-home allowance while maintaining that his main home is a single-bedroom schoolhouse and seaside caravan 70 miles from his constituency. Defiant left-winder, Harry Cohen, said::

'When MPs were given this allowance they were told ‘go and spend it, boys, and that is what I have done. It is my right’…

Mr Cohen has claimed every single penny of the maximum £104,701 in Commons expenses in the past five years for his £375,000 property in his Leyton and Wanstead constituency in East London, on the basis that it is his 'second home'.

Astonishingly, he says he has claimed the full second-home allowance since 1990. It means he has pocketed a staggering £310,714 in total - believed to be the largest amount ever claimed by any MP. Yet he declares on his Labour website that he and wife Ellen 'live' in Leyton and 'spend weekends at their static caravan' on Mersea Island, an unspoilt stretch of the East Anglian coast. If his real main residence is the Leyton house, it means his Commons allowance has funded a holiday home completely unconnected with either his parliamentary or constituency duties.

The couple also own a quaint one-bedroom former schoolhouse in Colchester, 20 minutes away, providing them with an ideal 'twin holiday centre' for weekends and summer. Mersea Island is full of second homes and Mrs Cohen said there were big advantages to having another home away from her husband's constituency.

'We can get drunk in Colchester and and no one knows who we are,' she joked.

Commons rules for the second-home allowance are very clear: you cannot claim the money for your main home 'where you spend more nights than any other'. By his own admission, Mr Cohen spends most nights in London. He would therefore be unable to claim expenses for his Colchester home because it has no connection with his political duties, either in his constituency or at Westminster…

When The Mail on Sunday pointed out that Commons rules say an MP's main home is where they spend most nights of the week, and that he admits to spending most nights of the week at his London home, Mr Cohen replied:

'Traditionally, lots of MPs never lived where their constituencies are. They would swan in to their constituency and swan out the same day.'

Mr Cohen, 59, bought the Leyton house in 2005 for £375,000, upgrading from a previous home in the constituency, also bought on expenses…

When Mr Cohen entered Parliament in 1983, he had only one property, in Leyton. In 1990 he bought a flat in Wapping and started claiming the second-home allowance, then £9,914 a year, on the basis he needed it to perform his Commons duties. In 1998, he sold the flat and bought the home in Colchester. To carry on receiving his ACA, he had to declare Colchester as his main home. His website leaves little room for doubt about which is Mr Cohen's real 'main home'… It goes on to say that he likes to spend Friday evenings in The Essex, a popular pub in Leyton.

Mr Cohen caused a minor stir last year when he disclosed his passion for writing erotic poems, some of which border on pornographic.”
On 17 September 2008, the essay, In Praise of Perversion, by best selling author Howard Jacobson, was published in The Independent.

This is what Jacobson said:
“We are all sick in our way. In the erotic life of men and women there is no such thing as health... We should acquaint ourselves with pornography, in whatever form it takes... I feel about prostitution as I do about pornography that a man ought to avail himself of whatever is on offer...

Whenever I encounter a man who says he has never visited a prostitute, either because the thought appals him or, as is more commonly asserted, because he doesn't need to pay for sex, thank you very much, I believe that he is lying, or, worse, that he is a fool...

You cannot... attain the poisoned bliss vouchsafed to the dissolute and the deranged if you are cautious and well-adjusted... The best eroticism can do against the law, in so far as it has a choice in the matter, is to keep pushing the boundaries… We grow a little freer when we read de Sade's 'One Thousand Days of Sodom'...

Whatever our education and our civic institutions try to lull us into believing about the nature of desire, we must find the space to think, and where possible to act, rebelliously, refusing all attempts to confine us to the hell of the normative... It is too cruel that… we are should ever have been made to think there is a right way and a wrong way of conducting ourselves sexually…

The straight and narrow has never yet made anyone anything but miserable.”
Thus spake a self-justifying pervert.

Richard Desmond, the owner of Express Newspapers, is Jewish too. He made his fortune as a pornographer. The last time I looked, he still owned the porno magazines: 40-Plus, 50 and Over, All Girl Action, Amateur Video, Asian Babes, Best of Asian Babes, Best of Big and Black, Best of Big Ones, Big and Black, Big Ones, Best of Electric Blue, Bumper Video Pack, Contact Girls, For Women, For Men, Genuine Wives, Horny Housewives, Mothers-in-Law, New Talent, Only 18, Pantie Parade, X-Treme, Young and Old. Nude Readers' Wives, Readers' Wives, Real Wives, Red Hot Pack and Stuffed amongst others.

He also owns The Fantasy Channel and the satellite station Television X, which features such programmes as Sorority Sex Kittens, Spunk S***ing Sluts and Jane's Big Jug Jamboree.

Desmond donated £100,000 to New Labour by way of a 'thank you' for not opposing his bid for Express Newspapers. Tony Blair invited him to Downing Street for a chat on the day the sale went through.

Murdoch and Maxwell, of Page 3 fame, are and were Jewish also; just as the 'pornographer-in-chief' of Channel 4 (he was also ITV's boss for a while), Michael Grade, is Jewish; just as Channel 5's first hard-core porn boss, David Elstein, is Jewish as well.

Just as the Jew has always been way over-represented in pornography, so it is with the Desmonds; Murdochs; Maxwells; Grades; Elsteins; Jacobsons and Harry Cohens.

In The Mail's article, Cohen also says:
“I moved because I wanted to be near the woods so I can walk our Jack Russell dog, Rosa - named after German socialist Rosa Luxemburg.”
Winston Churchill wrote Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People, whilst he was Secretary for War. In the essay, which first appeared in the 8 February 1920 edition of The Sunday Herald, he said:
“From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.

It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. it has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire...

The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. the same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people.”
Interesting what THEY do NOT teach us in school, isn't it?

Just to be sure you understand what Churchill was daring to say here, Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Illuminati, who, with Rothschild money, did much to provoke the French Revolution, was Jewish. Karl Marx, who published The Communist Manifesto in 1848, the year of Europe-wide revolutions, was Jewish. Lev Trotsky (born Leon Bronstein), first head of the Red Army and second only to Lenin in power and influence, was Jewish. (Trotsky also invented the word 'racist', in its pejorative sense); Bela Kun, leader of the Soviet regime that came to power in 1919 Hungary, was Jewish. (The execution in that year of 590 of his opponents led to the slaughterous civil war that followed) Rosa Luxemburg, who attempted to stage a revolutionary coup in 1919 Germany, was also Jewish. As was the US-based revolutionary, Emma Goldman.

I'm guessing that Churchill and Cohen would have disagreed about the excellence of one Rosa Luxemburg. Let’s have a little look at what the Spartacus history website has to say about her.

“Rosa Luxemburg, the youngest of five children of a lower middle-class Jewish family was born in Zamosc, in the Polish area of Russia... While in Switzerland she met other socialist revolutionaries from Russia living in exile including, Alexandra Kollontai, George Plekhanov, Leo Jogiches and Pavel Axelrod. In 1893 Luxeburg joined with Leo Jogiches to form the Social Democratic Party of Poland. As it was an illegal organization, she went to Paris to edit the party's newspaper…
A committed revolutionary, Luxemburg campaigned with Karl Kautsky against the revisionist Eduard Bernstein… During the 1905 revolution, Luxemburg and Jogiches returned to Warsaw where they were soon arrested. Luxemburg's experiences during the failed revolution changed her views on international politics. 
Until then, Luxemburg believed that a socialist revolution was most likely to take place in an advanced industrialized country such as Germany or France. She now argued it could happen in an underdeveloped country like Russia… She continued to advocate the need for a violent overthrow of capitalism… Vladimir Lenin favoured the Polish section led by Karl Radek over those of Luxemburg.

In December 1914, she joined with Karl Liebnecht, Leo Jogiches, Paul Levi, Ernest Meyer, Franz Mehring and Clara Zetkin to establish an underground political organization called Spartakusbund… 
Luxemburg and Karl Liebnecht were arrested and imprisoned… Luxemburg was not released until October, 1918, when Max von Baden granted an amnesty to all political prisoners. Two months later Luxemburg joined with Karl Liebnecht, Leo Jogiches, Paul Levi, Ernest Meyer, Franz Mehring and Clara Zetkin to establish the German Communist Party.  
In January 1919, Luxemburg helped organise the Spartakist Rising in Berlin. Friedrich Ebert, the leader of the Social Democrat Party and Germany's new chancellor, called in the German Army and the Freikorps to bring an end to the rebellion... Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebnecht were executed without trial on 15th January 1919.” 
Of those characters mentioned in the preceding paragraphs, Luxemburg, Karl Liebnecht, George Plekhanov, Leo Jogiches, Pavel Axelrod, Karl Kautsky, Eduard Bernstein, Karl Radek, Paul Levi and Ernest Meyer were all Jewish. Lenin’s grandfather was also Jewish.

What, I wonder, does Spartacus have to say about a couple of gentlemen called Eisner and Levine? Let’s see:
“Fearing a counter-revolution, supporters of Eisner established soldiers' and workers' councils and took over the government from the national assembly. Eugen Levine, a member of the German Communist Party, became the new leader of the Bavarian republic.

Levine, like the Bolsheviks had done in Russia, established Red Guard units to defend the revolution… The Red Guards began arresting people they considered to be hostile to the new regime. on 29th April 1919, eight men were executed after being found guilty of being right-wing spies.

Friedrich Ebert, the president of Germany, now ordered the German Army and the Freikorps into Bavaria… Eugen Levine was arrested and, after being found guilty of being involved in the execution of the eight spies, was shot by a firing squad.”
For 'right-wing spies' you should read, ordinary German blokes who were concerned enough to pay a bit too much attention to what Jewish communists like Eisner and Levine were doing.

In a similar vein, the August 1919, US War Department report: The Power And Aims Of International Jewry, gives us the following massive clue as to why the German people welcomed the Nazis with open arms in the 1930s.
“As for the Communist leaders in Bavaria, for instance Toller, Levine, Muhsam, Landauer, Lipp, and, in fact, all whom I met in the April Soviet days in Munich, were Jews… Although less than one per cent of the German population consists of Jews, fully 75% of its present leaders, conservative and radical, are Semitic...

As for the majority socialist, it must be remembered that the Socialist party was founded by Karl Marx, a Jew and co-ordinated by Ferdinand Lasalle and the elder Liebknecht, also jews, while it was economically developed by Singer, another jew… The most active anti-socialist leaders in Germany, Theodor Wolff, George Bernhard and a dozen others of similar standing, are likewise Jews. Hugo Haase, leader of the Independent Socialist Party, is a jew, as are practically all of its more important leaders…

Nearly all of the newspaper editors and publicists whom I have encountered, from Maximilian Harden up and down the line, are Jews and, so far as I can make out, nearly all the berlin bankers are of the same race.”
The journalist, Ben Hecht, the chap that wrote the above, went on to become a playwright and Hollywood script writer. Jewish himself, in the 1940s, he formed a committee to raise money for the Irgun, the Israeli terrorist organisation, and, in his autobiography, he paid tribute to the notorious Jewish gangster Mickey Cohen who raised large sums of money for the Irgun through his criminal activities. So, one must presume his August 1919 commentary was no anti-Jewish tract.

Anyway, as Spartacus points out, a great many Jews were involved in the various revolutionary uprisings that took place in Germany just after WWI ended.

Rosa Luxemburg was a Polish Jewess who tried, through revolutionary means, to overthrow the established order in Germany when that country was at a very low ebb. And the former MP, Harry Cohen, think's she's fab. It makes you wonder why such important historical information, which would explain why so many throughout continental Europe feared and distrusted the Jews, has never appeared in a British schoolbook, doesn't it?

In 1994, during a Commons debate on the desire of certain MPs to introduce even more race relations legislation into law, Harry Cohen said this:
"In 1985, I introduced the Racial Harassment Bill… It was the first Bill presented to Parliament to make racial attack a criminal offence...

The British National Party… is a threat to democracy and I would not be opposed to banning it… If the Government say that there would be civil liberties problems in banning the BNP, they need to make its activities illegal…

It is in multicultural, multiracial societies where people live together that one has harmony; those societies equal life."
Sir Ivan Lawrence, Conservative MP for Burton, who is also Jewish, had this to say during the debate:
“Racism, in all its forms, is an evil and destructive force in our multiracial society…

Most of us believe that we may be able to deter racist attacks by the threat of greater punishment… We believe that… that an assault motivated by racism is more socially divisive and corrosive of the very fabric of our tolerant society and, for that reason, is itself more serious.

The majority of members of the Home Affairs Committee believe that the matter is so serious, and will become increasingly more so, that the present state of the law is simply not enough. We therefore suggest that new clause 127 should create five new offences of racially motivated assault… We intend to treat the matter more seriously through the power to impose a more substantial sentence, which is why the Commission for Racial Equality and other organisations are in favour of the measure…

Is there a need for a new offence of racial harassment to deal with the drip, drip, drip effect of constant harassment? the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the Commission for Racial Equality, the Anti-Racist Alliance and a number of others all say yes.

There were strong criticisms of the working of the present legislation, particularly from the Board of Deputies of British Jews.”
During the same debate, David Sumberg, Labour MP for Bury South, said this:

“I suppose that I have a unique qualification to speak… not simply because I am Jewish, but because I represent in my constituency many members of the Jewish community…
Something must be done to combat and reduce the rising tide of racism in our society, which principally affects the black and Asian communities, but which affects the Jewish community as well…

The Government have tabled new clause 125, which I warmly welcome. It will make the publication of racist literature an arrestable offence…We must tackle the evil in society… It is unacceptable for there to be a rise in membership of the hard right in Britain, which has always been a tolerant, just and humane society, a society that has welcomed immigrants to its shores for many years.”
Yes, Mr Sumberg, and look what so many of those immigrants have done to that 'tolerant, just and humane society,' just a little way down the line.

Gerald Kaufman, who introduced the 1994 bill, said this:
“I moved a new clause to the public order bill in standing committee G on April 10 1986, which would have created an offence of racial harassment… I moved the new clause, as the official representative of Her Majesty’s Opposition in the Standing Committee.

The House of Commons should send a message to the members of ethnic minority communities, of whom I regard myself as one, that parliament considers crimes with a racial element as even more intolerable than other crimes… The question is whether the law should have greater rigour… It is about whether the law should say:

If you attack someone, that is odious, but if you attack someone because they are black or an Asian or Chinese or a Jew, that is even more odious than your attack on them per se…

The merit of our new clause is that if… there is additional evidence of a racial element, the judge could expand the sentence… Parliament needs to send a signal to members of the ethnic minorities in this country that parliament has a special concern for them.”
In other words, as Orwell said:
“People are equal, but some people are more equal than others.”
Particularly if they are 'Asian, Chinese or a Jew,' or, for that matter, anyone at all from the 'ethnic minorities.'

Kaufman is also Jewish.

Barbara Roche said this during the same debate:
“Our new clause says… that the racial element carries with it an additional punishment,to say to people: ‘You have committed a crime, and the law of the land as it existed before this Act said that that crime was punishable by such-and-such a sentence, but because you committed that crime, which had a racial concomitant, you shall be punished even more’.”
It must seem extraordinary to the unenlightened that those to whom the kind, tolerant and fair-minded British gave sanctuary such a short time before, should prove so ungrateful that they could determine to criminalise their hosts within the same generation that sanctuary was given.

However, an intimate knowledge of Jewish behaviour throughout the millenia could have alerted the British to the dangers of the massive movement westward of this most universally hated of the earth’s peoples before and during the war years. There were, actually, many who spoke out against the unrestricted Jewish emigration from Europe that World Jewry were calling for prior to World War Two. At the very highest levels of government anti-semitic sentiment was the rule, not the exception. For example, in July 1938, an international conference was convened by Franklin D. Roosevelt in, Evian, France. The annexation of Austria, which created another 200,000 would-be refugees in an instant, was the immediate trigger for the conference.

Of the thirty-one nations attending the conference, the only country willing to help the Jews was the Dominican Republic, who offered to accept up to 100,000 of them. All the other countries that attended the conference, including the British, refused to help.

However, once the war had begun, the voices of the Cassandras were silenced, at one end of the argument, by the entirely understandable sympathy that the good-hearted British felt for those who had been disenfranchised by politics and war, and, at the other end, by the unelected Churchill appointee, Victor Rothschild, a mega-rich Jew himself, who introduced the notorious 'Regulation 18b' in 1940.

This law allowed for the imprisonment, without trial, of anyone Churchill and Rothschild suspected might cause the warmongers embarrassment. These were, invariably, the same people who were speaking out against unchecked Jewish immigration.

The aforementioned Jewess, Barbara Roche, was the Immigration Minister who first put forward the idea that 'managed migration' was a good idea.

The Telegraph said this on 12 September 2000:
“Roche said skills shortages, especially in information technology, and demographic changes made a rethink of immigration essential. There have been suggestions that the Government planned to open the door to 100,000 new immigrants a year. Furthermore, it has intended to introduce an American ‘green card’ settlement system, which allows a recipient to stay for life and even bring in family without qualifying for citizenship or voting rights.”
The Independent of 24 June 2003 stated:
“Tony Blair should promote the benefits of legal immigration to Britain… Barbara Roche, the former equalities minister, has urged.

Ms Roche… said the Government could reconnect with Labour voters upset by the war on Iraq by championing a radical agenda on behalf of ethnic minorities, gays and lesbians, the disabled, older people and women. the party could create ‘clear water’ between it and the opposition by speaking up for legal migrants and introducing legislation to end discrimination.

Ms Roche… also said ministers should not be frightened of tackling discrimination and should create a single equalities body to protect and promote the rights of ethnic groups, homosexuals, religious groups, the disabled and older people.

Ms Roche said she was proud to be the first ImmigrationMminister to talk of the merits of inward migration…

As Equalities Minister, she steered through Whitehall new regulations outlawing homophobic and religious discrimination by employers and drew up plans for civil partnerships for homosexuals…. She also produced a little noticed but far-reaching report on how to get people from ethnic minorities into the jobs and careers they deserved…

As Immigration Minister she urged the relaxation of controls on foreign workers in favour of ‘managed migration’ to meet skills shortages…

The child of a Polish-Russian Ashkenazi father and a Sephardic Spanish-Portuguese mother, Ms Roche has reason for her feelings on immigration.

'My being Jewish informs me totally, informs my politics. I understand the otherness of ethnic groups’.”
I don’t know about that Babs, you don’t seem to understand the 'otherness' of the British 'ethnic group' at all. What, you think we were kidding when we said: 'no more immigrants, please' in 1948, when the Windrush arrived? You think we were kidding in 1958 when the Notting Hill riots occurred? You think we were kidding in 1964 when Peter Griffiths beat pro-immigration MP, Patrick Gordon-Walker, the man Wilson wanted as his Foreign Secretary, in Smethwick?

And Babs, do you think we were kidding in 1976, when, after listeners cast their votes, Enoch Powell was named BBC Radio’s Man of the Year? And Babs, do you think we were kidding in July 2003, when The BBC conducted the most wide ranging opinion poll ever, (discounting general elections) to determine what the British people thought about immigration?

You The Judge asked the viewers to phone a given number giving their opinion on whether four separate asylum seekers should be allowed to stay in Britain. Every one of the four tales told was a harrowing one. Nevertheless the results were conclusive. Overall, 64 per cent of those who voted wanted immigration into this country brought to a halt, no matter what the circumstances of the applicant.

This despite the fact that the four cases put to them were as emotionally loaded as could be, despite fifty years of ubiquitous 'anti-fascist, they enrich our society' media and parliamentary propaganda, despite the politically correct and the professional bleeding hearts forever lecturing us on how we must feel, act and think and despite the fact that more than 10 per cent of those who voted in You The Judge could well have been first or second-generation immigrants themselves.

And thus somewhat more inclined to have voted as you would have done.

The wishes of the 90,000 people living in Britain, not all of whom would have been British, were canvassed and logged in July 2003, but the politicians, as usual, took no notice.

Scornfully dismissive of the wishes of the majority, in November of the same year David Blunkett, the Home Secretary, said that he thought 200,000 LEGAL IMMIGRANTS should be encouraged to enter Britain annually. He also said that he saw no reason why Britain could not tolerate this level of immigration INDEFINITELY, adding:
“There is no obvious upper limit to immigration… It is a crowded island, we’ve always been a crowded, vigorous island… A net increase of 200,000 people per year is permanently sustainable.”
In his own parliamentary words, the pro-porn, pro-Bolshevik revolutionary MP, Harry Cohen, once introduced 'the first Bill presented to Parliament to make racial attack a criminal offence.'

That he and so many of his fellow Jews have been involved in pornography, violent revolution and the criminalisation of the British people via the race laws, should prove instructive to those who give a damn.

Check out a little more of Harry Cohen's treacherously subversive, anti-British parliamentary activity here.

No comments:

Post a Comment